View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% ET c, yield did not decrease economically.
TaxonCabernet Sauvignon Grapevine t0 Directionwithout an economic decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without an economic decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1253 t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–151 e1 “with 50% ET c ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1281 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bale storage did not decrease Cistus oil yield .
Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The storage of mechanically harvested Cistus ladanifer does not decrease the oil yield of steam distillation on a pilot scale. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1029 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
ARD caused greater yield decrease at low temperature.
Directiongreater decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The occurrence of ARD caused a greater decrease in the yield of trees due to low temperature. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1348 e1 “replanted apple trees of the `Najdared` cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–380 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit did not decrease maximum quantum yield of PSII.
Outcomemaximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD did not decrease the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1081 t0 “Styrax camporum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nut yield tended to decrease above 220 kg·ha -1 K per year.
Treatmentannual rate exceeded 220 kg·ha -1 K e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nut yield tended to decrease when the annual rate exceeded 220 kg·ha -1 K ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–778 t0 “Pistachio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Trees treated at 40 t/ha were expected to show yield decrease after reduced frost resistance.
Verbatim
t0 “shoots of apple tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–143 e7 “Such plants are subsequently subject to decrease in frost resistance, and as a result – to yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1173 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Under scenario B1 mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% in future periods.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DI and PRD did not significantly decrease yield .
Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “these treatments did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1556 t0 “lemon Fino 49 trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 e1 “DI and PRD decrease d stomatal conductance and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1501 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield .
Treatmenttraining to an espalier shape e0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Qualifierwith and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield .
Directiondid not decrease e3 Comparatorfull irrigation e6 Verbatim
e3 “The RDI strategy did not decrease the fruit yield despite the fact that olive weight tended to decrease , and it increased the oil yield by ~14.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1078 e6 “full irrigation (FI, 100% of ETc) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–447 e0 “olive trees cv Arbosana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.