View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Oryza sativa ✕
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
Organ / stagetillering stage e4 Outcomedecrease in the yield of the rice e4 Qualifierdecrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.
Organ / stageear primordial stage e4 Outcomedecrease in the yield of the rice e4 Qualifierdecrease in its harvest index(HI) e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-rice yield tended to decrease with time compared with early-rice yield .
Comparatorearly-rice yield e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “late-rice yield tended to decrease , compared with early-rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–440 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
When soil water potential continued to decrease , no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.
TreatmentSWP continued to be decreased e6 Directionno longer obvious decrease e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Quality of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52 e2 “the yield of two cultivars was decrease d significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558 e6 “but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield .
Treatmentlight water stress e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Surabyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Comparator11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570 t0 “on Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hwayeongbyeo yield decrease at low nitrogen was not significant.
Comparator11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in yield was not significant in Surabyeo and Hwayeongbyeo compared with the 11 kg/10a N-fertilizer treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–570 t0 “on Rice Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early-rice yield under the different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time.
Outcomeearly-rice yield e0 Directiondid not significantly increase or decrease e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “early-rice yield under different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–368 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jupiter rice, head rice yield fell 8.5 pp per 1.0 pp decrease in surface lipid content.
Qualifier1.0 pp decrease in SLC e0 Verbatim
e0 “those of Jupiter, 8.5 pp decrease in HRY per 1.0 pp decrease in SLC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–874 e1 “rice cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–508 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TCB was the main reason for the decrease of rice grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The survival percentage of rice seedlings was significantly reduced by TCB, which was the main reason for the decrease of the grain yield , while NAP had little effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–461 t0 “on grain yield and quality of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–85 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.