View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation at the open corolla stage in greenhouse studies significantly decrease d marketable tomato yield compared with uninoculated control.
Organ / stageopen corolla stage e0 Treatmentinoculation at e1 Outcomemarketable yield e0 Comparatoruninoculated control e3 Settinggreenhouse studies e1 Verbatim
t0 “Susceptibility of Tomato Fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–66 e0 “the open corolla stage resulted in a significant decrease in marketable yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–700 e1 “In greenhouse studies, inoculation at ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–547 e2 “Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (= P. tomato ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–365 e3 “uninjured tomato fruit are most susceptible to infection by P. syringae compared to the uninoculated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–814 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants lowered P leaching loss by 4.4% on average.
Treatmentpresence of plants t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “P, 4.4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–717 t0 “begonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 t1 “In the presence of plants, the average decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–647 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants lowered Ca leaching loss by 0.5% on average.
Treatmentpresence of plants t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ca, 0.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–727 t0 “begonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 t1 “In the presence of plants, the average decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–647 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants lowered Mg leaching loss by 0.3% on average.
Treatmentpresence of plants t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mg, 0.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–737 t0 “begonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 t1 “In the presence of plants, the average decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–647 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants lowered K leaching loss by 1.3% on average.
Treatmentpresence of plants t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “K, 1.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–750 t0 “begonia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 t1 “In the presence of plants, the average decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–647 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Low-oxygen enhancement increased toward physiological maturity, chiefly as photosynthesis decrease d.
Organ / stagephysiological maturity e0 OutcomePercentage enhancement e0 Qualifierbecause of a decrease in photosynthesis e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Percentage enhancement did, however increase as the plants approached physiological maturity, chiefly because of a decrease in photosynthesis. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–733 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage decrease d corn yield s on Hoytville soil by an annual mean 503 kg ha −1.
Verbatim
e0 “The average yearly corn yield increase and decrease due to no‐tillage on the Wooster and the Hoytville soils were 1070 kg ha −1 and 503 kg ha −1 , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1292 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated weekly 50% defoliation decrease d pole bean yield by approximately 34%.
TreatmentRepeated weekly defoliation of 50% e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “‘McCaslan 42’ pole bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–69 e1 “Repeated weekly defoliation of 50% resulted in yield losses of approximately 34% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–484 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed lower pod protein under salinity to reduced protein production efficiency.
Outcomepod protein content e0 Qualifierdecrease in the efficiency of pod protein production percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “The depressive effect of salinity on the pod protein content seemed to be due to the decrease in the efficiency of pod protein production percent rather than to the decrease in the incorporation of amino acids into protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1857 t0 “soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–83 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Regression analyses described the ozone and yield relationship.
Outcomemodels describing this relationship e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “regression analyses provided models describing this relationship ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1071 e1 “Stoneville 213 was sensitive to O 3 ‐induced yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1002 e2 “cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–399 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.