View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The higher N rate decrease d associated mungbean yield by 29–35%.
TreatmentN application rate was increased from 0 to 90 kg/ha e1 Outcomeyield of the associated mungbean e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with a corresponding decrease of 29–35% in the yield of the associated mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–547 e1 “N application rate was increased from 0 to 90 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–466 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage reduced water needs, yield variability and machinery use.
Outcomewater needs, decrease yield variability, and reduce machinery use e0 Comparatorconventional tillage (CT) e2 Verbatim
e0 “NT's ability to reduce water needs, decrease yield variability, and reduce machinery use (fuel, replacement, and repair costs) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1031 e1 “irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–129 e2 “compared with conventional tillage (CT) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The age-related decrease of net photosynthesis was delayed in solarised soil relative to control soil.
Treatmentsolarised soil e3 Outcomenet photosynthesis e3 Qualifierat near‐saturation light intensity e3 Verbatim
e3 “decrease of net photosynthesis at near‐saturation light intensity and of photochemical yield with ageing were delayed in plants growing in solarised soil as compared to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–890 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Carotenoid specific content did not decrease with each HPS flux increment.
Treatmenteach incremental increase in PPF from HPS lamps e0 Outcomecarotenoid specific content e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Chlorophyll, but not carotenoid specific content, decrease d with each incremental increase in PPF from HPS lamps. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1222 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wichita 3B decrease d winterhardiness.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in grain yield by WI 3B was due to a significant decrease in winterhardiness, resulting in decrease d seed weight and culms per square meter. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1284 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Marketable tuber yield fell 35.6% in the third field year.
Treatmentthird field year e1 Outcomemarketable tuber yields e0 Comparatorfirst field year e1 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease rates in marketable tuber yield s was 17.1 % and 35.6 % respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–644 e1 “third field year than in the first field year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–566 t0 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d photosynthetic active radiation significantly reduced seed yield per plant in mungbean.
TreatmentDecreased photosynthetic active radiation e2 Outcomeseed yield per plant e1 Directionsignificant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Mungbean grown as intercrop suffers shading stress form companion crop at different growth stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–106 e1 “there was a significant decrease in seed yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1101 e2 “Decrease d photosynthetic active radiation caused significant reduction in pods per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1035 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GC-72 yield increase was associated with a tendency for lower shoot Cl and Na ion content.
Outcomeshoot Cl and Na ion contents e0 Verbatim
e0 “The increase in yield of cv. GC-72 was associated with a tendency to decrease the shoot Cl and Na ion contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1098 e1 “Tomato seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–19 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
In simulated spring barley, total dry matter and yield decrease d if the temperature rise exceeded 2.7°C.
Treatmenttemperature rise exceeds 2.7°C e0 Outcometotal dry matter and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In spring barley the total dry matter and grain yield increase due to increasing CO2, but if temperature rise exceeds 2.7°C, total dry matter and yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–728 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest increased nonphotochemical quenching downregulated PSII electron transport yield .
Outcomequantum yield of PSII electron transport e0 Qualifiernon-photochemical quenching e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in the quantum yield of PSII electron transport in senescent leaves was downregulated by an increase in the proportion of QB-non-reducing PSII reaction centres and in the non-photochemical quenching ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1607 t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.