View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario A1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The biomass yield rate decrease was smaller in S1 than ATP.
decrease in biomass yield rate e0 relatively less e0 Verbatim
e0 “Per cent of decrease in biomass yield rate and CMS was relatively less in S1 than in ATP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–509 t0 “mulberry (Morus alba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–61 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reflective film did not alleviate the yield decrease associated with water deficit.
reflective film e0 did not alleviate the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The reflective film did not alleviate the decrease in yield or titratable acidity associated with water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1058 t0 “Merlot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% under scenario B1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
N and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.
no corresponding decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield s of maize, cotton and soybean decrease d sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360 t0 “mimosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at Kanafar correlated with higher growing-season temperature (by 0.6 degrees C).
Cabernet Sauvignon t0 higher temperature during the growing season e1 decrease in yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29 e1 “the decrease in yield at Kanafar correlated with higher temperature during the growing season (by 0.6 °C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1355 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield and economic benefit would decrease .
yield and economic benefit e0 Verbatim
t0 “litchi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 e0 “the yield and economic benefit decreasing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–753 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Vitis
Candidatus Phytoplasma
Citrus sinensis
Mimosa
Litchi