Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sulphur dioxide treatmente0
Outcome
yield of alfalfae0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
under none of the conditions studiede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillar borers attacking sugarcane canes during growth cause a decrease in sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Organ / stage
jointse3
Interactor
caterpillar borerse2pest
Outcome
yield of sugare3
Direction
decreasee3

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane is no more free from the attentions of insect-pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61
e2

“The shoots are liable to attack by, at least, three kinds of caterpillar borers, which kill them outright”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–391
e3

“These borers may also attack the joints of canes during their growth and cause a decrease in the yield of sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–504

Title

SUGAR-CANE INSECTS IN SOUTH INDIA

Government Entomologist Coimbatore; RAO SAHIB RAMACHANDRA RAO Y Madras Agricultural Journal 1930. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a01480

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional inch of rain caused a greater average wheat yield decrease in 1854–77 than across 1854–1918.

Treatment
manured solely in the autumne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
1854–1918e0
Setting
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpendent0

Verbatim

e0

“In the years 1854–77, when plots were manured solely in the autumn, the average decrease in yield caused by each additional inch of rain is greater than the average decrease from 1854–1918”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–355
t0

“wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–120

Title

A comparison of the effect of rainfall on spring- and autumn-dressed wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden (With Five Text-figures.)

“Alumnus” The Journal of Agricultural Science 1932. doi:10.1017/s0021859600053120

Other claims from this paper (1)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.