View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
sulphur dioxide treatment e0 yield of alfalfa e0 no_change inferred e0 under none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Caterpillar borers attacking sugarcane canes during growth cause a decrease in sugar yield .
caterpillar borers e2 pest Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane is no more free from the attentions of insect-pests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 e2 “The shoots are liable to attack by, at least, three kinds of caterpillar borers, which kill them outright ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–391 e3 “These borers may also attack the joints of canes during their growth and cause a decrease in the yield of sugar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–504 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional inch of rain caused a greater average wheat yield decrease in 1854–77 than across 1854–1918.
manured solely in the autumn e0 Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden t0 Verbatim
e0 “In the years 1854–77, when plots were manured solely in the autumn, the average decrease in yield caused by each additional inch of rain is greater than the average decrease from 1854–1918 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–355 t0 “wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–120 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Minor leaf injuries did not significantly decrease yield .
Minor leaf injuries e0 did not result in significant decreases e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Minor leaf injuries which were designed to upset the elaboration and translocation of synthesized plant food did not result in significant decrease s in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1549 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease under leaf rust was due more to lower kernel weight than to fewer kernels per head
Thatcher and Renown wheat e0 The decrease in yield e4 reduction in kernel weight e4 Verbatim
e0 “A study was made at Winnipeg in 1938 to determine the effect of leaf rust on the yield and quality of Thatcher and Renown wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 e4 “The decrease in yield was due more to reduction in kernel weight than to reduction in number of kernels per head ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–731 e1 “In the 1/400-acre plots, leaf rust reduced the yield of Thatcher and Renown by 51.17 and 29.61%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–551 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen percentage of barley grain showed a progressive decrease not explained by rainfall, sowing date or yield .
barley grain t0 percentage of nitrogen e5 cannot be accounted for by changes in any of the above factors e5 Verbatim
t0 “the barley grain of Hoosfield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 e5 “there is a progressive decrease in the percentage of nitrogen which cannot be accounted for by changes in any of the above factors, and which may well be due to varietal improvement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–571 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease from sulphate of ammonia is ascribed to more lodging and a greater incidence of foot rot.
reduction in yield e2 more lodging and greater incidence of e4 Verbatim
e1 “study the effect of the time of application of sulphate of ammonia to autumn-sown wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–161 e2 “in those three cases sulphate of ammonia decrease d yield , irrespective of time of application; the reduction in yield was of the order of 10 per cent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–418 e4 “is ascribed to more lodging and greater incidence of ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–476 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe drought, leaf and stalk injury reduced yield less than in normal seasons.
leaf and stalk injuries e0 did not result in as great a decrease e0 normal seasons e0 Verbatim
e0 “Severe drouth in 1930 caused moisture to become the limiting factor so that leaf and stalk injuries did not result in as great a decrease in yield as in normal seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2619 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under some conditions sulphur dioxide significantly increased alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 under some of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under some of the conditions it brought about significant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–662 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 no significant effect e1 under most of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Medicago sativae0
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays subsp. mays.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare