View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density reduced yield in only one year.
Treatment4.4 plants per m2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in yield with an increase in plant density from 2.7 to 4.4 plants per m2 was found in only one year. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–672 t0 “Brussels sprouts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–86 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area and shoot yield declined as leaf number fell with rising air temperature.
Outcomesainfoin leaf area per plant and shoot yield per plant e0 QualifierLeaves per plant e1 Verbatim
e0 “this caused a decrease in sainfoin leaf area per plant and shoot yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–917 e1 “Leaves per plant decrease d with increasing air temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–832 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease d only slightly despite low leaf lamina area index.
Treatmentreduction of leaf lamina area index to as low as 0·5 e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Despite reduction of leaf lamina area index to as low as 0·5, the decrease in grain yield was small ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–770 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Blocking larval access prevented a decline in nodulation and yield .
Treatmentaccess of larvae to the nodules was impeded e0 Outcomenodulation or yield e0 Not reported Interactor Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 e0 “There was no decrease in nodulation or yield when access of larvae to the nodules was impeded. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–708 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat-susceptible cowpea yield fell 12% per degree above 20°C at night.
MaterialHeat‐susceptible genotypes e0 Outcomefirst‐flush grain yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Heat‐susceptible genotypes exhibited a 12% decrease in first‐flush grain yield per degree centigrade increase in average night temperature above 20°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–721 t0 “Cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Berseem clover organic matter yield declined less rapidly than corn residues.
Outcomeorganic matter yield e0 Directiondid not decrease as rapidly e0 Comparatorcorn crop residues e0 Verbatim
e0 “Initial organic matter yield of berseem clover was nearly that of corn crop residues and did not decrease as rapidly as corn crop residues. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–799 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The largest model uncertainty was the start of the senescent decline in canopy quantum yield .
Outcomepredicting a start time for the senescent decrease of canopy quantum yield e0 Directionmost uncertainty e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The most uncertainty arose in predicting a start time for the senescent decrease of canopy quantum yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1063 e1 “for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–310 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under irrigation, radiation interception decrease d as nitrogen declined and accounted for the main yield differences.
Outcomeradiation interception e0 Verbatim
e0 “the main source of differences in yield was a decrease in radiation interception with decreasing N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1148 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Leaf expansion was strongly influenced by water and nitrogen. Intervention effect Specific leaf area was almost independent of treatment. Intervention effect Under irrigation, the biomass radiation coefficient was nearly independent of nitrogen application and measured 1·3–1·4 g/MJ. Association Under irrigation, the biomass radiation coefficient was independent of leaf nitrogen. Intervention effect Without irrigation, biomass was maximal at 60 kg/ha nitrogen. Intervention effect Without irrigation, yield was maximal at 60 kg/ha nitrogen in the reported joint result. Intervention effect Without irrigation, the biomass radiation coefficient was maximal at 60 kg/ha nitrogen. Intervention effect Without irrigation, leaf nitrogen was maximal at 60 kg/ha nitrogen. Intervention effect At 33 days after emergence, root mass was almost independent of nitrogen under either water treatment. Intervention effect At 33 days after emergence, root mass was somewhat smaller with irrigation. Intervention effect Later root, leaf and panicle mass responded to nitrogen and water. Intervention effect With irrigation, stem mass was unresponsive to nitrogen. Observation Stem to grain translocation was evident in most treatments. Intervention effect Irrigated sorghum achieved maximum grain yield of 4·8 t/ha at 150 kg/ha nitrogen. Intervention effect Without irrigation, maximum grain yield was 3·2 t/ha at 90 kg/ha nitrogen. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A group of four cultivars had 19.9% lower second year grazing yield than first year yield .
MaterialOne group of four cultivars e0 Comparatorthe first year e0 Verbatim
e0 “One group of four cultivars had a decrease in yield of 19.9% in the second year of grazing, over the first year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1161 t0 “orchardgrass cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Adair head rice decrease d quadratically as seeding rate decrease d.
Verbatim
e0 “a quadratic decrease in head rice as seeding rate decrease d for Adair ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1076 t0 “Rough Rice Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–40 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.