View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield reduction was mainly due to fewer grains per panicle.
Qualifierdecrease in number of grains per panicle e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield reduction was mainly due to a decrease in number of grains per panicle ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1352 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton yield decrease d 40% in check west versus 1992.
Verbatim
e0 “a 40% decrease in check west ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1430 e1 “increase in yield in the program area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1369 e2 “as compared to 1992 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1450 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Lodging of intercropped soybean may be due to the significant decrease in stem NDF.
Qualifiersignificant decrease in stem NDF e4 Verbatim
e4 “Intercropped soybean was lodged both years more than monocrop soybean, which may have been due to the significant decrease in stem NDF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1450 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The largest decrease in F2 was in single crosses, followed by three way cross, double cross and composite varieties.
Outcomeamount of decrease e1 Qualifierfollowed three way cross, double cross and composite varieties e1 Verbatim
e0 “dent corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–121 e1 “Generally the highest amount of decrease was found in the single crosses, followed three way cross, double cross and composite varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–907 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CPPU spraying decrease d cumulative yield over two years.
Outcomecumulative yield e0 QualifierOver the two-year period e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “AVOCADO CV HASS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e0 “Over the two-year period, CPPU treated trees showed a decrease in cumulative yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–223 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease d with increasing row width.
Value3497, 3250, 2920 kg/ha e0 Verbatim
e0 “A linear decrease with increasing row width was observed for grain yield (3497, 3250, 2920 kg/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–946 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Direct-drilling through chopped straw did not decrease winter wheat yield on the clay soil.
TreatmentDirect‐drilling through chopped straw e0 Directionbut not on the clay soil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Direct‐drilling through chopped straw decrease d yield on the silt loam but not on the clay soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–771 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–111 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing preemergence fluometuron from banded to broadcast coverage produced a further decrease in weed biomass.
Treatmentpreemergence fluometuron was increased from banded to broadcast coverage e1 OutcomeA further decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 e1 “A further decrease was observed when preemergence fluometuron was increased from banded to broadcast coverage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–686 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed interference decrease d seeds and grain yield per plant.
Outcomeseeds/plant, grain yield/plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease idry mauer/plant, branches/plant, pods/plants, seeds/plant, grain yield /plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–562 t0 “Weed Competition in Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 decrease d hybrid rice grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “GA3 treatment could increase 1000-grain weight with low seed-setting rate, eventually decrease the grain yield of hybrid rice. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–425 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.