Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captafol controlled potato scab as effectively as quintozene.

Treatment
captafole0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabiesStreptomyces scabieit1pathogen
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
as effective ase0
Comparator
quintozenee0

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51
t1

“Streptomyces scabies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–112

Title

Glasshouse tests of chemicals for control of potato common scab

A. H. MCINTOSH Annals of Applied Biology 1973. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb01324.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short photoperiod reduced grain yield depending on seedling age and exposure duration.

Treatment
short photoperiode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
age at which the short photoperiod was administered and the duration of the treatmente0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“It significantly decreased the grain yield from that of the controls, the decrease depending on the age at which the short photoperiod was administered and the duration of the treatment given at each age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1302
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57

Title

Interaction of Photoperiodic Dosage and Plant Age on Rice. I. Effects of Short Photoperiod on a Late-Winter Rice

G. Misra; P. A. Khan Botanical Gazette 1973. doi:10.1086/336686

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First-brood damage by southwestern corn borer caused a yield loss of 20 percent in corn.

Treatment
First‐brood larval feedinge1
Interactor
southwestern corn borersDiatraea grandiosellae0pest
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
20e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“damage to corn ( Zea mays L.) caused by infestation with southwestern corn borers ( Diatraea grandiosella Dyar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–134
e1

“First‐brood larval feeding significantly reduced plant height by an average of 16 cm over the 2 years of the test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–376
e2

“Significant yield losses of 20 and 9% occurred from first‐ and second‐brood damage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–474

Title

Effect of Southwestern Corn Borer Feeding on Maize1

Gene E. Scott; Frank M. Davis Agronomy Journal 1974. doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600060016x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe common root rot plants had a 59% grain yield loss compared with clean plants.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
severee2
Outcome
losses in grain yielde3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
59%e3
Comparator
cleane2

Verbatim

e0

“common root rot (Cochliobolus sativus) on plant biomass and grain yield in naturally infected Triticum aestivum cultivar Manitou were studied at Matador, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–181
e2

“Overall mean biomass losses at maturity in severe, moderate, and slight plants as compared with clean were 58%, 37%, and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–991
e3

“losses in grain yield were 59%, 38%, and 26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1051

Title

The epidemiology of common root rot in Manitou wheat. IV. Appraisal of biomass and grain yield in naturally infected crops

P. R. Verma; R. A. A. Morrall; R. D. Tinline Canadian Journal of Botany 1976. doi:10.1139/b76-178

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate common root rot plants had a 38% grain yield loss compared with clean plants.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
moderatee2
Outcome
losses in grain yielde3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
38%e3
Comparator
cleane2

Verbatim

e0

“common root rot (Cochliobolus sativus) on plant biomass and grain yield in naturally infected Triticum aestivum cultivar Manitou were studied at Matador, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–181
e2

“Overall mean biomass losses at maturity in severe, moderate, and slight plants as compared with clean were 58%, 37%, and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–991
e3

“losses in grain yield were 59%, 38%, and 26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1051

Title

The epidemiology of common root rot in Manitou wheat. IV. Appraisal of biomass and grain yield in naturally infected crops

P. R. Verma; R. A. A. Morrall; R. D. Tinline Canadian Journal of Botany 1976. doi:10.1139/b76-178

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slight common root rot plants had a 26% grain yield loss compared with clean plants.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
slighte2
Outcome
losses in grain yielde3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
26%e3
Comparator
cleane2

Verbatim

e0

“common root rot (Cochliobolus sativus) on plant biomass and grain yield in naturally infected Triticum aestivum cultivar Manitou were studied at Matador, Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–181
e2

“Overall mean biomass losses at maturity in severe, moderate, and slight plants as compared with clean were 58%, 37%, and 25%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–991
e3

“losses in grain yield were 59%, 38%, and 26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1051

Title

The epidemiology of common root rot in Manitou wheat. IV. Appraisal of biomass and grain yield in naturally infected crops

P. R. Verma; R. A. A. Morrall; R. D. Tinline Canadian Journal of Botany 1976. doi:10.1139/b76-178

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater Cercospora infection severity increased nonsucrose chemical components in sugarbeet.

Treatment
increasing severity of C. beticola infectione0
Interactor
C. beticolaCercospora beticolae0pathogen
Outcome
nonsucrose chemical componentse0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing severity of C. beticola infection there was a general increase in nonsucrose chemical components, and decrease in gross sucrose yield, yield components, and purity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1046
e1

“sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–66

Title

Differential Response of Sugarbeet Cultivars to Cercospora Leaf Spot Disease1

G. A. Smith; S. S. Martin Crop Science 1978. doi:10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183x001800010011x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The observed increase in yield from selection was variable relative to the predicted increase.

Treatment
from selectione6
Outcome
observed increase in yielde6
Value
3.22 to 12.53%e6
Qualifier
0.00 to 19.25%e6
Comparator
that predictede6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74
e6

“The relationship between observed increase in yield from selection (3.22 to 12.53%) and that predicted (0.00 to 19.25%) was variable, but the observed decrease (‒1.93 to ‒17.25%) was generally greater than that predicted 0.00 to ‒17.65%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1314

Title

Observed and Predicted Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas1

Shivaji Pandey; E. T. Gritton Crop Science 1976. doi:10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183x001600020034x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one experiment, retaining leaves 6–20 increased root weight by 15%.

Treatment
removing all leaves except 6–20e0
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant and in one experiment increased it by 7% and root weight by 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–637
e1

“Sugar‐beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25

Title

The effect of partial defoliation on yield of sugar beet

S. A. W. FRENCH; E. C. HUMPHRIES Annals of Applied Biology 1977. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb01876.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide on a sparse alfalfa stand gave quackgrass yield of 990 kg/ha, below the control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
2.2 kg/ha pronamidee0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrass yieldse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
990e0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the sparse alfalfa stand with 2.2 kg/ha pronamide resulted in first cutting alfalfa and quackgrass yields of 2420 and 990 kg/ha compared to 1430 and 3940 kg/ha for controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1362

Title

Quackgrass(Agropyron repens)Control in Established Alfalfa(Medicago sativa)With Pronamide

R. S. Fawcett; R. G. Harvey; D. A. Schlough; et al. Weed Science 1978. doi:10.1017/s0043174500049663

Other claims from this paper (18)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.