View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
15000 R irradiation decrease d pea yield .
treatment with 15000 R e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “treatment with 15000 R led to a decrease of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–291 t0 “PEAS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d barley grain yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water deficit caused a decrease in both grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination (Δ). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–336 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The awnletted TAM 107 population had significantly decrease d yield .
awnletted TAM 107 population e0 Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease in yield was found for the awnletted TAM 107 population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1216 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
ALV infection dramatically decrease d yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a dramatic decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–544 e1 “ALV infection caused qualitative and quantitative changes ‘Brindisino’ artichoke ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–377 t0 “Artichoke Latent Virus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–33 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High P and zero Zn application was predicted to decrease corn yield .
high P‐ and zero ‐Zn application e0 calcareous soils e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With the high P‐ and zero ‐Zn application (higher P/Zn) which is a common practice in calcareous soils, zinc deficiency symptoms will be observed and yield will he decrease d accordingly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1765 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
NaCl decrease d substandard fruit yield .
NaCl treatments e1 substandard fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in substandard fruit yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1628 e1 “the NaCl treatments with an enhancement of commercial and also total fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1585 t0 “zucchini ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean mango yield loss improved to 53% in 1991.
Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield decrease was 83 % during 1989 which relatively improved in later years and were 58% in 1990, 53% in 1991 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–806 t0 “MANGO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Reducing broadcast N enough to lower cured leaf yield by 10% would lower unaccounted N by 80 to 115 kg per hectare.
Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer e0 unaccounted fertilizer N e0 80 to 115 kg N ha −1 e0 10% decrease in air‐cured leaf yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air‐cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1777 t0 “Burley Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–57 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizing for maximum root yield cut early September return by $3l/acre.
maximum root yield e3 10–16 September e0 maximum net return e3 Verbatim
e0 “a $3l/acre decrease ($576 vs. $545) in the earliest (10–16 September) period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4755–4831 t0 “sugarbeet ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 59–68 e3 “fertilizing for maximum root yield (vs. maximum net return) required 78 to 88 lb/acre of additional N ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4476–4577 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No decrease in vegetative phytomass was recorded in the modern cultivars.
modern cultivars e0 vegetative phytomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “No decrease in vegetative phytomass in modern cultivars was recorded in this study ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1066 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lathyrus oleraceust0.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Zea mays subsp. mays
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris