Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material: 70W 18-14e0
Treatment: delayed harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0. 18e0
Qualifier: 1980e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Egret and 70W 18- 14 wheat decreased with delayed harvest in 1979 and 1980, the rate of decrease being (%/d) 0.53 and 0.49, respectively, for Egret, and 0.53 and 0. 18 for 70W 18-14”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–754

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid caused a fivefold greater early pH drop than equivalent sulphur, but was short-lived.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: 800 l ha-1 sulphuric acide0
Outcome: decrease in pHe0
Direction: greatere0
Value: five timese0
Qualifier: short-livede0
Comparator: equivalent amount of elemsntal sulphure0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in pH at 3 weeks after the application of 800 l ha-1 sulphuric acid was five times greater than that due to an equivalent amount of elemsntal sulphur, but the effect of the acid was short-lived”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1521

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65

Title

Effect of sulphur, sulphuric acid and gypsum on the yield of rice on the Cununurra soils of the Ord Irrigation Area, Western Australia

AL Chapman Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1980. doi:10.1071/ea9800724

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Sulphur lowered soil pH temporarily.
Intervention effect Sulphuric acid lowered soil pH temporarily.
Intervention effect Sulphur improved seedling establishment and mean grain yield.
Intervention effect Sulphuric acid improved seedling establishment.
Intervention effect Sulphur increased mean grain yield from 4.27 to 5.32 t ha-1.
Intervention effect Sulphuric acid increased mean grain yield from 4.27 to 5.32 t ha-1.
Intervention effect Early rice growth was better with sulphur or acid.
Intervention effect Transient iron chlorosis was largely eliminated.
Intervention effect Gypsum had no significant effect on soil pH, establishment, early growth or yield.
Observation Flooded soil pH varied across untreated and ameliorant plots.
Association Mean grain yield rose linearly as flooded soil pH fell.
Observation Sulphur and acid lowered air-dried soil pH by 0.5 to 2 units.
Intervention effect Sulphur raised calcium and magnesium in soil extracts.
Intervention effect Gypsum raised calcium and magnesium in soil extracts.
Intervention effect All ameliorants increased nitrogen in rice tops after three weeks.
Intervention effect Sulphur increased other mineral concentrations on at least one date.
Intervention effect Sulphuric acid increased other mineral concentrations on at least one date.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing up to four inflorescences caused a loss of yield potential of up to 65% in field beans relative to untreated control plants.

Taxon: field beanst0
Treatment: removal of up to four inflorescences from basal, central or apical nodese0
Outcome: yield potentiale0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: up to 65%e0
Comparator: untreated control plantse0

Verbatim

t0
“field beans (Vicia faba L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–48

e0
“In comparison with untreated control plants the removal of up to four inflorescences from basal, central or apical nodes caused a loss of yield potential of up to 65%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–624

Title

Yield performance of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in relation to interactions between inflorescences at different nodes

W. Aufhammer; Isabella Götz; Maria Peter The Journal of Agricultural Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0021859600079521

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Clippere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.67e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Clippere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.75e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Clippere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.46e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Dampiere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.65e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Dampiere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.42e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.25 %/d.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material: Dampiere0
Treatment: delay in harveste0
Outcome: Grain yieldse0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.25e0
Qualifier: the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yields of Clipper and Dampier barley decreased with increasing delay in harvest, the rates of decrease (%/d) in the three years being 0.67, 0.75 and 0.46, respectively, for Clipper, and 0.65, 0.42 and 0.25 for Dampier”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–555

Title

Grain losses due to delayed harvesting of barley and wheat

MDA Bolland Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1984. doi:10.1071/ea9840391

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.67 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.75 %/d.
Intervention effect Clipper barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1981 at 0.46 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.65 %/d.
Intervention effect Dampier barley grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.42 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0.49 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Intervention effect 70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1980 at 0. 18 %/d.
Intervention effect Egret wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.
Intervention effect Madden wheat grain yield did not change significantly with harvesting delayed up to 63 days in 1981.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminating irrigation too early in August showed a slight detrimental trend in cotton yield or lint quality on Sharkey clay.

Taxon: Gossypium hirsutum LGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: terminated too early in Auguste1
Outcome: yield or lint qualitye1
Direction: detrimental trende1
Qualifier: slighte1
Setting: Sharkey claye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80

e1
“The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928

Title

Improving Irrigation Scheduling and Water use Efficiency in Cotton

Derrick M. Oosterhuis Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 1989

Other claims from this paper (6)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics