View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1046 t0 “Sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 t1 “decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–898 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
Cultivars with the largest yield e0 largest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease .
Higher seasonal totals e0 Verbatim
e0 “Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease .
earlier initiation of MPB application e0 Verbatim
e0 “Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late-rice yield tended to decrease with time compared with early-rice yield .
early-rice yield e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 e0 “late-rice yield tended to decrease , compared with early-rice yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–440 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Branch pod compensation limited per plant seed yield decrease to 52%.
per-plant seed yield decrease e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “partial compensation by pods on the branches reduced mean per-plant seed yield decrease to 52% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1093 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Varsha had a 13% yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241 t0 “okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield .
tillering stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its biological yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.
ear primordial stage e4 decrease in the yield of the rice e4 decrease in its harvest index(HI) e4 Verbatim
e4 “The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In wide rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to reduced boll retention or fruiting sites.
spurred anoda interference e0 spurred anoda e0 weed reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease as a result of spurred anoda interference in WR was due to reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites (predicated on a decrease in branch weight). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1238 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Recommendation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A concomitant decrease in autumn plant height may not affect autumn yield .
Verbatim
e0 “A concomitant decrease in autumn plant height may not affect autumn yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1640 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Special attention should be paid to the decrease of additive variance for yield in QPM breeding.
decrease of additive variance for yield trait e4 Verbatim
t0 “maize inbred lines with quality protein in Sichuan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–87 e4 “Special attention should be paid to the decrease of additive variance for yield trait,because this trend was the most possibly accompanied by genetic base narrow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–659 Other claims from this paper (1) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Including transpiration efficiency in the index would prevent its decrease when selecting for kernel yield .
an index including TE e0 Verbatim
e0 “Use of an index including TE would prevent selection for decreasing TE when selecting for KY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1627 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
vegetables, and ornamentals e1 calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 polynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Selecting for minimal yield decrease under stress failed to identify the best genotypes in this context.
identify the best genotypes e0 favorable conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “a selection based on minimum yield decrease under stress with respect to favorable conditions failed to identify the best genotypes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1667 e1 “barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–159 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The optical sensor algorithm can decrease environmental contamination due to excess nitrogen fertilization.
environmental contamination e0 Verbatim
t0 “Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 e0 “Using our optical sensor‐based algorithm that employs yield prediction and N responsiveness by location (0.4 m2 resolution) can increase yield s and decrease environmental contamination due to excessive N fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–2008 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Medicago sativa
Zea mays
Arachis hypogaea.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare