Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Live leafminer larval counts did not decrease in treated onions in the first season.

Taxon: Liriomyza sativaeLiriomyza sativaet0
Treatment: abanxclin-lreatcde0
Interactor: onionsAllium cepae0host
Outcome: counts of live leafminer larvaee0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Qualifier: In the first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the first season, although counts of live leafminer larvae did not decrease in abanxclin-lreatcd onions, green onion yield increased 71%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–526

t0
“Liriomyza sativae”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87

Title

Increased Green Onion Yields Associated with Abamectin Treatments for Liriomyza sativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)

Mike Kawate; Julia Coughlin ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) 1995

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Weekly abamectin applications significantly increased marketable onion yield.
Intervention effect Green onion yield increased 71% in the first season.
Intervention effect Leafminer pupal counts decreased in abamectin-treated onions during the second season.
Intervention effect Green onion yield increased 40% in the second season under abamectin treatment.
Intervention effect Abamectin effectively controlled L sativae in green onions.
Intervention effect Abamectin possibly had little or no effect on parasitoids.
Intervention effect Onion thrips injury was significantly lower in abamectin-treated plots than untreated controls.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye winter cover cropping appeared to reduce grain yield in one of two years.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: rye as a winter cover crope0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: one of two yre0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The use of rye as a winter cover crop appeared to decrease grain yield one of two yr”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–876

t0
“Corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–84

Title

The Effect of Rye Cover Crop and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Yield of Irrigated Corn and Residual Soil Nitrogen

B. A. Kliewer Journal of Agronomic Education 1991. doi:10.2134/jae1991.0065

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Excess nitrogen fertilizer did not increase yield or grain protein content.
Intervention effect Rye winter cover cropping had no significant effect on residual soil nitrogen.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased leaf ABA was most commonly associated with decreased stomatal conductance and grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Compound: L-ABAe0
Outcome: stomatal conductance and grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“an increase in L-ABA was most commonly associated with a decrease in both stomatal conductance and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–939

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–145

Title

QTL analysis of drought-related traits and grain yield in relation to genetic variation for leaf abscisic acid concentration in field-grown maize

M. C. Sanguineti; R. Tuberosa; P. Landi; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 1999. doi:10.1093/jxb/50.337.1289

Other claims from this paper (3)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polyphenol decrease did not affect organoleptic oil quality or shelf-life.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeat0
Compound: polyphenolse0
Outcome: oil quality in terms of organoleptic parameters or oil shelf-lifee0
Direction: did not influencee0
Qualifier: decrease of polyphenolse0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease of polyphenols did not influence the oil quality in terms of organoleptic parameters or oil shelf-life”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1807

t0
“olive (Olea europaeaL.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–96

Title

Yield and oil quality of intensively trained trees of three cultivars of olive (Olea europaeaL.) under different irrigation regimes

M. Patumi; R. D’Andria; G. Fontanazza; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1999. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511180

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation T3 soil water stayed near field capacity and did not differ from T2.
Observation Soil moisture decreased during summer under T0 and T1, reaching 20.8% in T0 on 12 August before rainfall restored field capacity.
Intervention effect Irrigated olive leaves had higher relative water content than rain-fed controls.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased yield in all olive cultivars compared with rain-fed controls.
Intervention effect T1 increased Nocellara del Belice olive yield by 200% versus rain-fed control.
Intervention effect T2 increased Ascolana tenera olive yield by 233% versus control.
Intervention effect T2 increased Kalamata olive yield by 47% versus control.
Intervention effect Irrigated olives had higher oil yield, mainly because fruit yield increased.
Observation Pulp-stone ratio and fruit triglyceride quantity were similar across irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Irrigation did not affect olive oil fatty acid composition.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased olive oil polyphenolic substance content.
Mechanism The authors attribute the polyphenol decrease to water-deficit-related enzymatic activity rather than fruit ripening.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield decreased over time for both tillage treatments and cover crops in the first five years.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: tillage treatments and cover cropse0
Outcome: tomato yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

t0
“strip-tillage on tomato yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–68

e0
“Results of the first 5 yr indicated a decrease in tomato yield over time for both tillage treatments and cover crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–530

Title

Long-term evaluation of cover crop and strip-tillage on tomato yield, foliar diseases and nematode populations

Alan W. McKeown; R. F. Cerkauskas; John W. Potter; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1998. doi:10.4141/p97-090

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 18 Mg subsoil compaction treatment tended to reduce yield at Webster.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: 18 Mg axle −1 treatmente0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: tended toe0
Setting: Webster sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Subsoil compaction from the 18 Mg axle −1 treatment reduced plant height and integrated leaf area index on the Webster site each year of the experiment, and tended to decrease yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1500

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7

Title

Soybean Growth and Yield as Affected by Surface and Suboil Compaction

J. F. Johnson; W. B. Voorhees; W. W. Nelson; et al. Agronomy Journal 1990. doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200050027x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Surface compaction reduced yield by 15% overall on Ves sites.
Intervention effect Surface compaction reduced Ves yield by up to 27% in a single year.
Intervention effect On the Webster site, surface compaction generally reduced yield in a wet year.
Intervention effect On the Webster site, surface compaction generally raised yield in a dry year.
Intervention effect The 18 Mg subsoil compaction treatment reduced plant height and leaf area index at Webster each year.
Observation The 18 Mg load had an inconsistent response on Ves.
Intervention effect The 9 Mg treatment significantly increased yield in five of fourteen location-years.
Intervention effect Annual surface compaction affected growth and yield more than one-time subsoil compaction.
Association Reduced vegetative growth did not necessarily produce a comparable seed yield reduction.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main tiller yields of induced plants did not decrease with increasing infection density.

Taxon: BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment: inducertreatede0
Outcome: yields of main tillerse0
Direction: not decreasede0

Verbatim

e0
“Despite an increasing infection density. yields of main tillers of inducertreated plants were not decreased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–603

t0
“Barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84

Title

Effects of Induced Resistance on Disease Severity/Yield Relations in Mildewed Barley

H. Kehlenbeck; F. Schönbeck Journal of Phytopathology 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.1995.tb00663.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting leaf groups tended to decrease photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratio in sugarbeet.

Taxon: sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment: leaf groups were cut upe4
Outcome: photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratioe4
Direction: tend to decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“By the method of cutting different leaf group from sugarbeet plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67

e4
“after leaf groups were cut up, the photosynthesis ratio, water usage efficiency and respiration ratio tend to decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1002

Title

Effect of Difference Resource Leaf to Yield and Qualityin Sugarbeet Groundcovered with Plastic Film

Wei Changzhou Xibei nongye xuebao 1999

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation The leaf groups contributed to root-tuber growth in a stated order.
Observation Leaf groups No.11-15 and No.31-35 are the most important function leaves of sugarbeet under plastic mulch in Shihezi region.
Intervention effect Early leaf loss resulted in a high root-crown proportion in sugarbeet.
Intervention effect Late leaf group loss decreased the root-crown ratio in sugarbeet.
Intervention effect Cutting No.11-15 leaves most significantly affected canopy apparent photosynthesis during leaf flourishing in sugarbeet.
Intervention effect Cutting No.31-35 leaves most significantly affected canopy apparent photosynthesis during sugar accumulation in sugarbeet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density reduced seed index and protein content.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: plant densitye0
Outcome: seed index, seed protein contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“cottonseed yield and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105

e0
“As plant density increased, there was a decrease in cottonseed yield/ha, seed index, seed protein content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–314

Title

Effect of plant population densities and application of growth retardants on cottonseed yield and quality

Zakaria M. Sawan; Ahmad E. Basyony; Willis L. McCuistion; et al. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 1993. doi:10.1007/bf02545314

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing plant density reduced cottonseed yield per hectare.
Intervention effect Increasing plant density reduced oil and protein yields per hectare.
Intervention effect Increasing plant density reduced oil refractive index, iodine value and unsaponifiable matter.
Intervention effect Increasing plant density reduced unsaturated fatty acids.
Intervention effect Increasing plant density raised oil acid and saponification values.
Intervention effect Increasing plant density raised saturated fatty acids.
Intervention effect Cycocel increased cottonseed yield and seed index.
Intervention effect Alar increased cottonseed yield and seed index.
Intervention effect Cycocel increased seed protein content and oil and protein yield.
Intervention effect Alar increased seed protein content and oil and protein yield.
Intervention effect Cycocel increased oil refractive index, iodine value and unsaponifiable matter.
Intervention effect Alar increased oil refractive index, iodine value and unsaponifiable matter.
Intervention effect Cycocel increased unsaturated fatty acids and reduced oil acid and saponification values.
Intervention effect Alar increased unsaturated fatty acids.
Intervention effect Oil acid and saponification values decreased with growth retardant application.
Association Cottonseed yield did not differ among application rates of either chemical.
Intervention effect Cycocel at 750 ppm produced the highest oil and protein yield per hectare, followed by Alar at 250 ppm.
Intervention effect Cycocel at 250 ppm gave the highest refractive index and unsaponifiable matter and the lowest acid value.
Intervention effect Alar at 250 ppm gave the highest iodine value and lowest saponification value.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millie head rice decreased linearly as seeding rate decreased.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Material: Milliee0
Treatment: seeding ratee0
Outcome: head ricee0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was a linear decrease in head rice as seeding rate decreased for Millie”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1005

t0
“Rough Rice Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–40

Title

Seeding Rate Effects on Rough Rice Yield, Head Rice, and Total Milled Rice

Kenneth A. Gravois; Ronnie S. Helms Agronomy Journal 1996. doi:10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800010017x

Other claims from this paper (8)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics