Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease from water deficit applied post-veraison was not obvious compared with the contrast treatment of Himrod table grape.
Verbatim
e0“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”
e5“The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment”
Title
LI Ya-sha Zhongguo nongye Kexue 2014
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Water deficit reduced the number of axillary shoots, leaf area and stem diameter of Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Water deficit reduced internode length and weight of summer pruning of Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased berry length, berry width and berry weight of Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Water deficit decreased cluster length and cluster weight of Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Water deficit increased reducing sugar, soluble solids and Vc of berry in Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Alternate partial root-zone irrigation significantly enhanced the internal quality scores of Himrod berries compared with the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect Water deficit after veraison significantly enhanced the internal quality scores of Himrod berries compared with the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect Water deficit during pre-veraison made the internal quality scores of Himrod berries lower than the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect Water deficit lowered the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of Himrod leaves compared with the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect Water deficit increased intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiency of Himrod leaves compared with the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point and dark respiratory rate of Himrod were higher than in the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect In water deficit treatments, the maximum net photosynthetic rate of Himrod was lower than in the contrast treatment.
- Association Leaf water potential was higher in the contrast treatment than in the other treatments of Himrod table grape.
- Intervention effect Alternate partial root-zone irrigation significantly reduced yield of Himrod table grape compared with the contrast treatment.
- Intervention effect Water deficit during pre-veraison significantly reduced yield of Himrod table grape compared with the contrast treatment.
- Recommendation Water deficit could be used as a strategy to regulate the vegetative and reproductive growth of table grape, improving fruit quality and water use efficiency.
- Recommendation Water deficit applied during post-veraison is recommended as a better strategy than the other irrigation methods for Himrod table grape.