View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Field sowing in the seedling nursery reduced rootstock yield and quality.
Treatmentsowing in the field in the seedling nursery e0 Outcomeyield and quality indicators of rootstocks e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There is a decrease in the yield and quality indicators of rootstocks when sowing in the field in the seedling nursery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–988 t0 “common quince of VNIISPK breeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–159 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in relative fruit growth rate during the warm, dry week was inversely proportionate to irrigation level.
Treatmentirrigation level e4 Outcomerelative fruit growth rate e4 Directioninversely proportionate e4 Verbatim
t0 “Japanese plum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–150 e4 “The decrease in relative fruit growth rate during this week was inversely proportionate to the irrigation level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1354 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sun storage significantly reduced leaf oil yield from 0.38% to 0.11% over four weeks.
Verbatim
e0 “for the leave kept under sun there was significant decrease in the oil yield from 0.38% in the 1st week to 0.11% in the 4th week. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–399 t0 “Eucalyptus Citriodora Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The highest crop load in Auksis grafted on M.9 and P 22 rootstocks caused the most significant decrease in return bloom.
Treatmenthighest crop load e7 Qualifiergrafted on M.9 and P 22 rootstocks e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yield of apple tree buds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–658 e7 “The most significant decrease in return bloom resulted from the highest crop load in "Auksis" grafted on M.9 and P 22 rootstocks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1951 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation decrease d yield per shoot by 30%.
Treatmentpre-flowering leaf removal t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a notable decrease in fruit-set (-7.6 %), cluster mass (-34%) and yield per shoot (-30%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1069 t0 “pre-flowering leaf removal on berry growth components and grape composition in cv. Barbera vines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–133 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-treated Jatropha curcas had a lower absolute PSI quantum yield than well-watered controls.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomeabsolute quantum yield of PSI e0 Comparatorwell-watered control e0 Verbatim
e0 “in drought-treated plants, we observed a decrease in the absolute quantum yield of PSI as compared with the well-watered control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–934 t0 “Jatropha curcas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–132 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvesting rate increased by 40.8 kg/h with an approximate 2 m decrease in tree height.
Outcomeharvesting rate per picker e0 Qualifier2 m decrease in tree height e0 Verbatim
e0 “harvesting rate per picker increased 40.8 kg/h (equivalent to one field box of Florida oranges per hour) for an approximate increase of either 20 t/ha in yield or 50 g in fruit weight, or a 2 m decrease in tree height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–618 t0 “Orange Grove ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Four weeks of drought significantly reduced light-adapted photosystem II quantum yield .
Treatmentdrought treatment e0 Outcomephotosystem II quantum yield of light-adapted needles (phi(a)) e0 Comparatorwell-watered controls e0 Verbatim
t0 “Norway spruce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 e0 “Four weeks of drought treatment caused a small but significant decrease in photosystem II quantum yield of light-adapted needles (phi(a)) compared with that of well-watered controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–344 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic management lowered D. largueta almond yield by 9.5% relative to conventional management.
Treatmentorganic production system e1 Comparatorconventional system e0 Verbatim
e0 “a slight decrease in almond yield , specifically 9.5% for cv. D. largueta and 1.3% for cv. Marcona, with respect to the conventional system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–870 e1 “the organic production system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–646 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
After 1989 grape yield declined slightly by 0.28 kg·ar-1.
Verbatim
e0 “after this time a very slight decrease of 0.28 kg·ar-1 was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1490 e1 “linear trend for grape yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1313 t0 “'White Riesling' ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–40 Other claims from this paper (18) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.