View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 58% population decrease caused only a 12% soybean yield decrease .
Treatment58% population decrease e0 Comparator164 000 plants ha −l e0 Verbatim
e0 “A 58% population decrease from 164 000 plants ha −l resulted in a yield decrease of only 12% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–972 e1 “Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
KCl tended to decrease yield in all cultivars.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In KCl treatment yield tended to decrease in all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Damage around tasseling-anthesis caused the greatest yield decrease in forage maize.
Organ / stagetasseling‐anthesis e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Decrease of yield was the highest when treatments were applied around tasseling‐anthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–335 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pods per plant were chiefly responsible for yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the component most responsible for yield decrease was the number of pods per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1030 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–137 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease of wheat increased with subsoil Al.
Verbatim
e0 “toxicity on wheat growth were studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–149 e3 “the yield decrease increased with subsoil Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–979 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield tended to decrease with wider rows and narrower spacing within rows.
Verbatim
e0 “yield tended to decrease with wider row widths and narrower within row spacings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–969 e1 “soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–68 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield .
Directiondid not decrease e0 Qualifierfoliar damage alone e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield but decrease d straw yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The UKMO scenario was unfavourable and showed a considerable yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the UKMO scenario is not favorable, showing a considerable yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–909 e1 “rice, maize and wheat production in Japan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–124 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The grain yield decrease in Ant-Pop was insignificant.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in the grain yield of Ant-Pop cultivar was insignificiant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–606 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in F′v/F′m and qP explains the decrease in the actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport in senescing wheat leaves
Outcomeactual quantum yield of PSII electron transport e3 Qualifierdecrease in both e3 Verbatim
e0 “Analyses of chlorophyll fluorescence were undertaken to investigate the alterations in photosystem II (PSII) function during senescence of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Shannong 229) leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192 e3 “The decrease in both F' v /F' m and q P explained the decrease in the actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1103 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield reductions under quackgrass were mainly attributed to a decrease of spike density (author interpretation).
Outcomeyield reductions e1 Qualifiera decrease of spike density e1 Verbatim
e1 “These yield reductions were mainly attributed to a decrease of spike density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–733 e2 “and barley (Hordeum vulgare L. 'Cadette') ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The reduction in tomato fruit yield was attributed to a decrease in fruit weight.
Qualifiera decrease in fruit weight e2 Verbatim
t0 “single-truss tomato grown in hydroponics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–107 e2 “The reduction in fruit yield was due to a decrease in fruit weight but not in fruit number ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–566 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maintaining a high proportion of double-flowered plants may decrease seed yield .
Verbatim
e0 “maintaining a high percentage of plants with double-flowered capitula may decrease seed yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–933 t0 “Zinnia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A grower could accept a tomato yield decrease if quality increases sufficiently.
Outcomeaccept a decrease in yield e0 Qualifierif there were a sufficient increment in quality of the product e0 Verbatim
t0 “GREENHOUSE TOMATO CROP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–97 e0 “a grower could accept a decrease in yield if there were a sufficient increment in quality of the product ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2416–2520 Other claims from this paper (12) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors favor frequent irrigation to decrease surface relocation of water, despite only slight yield gains.
OutcomeFrequent irrigation intervals e0 Qualifierdecrease surface relocation of water e0 Verbatim
e0 “Frequent irrigation intervals added only slightly to yield but are desirable in order to decrease surface relocation of water from high intensity LEPA application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2213 t0 “Grain Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
EPIC projected a corn yield decrease under the coarse scenario.
Comparatorcoarse scenario e0 Not reported Outcome Value
Verbatim
e0 “EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 t0 “for wheat and corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The SDI models indicated a linear decline in relative yield with increasing wetness.
Directionlinear decrease e0 Comparatorincreasing wetness (SDI values) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The SDI models indicated a linear decrease in the relative yield with increasing wetness (SDI values) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–924 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Y/M selection substantially decrease d grain moisture.
Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “had a large decrease in grain moisture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1454 e1 “The Y/M selection differential for yield was only 64% of that of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1410 t0 “Selection Criteria for Grain Yield and Moisture in Maize Yield Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.