View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Pea gravel substrate produced the greatest flower yield .
Treatmentpea gravel substrate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Gerbera jamesonii (Bolus), cvs. Amethyst, Friendship, and Mandrin, was 90% greater in root zone-heated media compared to nonheated substrates. Root zone heating also attributed to an overall 15% increase in stem length, but only a 4% nonsignificant decrease in flower diameter. The greatest flower yield , longest stems, and largest-diameter flowers were produced by plants grown in the pea gravel substrate. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–449 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest after the optimum date lost 33 kg per ha per week in 1980.
TreatmentDelay in harvesting after this date e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip (Pastinaca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–127 e1 “Delay in harvesting after this date led to a loss of yield of 33, 35, 139 and 32 kg ha ‐1 wk ‐1 in 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1403 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest after the optimum date lost 35 kg per ha per week in 1981.
TreatmentDelay in harvesting after this date e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip (Pastinaca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–127 e1 “Delay in harvesting after this date led to a loss of yield of 33, 35, 139 and 32 kg ha ‐1 wk ‐1 in 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1403 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest after the optimum date lost 139 kg per ha per week in 1982.
TreatmentDelay in harvesting after this date e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip (Pastinaca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–127 e1 “Delay in harvesting after this date led to a loss of yield of 33, 35, 139 and 32 kg ha ‐1 wk ‐1 in 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1403 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying harvest after the optimum date lost 32 kg per ha per week in 1983.
TreatmentDelay in harvesting after this date e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “parsnip (Pastinaca sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–127 e1 “Delay in harvesting after this date led to a loss of yield of 33, 35, 139 and 32 kg ha ‐1 wk ‐1 in 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1403 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants damaged in the fall appeared to recover.
Outcomeappeared to recover e5 Verbatim
e0 “hard red winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–217 e5 “Plants damaged in the fall appeared to recover, but ultimately exhibited a marked decrease in grain yield at spring harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–754 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temperature changed only slightly with depth under millet husk.
Settingunder millet husk e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in temperature with depth was noticed under polyethylene while there were minor changes under millet husk. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–565 t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In the 1978 season, yield losses of 31% occurred for the three chile cultivars for each 10-fold increase in the initial M. incognita population.
Treatmenteach 10-fold increase in the initial population of M. incognita e1 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield losses of 31% for the 1978 season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–563 e1 “for each 10-fold increase in the initial population of M. incognita ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–683 e2 “microplot data from a sandy loam soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–516 e3 “chile (Capsicum annuum ) cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–117 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments did not consistently affect potato stem numbers or yield
TreatmentSeed treatments e3 Directionno_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Seed treatments did not consistently affect stem numbers or increase yield although all treatments tended to decrease tuber size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–731 e0 “Potato seed tubers of six cultivars from commercial stocks and from stocks derived from stem cuttings (healthier seed) were fumigated with 2‐aminobutane 2 wk after lifting or treated with benomyl or thiabendazole in January ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–231 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
70W 18-14 wheat grain yield declined with delayed harvest in 1979 at 0.53 %/d.
Treatmentdelayed harvest e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield s of Egret and 70W 18- 14 wheat decrease d with delayed harvest in 1979 and 1980, the rate of decrease being (%/d) 0.53 and 0.49, respectively, for Egret, and 0.53 and 0. 18 for 70W 18-14 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–754 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.