Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linoleic acid in oil from infested fruit increased about 13%.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment: olive scale attacke0
Interactor: olive scalee0pest
Outcome: linoleice0
Direction: increasee0
Value: about 13 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fatty acid profile was slightly affected by olive scale attack: an increase of linoleic (about 13 %) and palmitoleic acid (about 8 %), but a decrease of oleic (about 3 %) and stearic acid (about 4 %) in oils obtained from infested fruits was detected.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1368

t0
“olive oil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–118

Title

Effects of olive scale (Parlatoria oleae (Colvée)) attack on yield, quality and fatty acid profile of virgin olive oil

Karolina Brkić Bubola; Marin Krapac; Barbara Sladonja DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Olive scale attack did not induce fruit ripening or stimulate oil synthesis.
Intervention effect Oil from infested and healthy olive fruits had similar acidity.
Intervention effect Olive scale attack caused slight oxidative deterioration of oil.
Intervention effect Olive scale attack had no effect on sensory characteristics of olive oil.
Intervention effect Palmitoleic acid in oil from infested fruit increased about 8%.
Intervention effect Oleic acid in oil from infested fruit decreased about 3%.
Intervention effect Stearic acid in oil from infested fruit decreased about 4%.
Intervention effect Oil from infested fruits had a lower oleic to linoleic ratio.

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Coefficient A increased abruptly to a maximum with biological time in Populus deltoides.

Taxon: Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidest0
Organ / stage: growth stagee0
Outcome: coefficient Ae0
Direction: increased abruptlye0

Verbatim

e0
“With increasing τ, the coefficient A, the reciprocal of which means the asymptote of yield (=wρ) at a given growth stage, increased abruptly to a maximum value and then tended to decrease gradually to a constant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1142

t0
“Populus deltoides”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88

Title

Growth analysis of the competition–density effect in non-self-thinning Populus deltoides and Populus × euramericana plantations

Li Xue; Akio Hagihara Journal of Forest Research 2008. doi:10.1007/s10310-008-0070-z

Other claims from this paper (16)

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Coefficient A increased abruptly to a maximum with biological time in Populus × euramericana.

Taxon: Populus × euramericanaPopulus ×canadensist0
Organ / stage: growth stagee0
Outcome: coefficient Ae0
Direction: increased abruptlye0

Verbatim

e0
“With increasing τ, the coefficient A, the reciprocal of which means the asymptote of yield (=wρ) at a given growth stage, increased abruptly to a maximum value and then tended to decrease gradually to a constant level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1142

t0
“Populus × euramericana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–115

Title

Growth analysis of the competition–density effect in non-self-thinning Populus deltoides and Populus × euramericana plantations

Li Xue; Akio Hagihara Journal of Forest Research 2008. doi:10.1007/s10310-008-0070-z

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf gas exchanges of the pear selection were low during the entire season.

Taxon: blush peart0
Outcome: gas exchanges of leavese1
Qualifier: low during the entire seasone1

Verbatim

t0
“blush pear selection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75

e1
“The gas exchanges of leaves were low during the entire season. There were no differences among treatments during most of the season, with deficit showing a decrease only during the warmest part of the season in late January and February”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–508

Title

Gas exchanges, fruit growth and yield of ‘ANP-0534’, a blush pear selection, under different irrigation levels

L. Corelli Grappadelli; P. Losciale; J. Lopresti; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2021. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2021.1303.46

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No differences in leaf gas exchanges among irrigation regimes during most of the season.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation decreased leaf gas exchanges only during the warmest part of the season in late January and February.
Observation Fruit development followed an expolinear pattern in mass.
Observation Absolute growth rates were low at the end of cell division.
Observation AGR values improved after irrigation started, reaching about 2 g per day from late December to late January.
Intervention effect Excess water gave higher AGR values than the other treatments in February.
Intervention effect Fruits under excess water were larger, by about 15% by weight.
Intervention effect Excess water required 50% more water applied than the other treatments.
Intervention effect The number of fruit per tree was higher in the standard irrigation treatment than in the excess irrigation treatment.
Intervention effect Fruit were still larger on the excess irrigation treatment after adjusting fruit size for fruit number per tree.
Intervention effect Yield did not differ among irrigation regimes.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped cocoa yielded 28-60% more beans than sole cocoa, except cocoa with cassava.

Taxon: cocoaTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment: intercropse0
Outcome: cocoa beanse0
Direction: moree0
Value: 28-60%e0
Qualifier: except in the case of the cocoa/cassava combinatione0
Comparator: sole crop cocoae0

Verbatim

e0
“cocoa beans from the intercrops was 28-60% more than the sole crop cocoa except in the case of the cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1589

Title

Long Term Assessment Of The Agronomic And Economic Benefits Of Cocoa Food Crop Intercropping In The Absence Of Fertilizer Application

Opoku-Ameyaw, K.; Oppong, F. K.; Acheampong, K.; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2012. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8168

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cocoa with plantain reduced seedling girth in year two.
Intervention effect Treatments did not significantly affect cocoa height.
Observation The four crop intercrop had the lowest soil N, P and K, without significance.
Intervention effect Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease.
Observation Intercropping was profitable.
Association Plantain and maize combinations produced higher net benefits.
Recommendation The authors recommend intercropping during establishment.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black 63% shade nets raised canopy humidity above green and white nets.

Taxon: Mandarint0
Treatment: Black shade netse0
Outcome: humiditye0
Direction: elevatione0
Qualifier: 63%e0
Comparator: green and white shade netse0

Verbatim

e0
“Black shade nets, particularly those with a shading level of 63%, demonstrated the most notable decrease in canopy temperature and an elevation in humidity, surpassing the performance of green and white shade nets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1058

t0
“‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54

Title

Improving Yield and Quality of ‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees by Using Shading Techniques and Reflective Materials in Response to Climate Change Under Flood Irrigation Conditions

Hesham M. A. El-Zawily; Mohammed M. S. Abo El-Enin; Hayam M. Elmenofy; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14112456

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Shade nets reduced orchard temperature relative to open field.
Intervention effect Shade nets enhanced humidity relative to open field.
Intervention effect Black 63% shade nets produced the greatest decrease in canopy temperature.
Intervention effect Shade treatments eliminated fruit sunburn, versus 8.74% without shade.
Intervention effect Kaolin foliar spray at 4% reduced sunburn incidence to 3.64%.
Intervention effect Calcium carbonate at 3% reduced sunburn incidence to 7.32%.
Intervention effect Shade and reflective treatments reduced sunburn intensity.
Intervention effect All treatments increased fruit yield relative to control.
Intervention effect White 50% shade produced the highest fruit yield increases of 43.70% and 40.17% across seasons.
Intervention effect White 50% shade produced yield efficiency of 5.24 and 5.47 kg/m2 across seasons.
Intervention effect White and green and black shade nets tended to improve physical and chemical fruit properties.
Recommendation The authors recommend white 50% or green 50% and 63% shade nets in summer for Balady mandarin trees.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmitoleic acid in oil from infested fruit increased about 8%.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment: olive scale attacke0
Interactor: olive scalee0pest
Outcome: palmitoleic acide0
Direction: increasee0
Value: about 8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fatty acid profile was slightly affected by olive scale attack: an increase of linoleic (about 13 %) and palmitoleic acid (about 8 %), but a decrease of oleic (about 3 %) and stearic acid (about 4 %) in oils obtained from infested fruits was detected.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1368

t0
“olive oil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–118

Title

Effects of olive scale (Parlatoria oleae (Colvée)) attack on yield, quality and fatty acid profile of virgin olive oil

Karolina Brkić Bubola; Marin Krapac; Barbara Sladonja DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Olive scale attack did not induce fruit ripening or stimulate oil synthesis.
Intervention effect Oil from infested and healthy olive fruits had similar acidity.
Intervention effect Olive scale attack caused slight oxidative deterioration of oil.
Intervention effect Olive scale attack had no effect on sensory characteristics of olive oil.
Intervention effect Linoleic acid in oil from infested fruit increased about 13%.
Intervention effect Oleic acid in oil from infested fruit decreased about 3%.
Intervention effect Stearic acid in oil from infested fruit decreased about 4%.
Intervention effect Oil from infested fruits had a lower oleic to linoleic ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 61.24–92.59%.

Taxon: Ziziphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: fipronile1
Interactor: Eublemma amabilisEublemma amabilise1pest
Outcome: suppression of Eublemma amabilis populatione1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 61.24–92.59e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of broodlac from kusmi winter crop raised on Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–212

e1
“Application of fipronil, spinosad and flubendiamide resulted in 61.24–92.59, 87.08–92.59 and 70.93–96.30% suppression of Eublemma amabilis population, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523

Title

Impact of certain insecticides on pest suppression and productivity of Kusmi Lac from Ziziphus mauritiana

A. K. Jaiswal; J. P. Singh; A. K. Sinha Indian Journal of Entomology 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00294.8

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 87.08–92.59%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 70.93–96.30%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave 100% pest suppression even with a single spray.
Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 89.29–96.30%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 96.43–100%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 74.99–100%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave complete suppression of Pseudohypatopa pulverea.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb increased broodlac yield over control, by 59.5375.11%.
Intervention effect Fipronil increased broodlac yield over control, by 85.21–17.9.
Intervention effect Spinosad increased broodlac yield over control, by 63.81–120.07.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide increased broodlac yield over control, by 4.09–83.97%.
Intervention effect One spray of fipronil and spinosad significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Two sprays of indoxacarb significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Three sprays of flubendiamide significantly increased yield.
Recommendation One spray of spinosad, two sprays of indoxacarb and fipronil, and three sprays of flubendiamide is the best regime for pest incidence and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 87.08–92.59%.

Taxon: Ziziphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: spinosade1
Interactor: Eublemma amabilisEublemma amabilise1pest
Outcome: suppression of Eublemma amabilis populatione1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 87.08–92.59e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of broodlac from kusmi winter crop raised on Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–212

e1
“Application of fipronil, spinosad and flubendiamide resulted in 61.24–92.59, 87.08–92.59 and 70.93–96.30% suppression of Eublemma amabilis population, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523

Title

Impact of certain insecticides on pest suppression and productivity of Kusmi Lac from Ziziphus mauritiana

A. K. Jaiswal; J. P. Singh; A. K. Sinha Indian Journal of Entomology 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00294.8

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 61.24–92.59%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 70.93–96.30%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave 100% pest suppression even with a single spray.
Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 89.29–96.30%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 96.43–100%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 74.99–100%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave complete suppression of Pseudohypatopa pulverea.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb increased broodlac yield over control, by 59.5375.11%.
Intervention effect Fipronil increased broodlac yield over control, by 85.21–17.9.
Intervention effect Spinosad increased broodlac yield over control, by 63.81–120.07.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide increased broodlac yield over control, by 4.09–83.97%.
Intervention effect One spray of fipronil and spinosad significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Two sprays of indoxacarb significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Three sprays of flubendiamide significantly increased yield.
Recommendation One spray of spinosad, two sprays of indoxacarb and fipronil, and three sprays of flubendiamide is the best regime for pest incidence and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 70.93–96.30%.

Taxon: Ziziphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: flubendiamidee1
Interactor: Eublemma amabilisEublemma amabilise1pest
Outcome: suppression of Eublemma amabilis populatione1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 70.93–96.30e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of broodlac from kusmi winter crop raised on Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–212

e1
“Application of fipronil, spinosad and flubendiamide resulted in 61.24–92.59, 87.08–92.59 and 70.93–96.30% suppression of Eublemma amabilis population, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–523

Title

Impact of certain insecticides on pest suppression and productivity of Kusmi Lac from Ziziphus mauritiana

A. K. Jaiswal; J. P. Singh; A. K. Sinha Indian Journal of Entomology 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00294.8

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 61.24–92.59%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 87.08–92.59%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave 100% pest suppression even with a single spray.
Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 89.29–96.30%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 96.43–100%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 74.99–100%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave complete suppression of Pseudohypatopa pulverea.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb increased broodlac yield over control, by 59.5375.11%.
Intervention effect Fipronil increased broodlac yield over control, by 85.21–17.9.
Intervention effect Spinosad increased broodlac yield over control, by 63.81–120.07.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide increased broodlac yield over control, by 4.09–83.97%.
Intervention effect One spray of fipronil and spinosad significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Two sprays of indoxacarb significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Three sprays of flubendiamide significantly increased yield.
Recommendation One spray of spinosad, two sprays of indoxacarb and fipronil, and three sprays of flubendiamide is the best regime for pest incidence and yield.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics