View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon changed husked yield from an 8% increase to an 18% decrease across rates, timings and seasons.
Value8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Effects of ethephon on husked yield varied from an 8% increase in yield to an 18% decrease , depending on rate, timing, and season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–711 e1 “sweet corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–189 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
Treatmentbacterial inoculation e0 Interactorbacterial e0 symbiont Value50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield .
Interactorsicklepod e0 weed Outcomeaddition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac e0 Qualifierpotential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced vegetative growth did not necessarily produce a comparable seed yield reduction.
Organ / stagevegetative growth e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in vegetative growth did not necessarily result in a comparable decrease in seed yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1941 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced adjusted solute potential was not consistently associated with grain yield response.
Treatmentdecrease in adjusted solute potential e0 Outcomegrain yield response e0 Qualifiernot consistently associated e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in adjusted solute potential was not consistently associated with a grain yield response. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1338 t0 “Oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
An increase in B/P was almost offset by a decrease in DFF, DFB or both.
MaterialGiza 83 X Giza 75 t0 Verbatim
e0 “An increase in B/p.An increase B/p was almost offset by a decrease of either DFF, DFB or both ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1203 t0 “EGYPTIAN COTTON CROSS GIZA 83 X GIZA 75 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Association Lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with harvested boll number, boll weight, lint index, Pressley index and vegetative branch number. Association In F2, lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with lint percentage. Association In F3, lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with days to first open boll. Association In F2, the leading path contributors to lint yield variation were B/P, LI X SI, LI and SI, in that order. Association In F3, leading contributors to lint yield variation were B/P, paths through BW and PI, and the direct effect of BW. Association DFF and DFB were the main contributors to harvested boll number. Recommendation Selection for lint yield should target prolificacy of these traits in breeding material. Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall fruit yield stabilized at high cane density and tended to decline above an optimum density.
Treatmenthigh cane density e0 Outcomeoverall fruit yield e0 Qualifierafter an optimum number of canes per meter row was reached e0 Verbatim
e0 “The increase in overall fruit yield stabilised at high cane density and there was a tendency for it to decrease after an optimum number of canes per meter row was reached. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2141–2312 t0 “red Raspberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–127 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced legume control did not consistently lower corn or cotton yield except under glyphosate alone.
Treatmentreduced legume control e0 Outcomecorn or cotton yield e0 Directiondid not consistently decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Except for poor control of hairy vetch and crimson clover by glyphosate alone, reduced legume control did not consistently decrease corn or cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–666 t0 “Corn (Zea mays ) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–88 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight and number per plant decrease d as waterlogging depth and duration increased, while mean fruit weight increased.
OutcomeWeight and number of fruit per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “Weight and number of fruit per plant displayed gradual decrease as the depth and hours of water-logging became increased. Average weight of a fruit became increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2275–2439 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding side shoots at low density gave about 5% less yield than high density, from 33% fewer plants.
TreatmentThe addition of side shoots at low density e7 Directiondecrease inferred e6 Qualifier33% fewer plants e6 Comparatorhigh density treatment e6 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of glasshouse-grown tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–79 e7 “The addition of side shoots at low density produced fruit of more uniform size throughout the year and the yield of grade D fruit was almost as high as from plants grown at high density throughout ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1687 e6 “These benefits were accompanied by a 5% loss of yield but from 33% fewer plants, relative to the high density treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1808 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.