View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.
ear primordial stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its harvest index(HI) e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In wide rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to reduced boll retention or fruiting sites.
spurred anoda interference e0 spurred anoda e0 weed reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease as a result of spurred anoda interference in WR was due to reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites (predicated on a decrease in branch weight). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1238 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In ultra narrow rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to plant mortality.
spurred anoda e0 weed plant mortality e0 Verbatim
e0 “However, in UNR, the yield decrease was due to plant mortality; the plant density of both cotton cultivars decrease d by one plant for each additional spurred anoda, but the yield per plant for surviving plants remained constant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1467 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower seed yield in later fruit was mainly due to lower mean seed weight.
later fruits e0 decrease in mean seed weight e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield in later fruits was due mainly to a decrease in mean seed weight rather than a decrease in the number of seeds per fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–964 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low resistance to fungal leaf pathogens was identified as the main cause of yield decrease across cultivars.
fungal pathogens e0 pathogen low level of resistance e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease for all cultivars was mainly affected by low level of resistance on fungal pathogens responsible for leaf diseases. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–905 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The fall in tomato yield was due in part to a decrease in fruit size.
Solairo and Espero e0 a decrease in fruit size e7 Verbatim
e0 “two standard round fruited cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill) Solairo and Espero, grown in rockwool ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–305 e7 “The fall in yield was due, in part, to a decrease in fruit size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1395 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower well-water temperature was asserted to directly influence the pepper yield decrease .
Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum e3 Verbatim
e0 “yield of pepper hybrids Cecil F1 and Bianca F1 in the early glasshouse production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–191 e3 “Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum and therefore had direct influence on the yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–785 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Well-water irrigation decreased pepper crop yield relative to lagoon water. Intervention effect Irrigation water efficiency differed between the two water sources (P<0,05). Association Average fruit weight differed significantly between the two pepper hybrids (P<0,05). Association The two pepper hybrids reacted differently to lagoon and well water (significant interaction). Association Factor year did not significantly affect pepper crop yield in the controlled glasshouse. Intervention effect Well water had higher values than lagoon water for EC, sodium, potassium, calcium, chlorine, magnesium, bicarbonate, sulphate, iron and boron. Observation Well-water irrigation caused accumulation of slime and blocking of sprinklers. Observation Well-water irrigation disturbed soil structure and caused fruit deformation. Mechanism author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that characteristics increasing plant-weight variability will decrease harvest index and crop yield .
PHI, and crop yield e0 variability in PWT within a population e0 Verbatim
e0 “Agronomic or physiological characteristics that lead to variability in PWT within a population will decrease PHI, and crop yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1769 t0 “Four Grain Legumes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–97 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease was compensated to a level similar to Enrei, attributed to enhanced nodule growth during recovery.
Yield Decrease Is Compensated e6 Enhanced Nodule Growth During The Recovery Stage e6 Verbatim
t0 “Supernodulating Soybean Cultivar Sakukei 4 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–112 e6 “But Yield Decrease Is Compensated To A Level Similar To That of Enrei Because of Its Enhanced Nodule Growth During The Recovery Stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1677 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativae4
Gossypium hirsutum
Triticum aestivum
Solanum lycopersicum
Glycine max