View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvesting rate increased by 40.8 kg/h with an approximate 2 m decrease in tree height.
Outcomeharvesting rate per picker e0 Qualifier2 m decrease in tree height e0 Verbatim
e0 “harvesting rate per picker increased 40.8 kg/h (equivalent to one field box of Florida oranges per hour) for an approximate increase of either 20 t/ha in yield or 50 g in fruit weight, or a 2 m decrease in tree height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–618 t0 “Orange Grove ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cercospora capsici infection led to yield losses in chilli.
Directiondecrease inferred e2 Verbatim
e2 “leading to losses in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–171 t0 “Infection of Chilli by Cercospora capsici ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–41 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Incorporating only persian clover shoots decrease d grain yield by 24% versus whole biomass.
Treatmentsole shoot incorporation e0 Qualifierpersian clover e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The corresponding decrease in grain yield s was 24% and 14% under sole shoot incorporation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1036 e1 “root incorporation of persian clover and hairy vetch led to a 5% decrease and 3% increase in grain yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–930 t0 “Cereal Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–157 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Incorporating only hairy vetch shoots decrease d grain yield by 14% versus whole biomass.
Treatmentsole shoot incorporation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The corresponding decrease in grain yield s was 24% and 14% under sole shoot incorporation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1036 e1 “root incorporation of persian clover and hairy vetch led to a 5% decrease and 3% increase in grain yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–930 t0 “Cereal Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–157 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Coefficient of variability declined as plot size increased.
Outcomecoefficient of variability (CV%) e0 Comparatorplot size (x) e0 Verbatim
e0 “As plot size (x) increased the variance per basic unit (Vx) and coefficient of variability (CV%) tended to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–573 t0 “SUNFLOWER YIELD TRIALS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sprouted wheat samples had lower thousand kernel weight and flour yield in four varieties
Treatmentsprouted samples e4 Outcomethousand kernel weight and Ilour yield e4 Qualifierof four varieties e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Eight commercial wheat varieties were harvested in two sets, i.e. pre-rain and post-rain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88 e4 “There was a decrease in thousand kernel weight and Ilour yield in sprouted samples of four varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–439 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher initial M. incognita inoculum was associated with lower Davana oil yield .
Treatmentinitial inoculum levels of the nematode e0 Verbatim
e0 “an Increase in initial inoculum levels of the nematode cause a corresponding decrease in shoot height, root length, fresh/dry root and shoot weight, and oil yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–651 e1 “initial populations of M. incognita ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–393 t0 “Davana,Artemisia pallens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
AMV caused a smaller decline in Serena medic seed yield .
Outcomemedic seed yields e0 Directionsmaller decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In plots containing Serena there was a smaller decrease in medic seed yield s due to AMV infection, so the impact on germination was less. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1803 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation decrease d Trifolium yield when grown in mixture with Lolium .
TreatmentRhizobium inoculatione6 Qualifierwhen in mixture with Lolium e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Trifolium repens was sampled from 10 areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 e6 “Rhizobium inoculation did not consistently increase Trifolium yield ; it actually caused a decrease in yield when in mixture with Lolium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1319 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with 98.2 kg/ha lower grain yield .
Qualifier100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Per 100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight, there was a grain yield decrease of 98.2 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–801 t0 “grain corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.