View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Copper treatment slightly decrease d onion yield without statistical significance.
Treatmentcopper treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “copper treatment resulted in a slight, but not significant, yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–747 e1 “onion yield (Allium cepa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
BA decrease d yield of Redchief Delicious by an average of 5%.
TaxonRedchief Delicious e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “response of `Redchief Delicious' over several years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–342 e2 “Over 4 years, BA averaged a 5% decrease in yield , a 15% increase in large fruit and a 21% decrease in small fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–977 Other claims from this paper (16) Association author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d quantum yield of PSII electron transport was associated with decrease d PSII photochemistry rate constant.
Outcomequantum yield of PSII electron transport e0 Qualifierrate constant of PSII photochemistry e0 Not reported Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in the quantum yield of PSII electron transport was associated with a decrease in the rate constant of PSII photochemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1349 t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Climate scenarios projected decrease d maize yield in southwestern Japan.
Settingsouthwestern Japan e0 Verbatim
e0 “maize yield is expected to increase in Hokkaido, but change little in central Japan, and decrease in southwestern Japan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1672 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early drought significantly lowered fruit yield .
TreatmentT–1 drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The T–1 drought stress also induced a significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–992 t0 “apricot trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Essential oil yield decrease d as irrigation-to-harvest intervals increased.
Outcomeessential oil yield e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The green yield and essential oil yield decrease as the intervals increase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–378 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The fast phase of the increase in oxygen yield was coupled to a decrease of fluorescence in intact leaves.
Organ / stageintact leaves e3 Verbatim
t0 “ADAPTATION OF HIGHER PLANTS TO CHANGING LIGHT INTENSITIES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–68 e2 “The fast phase of the increase in oxygen yield was coupled to a decrease of fluorescence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–515 e3 “The short‐term adaptation of intact leaves to an increase in light intensity was studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–98 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean mango yield loss improved to 58% in 1990.
Verbatim
e0 “The mean yield decrease was 83 % during 1989 which relatively improved in later years and were 58% in 1990 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–793 t0 “MANGO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ungulate foraging did not significantly decrease winter wheat grain yield .
Treatmentbig game grazing e0 Interactorungulate e2 herbivore Directiondid not significantly decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “The effects of big game grazing of winter wheat on grain yield were studied during 12 trials in northern Utah between 1990-92 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 e1 “plots protected and variously grazed by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus ), pronghorn (Antilocapra americana ) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–345 e2 “Results indicated that ungulate foraging in these trials did not significantly decrease grain yield s despite high utilization percentages on wheat leaves in fall and early spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–830 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
These treatments did not decrease fruit quality.
TreatmentThese treatments e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tomato Fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–102 e0 “These treatments increased the marketable yield significantly and did not decrease the fruit quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–622 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.