View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High ambient ozone caused a significant decrease in tomato fruit size over time.
TreatmentHigh ambient ozone e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Reduction of Tomato Fruit Size and Yield by Ozone1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 e2 “High ambient ozone depressed production and caused a significant decrease in fruit size over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–558 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Initial populations of several named nematodes did not decrease cereal yield .
InteractorTylenchus Bastian e0 pest Outcomeyield of cereals e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 QualifierParatylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perry e0 Verbatim
e0 “initial populations of Tylenchus Bastian, Paratylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perry did not decrease yield of cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–287 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence that fungal diseases were involved in the herbage yield decrease at Rothamsted.
Outcomeno evidence that fungal diseases were involved e1 Verbatim
t0 “Grass Swards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 e1 “There was no evidence that fungal diseases were involved ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1182 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A critical N content of 1.3% (dry basis) in the outer leaves gave a 50% decrease in cabbage-head yield .
Outcomecabbage-head yield e0 Qualifierin the outer leaves e0 Verbatim
t0 “The role of macronutrients for cabbage-head formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e0 “The critical N, P, and K contents in the outer leaves which resulted in a 50% decrease in the cabbage-head yield due to each deficiency were 1.3, 0.1. and 0.3% on a dry basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–387 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A critical P content of 0.1% (dry basis) in the outer leaves gave a 50% decrease in cabbage-head yield .
Outcomecabbage-head yield e0 Qualifierin the outer leaves e0 Verbatim
t0 “The role of macronutrients for cabbage-head formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e0 “The critical N, P, and K contents in the outer leaves which resulted in a 50% decrease in the cabbage-head yield due to each deficiency were 1.3, 0.1. and 0.3% on a dry basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–387 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A critical K content of 0.3% (dry basis) in the outer leaves gave a 50% decrease in cabbage-head yield .
Outcomecabbage-head yield e0 Qualifierin the outer leaves e0 Verbatim
t0 “The role of macronutrients for cabbage-head formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 e0 “The critical N, P, and K contents in the outer leaves which resulted in a 50% decrease in the cabbage-head yield due to each deficiency were 1.3, 0.1. and 0.3% on a dry basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–387 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The mean yield of the 28 spring wheat crosses decrease d by 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity.
Treatmentdecrease in heterozygosity e1 Outcomemean yield of the 28 crosses e1 Verbatim
e0 “Eight adapted high‐ yield ing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) parents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e1 “The mean yield of the 28 crosses decrease d at a linear rate of 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity with a maximum rate of 0.4% in one cross ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1465 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nectariless Stoneville 7A had 4.3% lower yield .
Material‘Stoneville 7A’ e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A slight decrease (4.3%) in yield for nectariless ‘Stoneville 7A’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–273 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The relative decrease in yield from frequent cutting was greatest in late spring.
TaxonHunter River lucerne e0 Outcomerelative decrease e6 Verbatim
e0 “Hunter River lucerne, sown in April, June, and August ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 e6 “The relative decrease was greatest when standard cut plants were growing most rapidly in late spring, and it was also greater with wide spacing than close spacing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–737 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum rate of yield decrease with heterozygosity was 0.4% in one spring wheat cross.
Treatmentheterozygosity e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
e0 “Eight adapted high‐ yield ing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) parents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e1 “The mean yield of the 28 crosses decrease d at a linear rate of 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity with a maximum rate of 0.4% in one cross ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1465 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.