View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Other yield components decrease d and offset the ear advantage.
Outcomeother yield components e0 Verbatim
e0 “this advantage was nullified by a compensating decrease in the other yield components. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–865 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At low altitude 28-day irrigation intervals in August and September did not decrease yield .
TreatmentFewer irrigations than commonly used e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 QualifierAugust and September e0 Comparatorcommonly used e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fewer irrigations than commonly used on Pima cotton during August and September (28 days between irrigations) did not decrease yield s and, in some cases, significantly increased yield s of all cultivars at low altitude. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1307 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of C1421 did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum.
Treatmenta 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum e1 Directiondid not vary significantly e1 Verbatim
e0 “Three soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] strains were evaluated in approximately equidistant spacings at 14 population densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 e1 “Yield of C1421, which was most sensitive to high populations, did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1140 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Early lodging was a major factor contributing to the soybean yield decrease at higher seeding rates.
Treatmenthigher seeding rates e4 Qualifierearly lodging was a major factor e4 Verbatim
e1 “The effect of planting date, variety, row spacing, and seeding rate on lodging and seed yield of soybeans ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in highly productive environments was studied at Ashland and Chenoa, Illinois, in 1969. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–228 e4 “These results indicated that early lodging was a major factor contributing to the yield decrease that occurred at the higher seeding rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–775 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Planting date, variety, row spacing and seeding rate had highly significant effects on lodging and yield of soybeans at both locations. Intervention effect Seed yield of soybeans was generally unaffected by seeding rate where no lodging differential occurred. Intervention effect Seed yield of soybeans tended to be significantly lower where higher seeding rates caused severe early lodging. Association Whether a lodging differential occurred between seeding rates depended on location, date, variety and row spacing. Mechanism Lodging may be an important factor in preventing soybean yield increases from earlier planting and from narrower rows. Intervention effect At Ashland, in the absence of a lodging differential between dates, the highest soybean yields were obtained from the earliest planting. Intervention effect At Chenoa, where the first two planting dates were more severely lodged than the latest planting date, earlier planting gave no soybean yield advantage. Intervention effect The yield advantage of narrow rows in soybean was greatest for the third planting date, at both locations, where lodging was essentially the same in both row spacings. Intervention effect At the earlier planting dates, soybean 17‐cm rows tended to be more severely lodged than 50‐cm rows. Mechanism The more severe lodging in 17‐cm soybean rows was attributed in part to less effective natural thinning. Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower postflowering yield was associated with lower stand density.
Organ / stagestand density e0 Outcomepost‐flowering yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in post‐flowering yield was associated with a decrease in stand density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–728 t0 “Tall Fescue and Orchardgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Heavier seed weight partly, and sometimes fully, compensated for the potential yield decrease caused by shading-reduced seed number.
Qualifiercompensated for part, and sometimes all, of the potential yield decrease e5 Verbatim
e0 “‘Georgia 615’ grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) was shaded for weekly periods in three field experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 e5 “When number of seed per panicle was reduced by shading, heavier seed weight compensated for part, and sometimes all, of the potential yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1232 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel at 1.12 or 2.24 kg/ha applied at heading does not decrease wheat yield .
Organ / stageheading stage e1 Treatment1.12 and 2.24 kg rates e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) and spring oats ( Avena sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–400 e1 “The 1.12 and 2.24 kg rates applied at heading stage did not decrease yield but were less effective in reducing height and lodging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1148 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The spike increase exceeded the kernel decrease and raised overall yield .
Treatmentrate of seeding e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the increase in the number of spikes per hectare was greater than the accompanying decrease in kernels per spike, resulting in a net overall increase in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–663 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 28–40 t1 “RATE AND DATE OF SEEDING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–34 e1 “Highest net yield s were obtained with rate of seeding 134 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–276 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation did not decrease the Pelshenke value.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 e0 “Irrigation did not decrease the Pelshenke value ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1672 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Trebling the legume seed sown under the crop caused only a small further decrease in wheat yield , of less than one bushel per acre, in most cases.
Treatmenttrebling the amount of legume seed sown under the crop e1 Valueless than one bushel per acre e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “trebling the amount of legume seed sown under the crop greatly increased legume seed yield but caused only a small (less than one bushel per acre) further decrease in wheat yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1024 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.