View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphate of ammonia dressings did not decrease the yield of lucerne.
sulphate of ammonia e0 the yield of lucerne e1 without decreasing e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An experiment, carried out to determine the effect of dressings of sulphate of ammonia on an established lucerne-cocksfoot ley grown in narrow rows on heavy gault clay soil, is described and the results discussed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 e1 “The results suggest that it is possible to increase the yield s of grass and total produce without decreasing the yield of lucerne but that no marked increase in the yield of nitrogen per acre is to be expected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–524 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Animal traffic reduced alfalfa-brome-Ladino yield by 20% during the first grazing year on Ontonogan clay loam.
alfalfa‐brome‐Ladino e0 alfalfa‐brome‐Ladino yields e0 first pasturing year e0 Ontonogan clay loam e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “caused a 20% decrease in alfalfa‐brome‐Ladino yield s during the first pasturing year on Ontonogan clay loam. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–242 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Late stems produced grains that compensated for yield losses to differing degrees.
lately developed stems e0 producing grains in compensation the decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the lately developed stems were capable of producing grains in compensation the decrease and this compensation differs with the defferent field. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2203 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant tissue calcium content decrease d with decrease d yield .
plant tissues e0 decreased yields e0 Verbatim
e0 “Associated with decrease d yield s of the plants tested was an increase in the sodium content and a corresponding decrease in the calcium content of the plant tissues. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1381 t0 “Alfalfa and Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Similarly treated plants had the same leaf-area reduction across two years but a much greater net-assimilation decrease in the second year.
reduction of leaf area e0 but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second e0 Verbatim
e0 “similarly treated plants showed the same reduction of leaf area in two successive years, but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1193 e1 “Infection with beet yellows virus depressed the dry‐matter yield of sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Beet yellows infection depressed sugar-beet dry-matter yield by decreasing leaf area and net assimilation rate, without reducing leaf number. Intervention effect End-of-June yellows infection yellowed 30‐50% of leaf area from mid-August; later infection caused less yellowing. Mechanism Yellowing nearly explained the decrease in net assimilation if yellowed leaf parts do not photosynthesize, although similar carbohydrate fluctuations suggest photosynthesis may be little slowed and respiration may instead increase. Intervention effect Late-sown infected plants had a greater leaf-area reduction but a smaller net-assimilation reduction than early-sown plants. Intervention effect Yellows dry-matter losses were mostly in roots, petiole dry weight also decreased, and leaf-lamina dry weight was little affected. Intervention effect Yellows greatly increased reducing sugars and caused smaller sucrose and starch increases in leaf laminae, beginning with etch symptoms; starch effects peaked then while sugar effects increased with yellowing. Intervention effect Yellows reduced leaf-lamina water content, nitrogen content and arealweight ratio. Mechanism The carbohydrate rise could explain the nitrogen-content change but not the other leaf-lamina changes. Intervention effect Yellows did not affect petiole and root water content but increased their nitrogen content. Mechanism Yellows reduced root sucrose content, while decreased root weight accounted for most sugar-yield loss. Intervention effect Beet mosaic infection decreased sugar-beet dry weight only with nitrogenous fertilizer, through reduced leaf area and net assimilation. Intervention effect Mosaic depressed dry weights of leaf lamina, petiole and root. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect leaf-lamina carbohydrate content, water content or arealweight ratio. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect petiole and root water content. Intervention effect Mosaic increased nitrogen content throughout plants receiving no nitrogenous fertilizer, but not in nitrogen-treated plants. Intervention effect Mosaic slightly increased root sucrose content. Intervention effect End-of-June mosaic infection caused a 20 yo sugar-yield loss in nitrogen-fertilized plants. Intervention effect Yellows infection of similar plants at the same date reduced sugar yield by 50%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late transplanting decrease d rice yield , especially with dense nursery sowing.
late transplanting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the late transplanting of rice results in a remarkable decrease of yield s, particularly when the seeds are sown densely in the nursery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–182 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither insecticide changed end-of-season cotton yield for Acala 1517C.
neither variety showed a decrease nor increase e0 at the end of the season e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The Acala 1517C reacted in a somewhat different manner to the treatments but neither variety showed a decrease nor increase in yield of cotton at the end of the season. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–410 t0 “Effects of Systemic Insecticide Seed Treatments on Two Varieties of Cotton1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Ultraviolet pretreatment reduced X-ray induced chromosomal aberrations in wheat root meristems.
root meristems e0 seeds are pretreated with ultraviolet radiation e0 yield of chromosomal aberrations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in the yield of chromosomal aberrations in root meristems of wheat induced by four different doses of x-rays has been found to occur when the seeds are pretreated with ultraviolet radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–200 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Weight of grain per ear decrease d strikingly.
weight of grain per ear e0 Verbatim
e0 “striking decrease in weight of grain per ear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–797 t0 “WINTER WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–106 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf-stem ratio decrease d remarkably in August.
Remarkable decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Jerusalem artichoke ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 e0 “Remarkable decrease , however, was seen in leaf-stem ratio during this period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–400 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Medicago sativae0
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Helianthus tuberosus