View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame seed yield began to decrease at a plant water stress index of 0.31.
threshold plant water stress index value e0 Verbatim
e0 “the threshold plant water stress index value, where sesame seed yield starts to decrease , was calculated as 0.31 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1680 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
prediction accuracy for grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 whole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model accurately predicted reduced cucumber fruit yield under shading.
shading treatments e0 cucumber fruit yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The model also accurately predicted the decrease in cucumber fruit yield under low-sunlight conditions (shading treatments) and the increase in yield due to supplemental lighting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1428 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Isareg was judged appropriate for estimating grain yield decrease .
appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The Isareg model is appropriate to estimate the grain yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1028 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yield s as well as yield safety for the future. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
vegetables, and ornamentals e1 calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 polynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Selecting for minimal yield decrease under stress failed to identify the best genotypes in this context.
identify the best genotypes e0 favorable conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “a selection based on minimum yield decrease under stress with respect to favorable conditions failed to identify the best genotypes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1667 e1 “barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–159 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The optical sensor algorithm can decrease environmental contamination due to excess nitrogen fertilization.
environmental contamination e0 Verbatim
t0 “Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 e0 “Using our optical sensor‐based algorithm that employs yield prediction and N responsiveness by location (0.4 m2 resolution) can increase yield s and decrease environmental contamination due to excessive N fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–2008 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
EPIC projected a corn yield decrease under the coarse scenario.
coarse scenario e0 Not reported Outcome Value
Verbatim
e0 “EPIC simulated a decrease for the coarse scenario but no change for the fine scale scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–659 t0 “for wheat and corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The SDI models indicated a linear decline in relative yield with increasing wetness.
linear decrease e0 increasing wetness (SDI values) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The SDI models indicated a linear decrease in the relative yield with increasing wetness (SDI values) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–924 t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Y/M selection substantially decrease d grain moisture.
Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “had a large decrease in grain moisture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1454 e1 “The Y/M selection differential for yield was only 64% of that of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1410 t0 “Selection Criteria for Grain Yield and Moisture in Maize Yield Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Goodness of fit of relative yield decrease with mean CWSI was r 2 = 0.78 for the combined plantings.
relative Y decrease with mean CWSI e5 Verbatim
t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 e5 “for relative Y decrease with mean CWSI, r 2 = 0.78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1467 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
NaN03-soluble soil nickel better predicted lettuce yield decrease than total or CaCl2-soluble soil nickel.
NaN03‐soluble soil Ni e0 decrease in yield e0 irrespective of soil type e0 total soil Ni (Added+ Native) and CaCl2 soluble soil Ni e0 Verbatim
e0 “NaN03‐soluble soil Ni, irrespective of soil type, is better suited to predict the decrease in yield and increase in Ni‐concentration of lettuce leaves as compared to total soil Ni (Added+ Native) and CaCl2 soluble soil Ni. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–711 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The variability response index quantitatively expressed yield decline from soil potassium variability.
Decrease in yield due to spatial variability of soil K e0 relatively uniform distribution of soil K e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in yield due to spatial variability of soil K was quantitatively expressed by the variability response index (VRI), i.e., the product of the variance of soil K and the second derivative of yield with respect to exchangeable K obtained under a relatively uniform distribution of soil K ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–802 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Contributions of the flag leaf and fourth leaf estimated from the grain- yield decrease under shading agreed closely with 14CO2 estimates.
percentage contributions to the grain e0 agreed closely e0 estimates obtained by using 14CO2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The percentage contributions to the grain by the flag leaf and fourth leaf, estimated from the decrease in grain yield when they were shaded, agreed closely with the estimates obtained by using 14CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1000 t0 “Sorghum vulgare
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A seedling infection index permitted estimates of subsequent yield decrease .
1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Symptoms of seedling infection incorporated into an index of infection permit estimates to be made o eventual decrease s in yield by applying the formula DY = 1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–859 t0 “varieties of wheat, oats and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar yield changes under competition were generally similar in blends and paired rows.
percentage yield increase or decrease e0 blend and the paired‐rows e0 Verbatim
e0 “The percentage yield increase or decrease of each cultivar in competition generally was similar in the blend and the paired‐rows ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1241 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The point when the percentage increase peaked and then slowed marked when fruit-bearing percentage was destined.
period in which fruit bearing percentage is destined e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “the period when the rate of increase in the percentage above mentioned reaches a maximum and thereafter the rate begins to decrease remarkably has been proved to be the period in which fruit bearing percentage is destined ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2561 t0 “Lowland Rice (Preliminary report) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–78 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Sesamum indicume0
Cicer arietinum
Cucumis sativus
Zea mays
Solanum tuberosum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Zea mays subsp. mays
Triticum aestivum
Lactuca sativa
Sorghum bicolor
Avena sativa
Oryza sativa