Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

1,314 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 273 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 3 earlier · 1910s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting rate increased by 40.8 kg/h with an approximate 50 g fruit weight increase.

Taxon: Oranget0
Outcome: harvesting rate per pickere0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 40.8 kg/he0
Qualifier: 50 ge0
Setting: Floridae0

Verbatim

e0
“harvesting rate per picker increased 40.8 kg/h (equivalent to one field box of Florida oranges per hour) for an approximate increase of either 20 t/ha in yield or 50 g in fruit weight, or a 2 m decrease in tree height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–618

t0
“Orange Grove”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12

Title

Orange Grove Factors Affect Manual Harvesting Rates

J. D. Whitney; T. A. Wheaton; W. S. Castle; et al. Transactions of the ASAE 1996. doi:10.13031/2013.27515

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ACC from low to medium rate increased fruit size, then leveled off.

Taxon: Japanese PlumsPrunus salicinat0
Treatment: ACC ratee0
Outcome: fruit sizee0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: low to medium ratee0

Verbatim

t0
“Japanese Plums (Prunus salacina)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–157

e0
“In the second season there was a linear decrease in yield and an increase in fruit size as the ACC rate increased from the low to medium rate before flattening off.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–978

Title

Efficacy of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) as a Chemical Thinner Alone or Combined with Mechanical Thinning for Japanese Plums (Prunus salacina)

Karen Inge Theron; Human Steenkamp; Willem Jacobus Steyn HortScience 2017. doi:10.21273/hortsci11445-16

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect ACC significantly thinned fruit across all trials.
Intervention effect ACC reduced commercial hand-thinning need in African Rose across both seasons.
Intervention effect Increasing ACC from low to medium rate linearly decreased yield, then leveled off.
Intervention effect ACC plus Darwin 300 thinned African Rose more aggressively.
Intervention effect ACC plus Darwin 300 improved African Rose fruit size.
Intervention effect ACC plus Darwin 300 shifted African Rose harvest earlier.
Intervention effect Yield under ACC plus Darwin 300 was not lower than control.
Intervention effect 6-BA generally did not thin fruitlets.
Intervention effect 6-BA combined with ACC gave stronger thinning in Laetitia.
Observation Cultivars differed in ACC sensitivity.
Recommendation Authors recommended 600 µL·L −1 ACC for African Rose.
Recommendation Authors recommended 400 µL·L −1 ACC for Laetitia.
Recommendation Further trials were recommended before setting a Fortune ACC rate.
Observation No fruit had broken stones in any trial.
Intervention effect No leaf drop or phytotoxicity was recorded when ACC was applied in cool, slow-drying conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruits per panicle to 6.43.

Taxon: Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Treatment: GA3 at 25 ppme0
Outcome: number of fruits per paniclee0
Direction: increaseinferrede0
Value: 6.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010

t0
“Mango cv. Amrapali”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130

Title

Effect of pre-harvest application of GA3, Naphthalene acetic acid and borax on fruit drop, yield and quality of Mango cv. Amrapali

PK Maurya; VK Tripathi; Shubham Gupta Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020. doi:10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i6ae.13275

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect GA3 at 25 ppm significantly decreased fruit drop to 85.77%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruit retention to 14.23%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm significantly increased fruit yield to 50.67 kg/tree.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased polar fruit diameter to 9.11 cm.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased equatorial diameter to 7.39 cm.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp proportion to 74.56%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp to stone ratio to 7.12.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm decreased peel proportion to 14.94%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm decreased stone proportion to 10.51%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit weight to 244.59 g.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit volume to 255.43 cc.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased specific gravity to 1.09 g/cc.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased total soluble solids to 18.36 0Brix.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased total sugars to 17.75%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased ascorbic acid to 37.60 mg/100g.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm reduced titratable acidity to 0.50%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. deserticola inoculation increased soil availability of N, P, and K relative to other treatments.

Taxon: Kinnow mandarint0
Treatment: inoculated with G. deserticolae0
Interactor: G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome: soil availability of N, P, and Ke0
Direction: increasee0
Comparator: all other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0
“A decrease in soil EC and organic carbon, and an increase in soil availability of N, P, and K, leaf nutrient status, and fruit yield and quality were observed when the plants were inoculated with G. deserticola compared with all other treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1158

t0
“Kinnow mandarin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–158

Title

Rhizosphere dynamics influenced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus deserticola) and related changes in leaf nutrient status and yield of Kinnow mandarin {King (Citrus nobilis) × Willow Leaf (Citrus deliciosa)}

K. Usha; A. Saxena; B. Singh Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 2004. doi:10.1071/ar03036

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect AMF inoculation increased release of four organic acids from Kinnow roots.
Intervention effect G. deserticola with FYM reduced soil pH from 8.5 to 6.4.
Intervention effect G. deserticola inoculation decreased soil EC and organic carbon relative to other treatments.
Intervention effect G. deserticola inoculation increased leaf nutrient status relative to other treatments.
Intervention effect G. deserticola inoculation increased fruit yield and quality relative to other treatments.
Intervention effect The authors infer that G. deserticola improves rhizosphere conditions and Kinnow growth, yield, and quality compared with A. chroococcum.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted rust infection of the first-listed orchard progeny is 49%, against 50% for unimproved material.

Taxon: slash pinePinus elliottiit0
Treatment: orchard progenye5
Interactor: fusiform ruste6pathogen
Outcome: Rustinfectione5
Direction: decreaseinferrede5
Value: 49%e5
Qualifier: on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infectione5
Comparator: unimproved materiale5

Verbatim

t0
“Slash Pine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57

e5
“Rustinfection of orchard progeny on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infection are predicted to be 49%, 41%, and 35% for the three orchard types”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–442

e6
“a growth and yield model that incorporates fusiform rust”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–506

Title

Predicted Genetic Gains from one Generation of Slash Pine Tree Improvement

G. R. Hodge; T. L. White; G. L. Powell; et al. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1989. doi:10.1093/sjaf/13.1.51

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect First-generation un-rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 10% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect First-generation rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 15% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect One and one-half generation orchard progeny are predicted to gain 19% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the second-listed orchard progeny is 41%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the third-listed orchard progeny is 35%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 7.0% for the first-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 13.2% for the second-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 18.0% for the third-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Collecting and deploying the most rust-resistant seed to high rust hazard sites raises the gain on those sites, increasingly so as hazard rises.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted rust infection of the second-listed orchard progeny is 41%, against 50% for unimproved material.

Taxon: slash pinePinus elliottiit0
Treatment: orchard progenye5
Interactor: fusiform ruste6pathogen
Outcome: Rustinfectione5
Direction: decreaseinferrede5
Value: 41%e5
Qualifier: on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infectione5
Comparator: unimproved materiale5

Verbatim

t0
“Slash Pine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57

e5
“Rustinfection of orchard progeny on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infection are predicted to be 49%, 41%, and 35% for the three orchard types”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–442

e6
“a growth and yield model that incorporates fusiform rust”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–506

Title

Predicted Genetic Gains from one Generation of Slash Pine Tree Improvement

G. R. Hodge; T. L. White; G. L. Powell; et al. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1989. doi:10.1093/sjaf/13.1.51

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect First-generation un-rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 10% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect First-generation rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 15% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect One and one-half generation orchard progeny are predicted to gain 19% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the first-listed orchard progeny is 49%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the third-listed orchard progeny is 35%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 7.0% for the first-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 13.2% for the second-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 18.0% for the third-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Collecting and deploying the most rust-resistant seed to high rust hazard sites raises the gain on those sites, increasingly so as hazard rises.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted rust infection of the third-listed orchard progeny is 35%, against 50% for unimproved material.

Taxon: slash pinePinus elliottiit0
Treatment: orchard progenye5
Interactor: fusiform ruste6pathogen
Outcome: Rustinfectione5
Direction: decreaseinferrede5
Value: 35%e5
Qualifier: on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infectione5
Comparator: unimproved materiale5

Verbatim

t0
“Slash Pine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57

e5
“Rustinfection of orchard progeny on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infection are predicted to be 49%, 41%, and 35% for the three orchard types”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–442

e6
“a growth and yield model that incorporates fusiform rust”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–506

Title

Predicted Genetic Gains from one Generation of Slash Pine Tree Improvement

G. R. Hodge; T. L. White; G. L. Powell; et al. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1989. doi:10.1093/sjaf/13.1.51

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect First-generation un-rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 10% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect First-generation rogued orchard progeny are predicted to gain 15% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect One and one-half generation orchard progeny are predicted to gain 19% in individual tree volume at 15 years over unimproved seed.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the first-listed orchard progeny is 49%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Predicted rust infection of the second-listed orchard progeny is 41%, against 50% for unimproved material.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 7.0% for the first-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 13.2% for the second-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Percent volume per acre gain is predicted to be 18.0% for the third-listed orchard type.
Intervention effect Collecting and deploying the most rust-resistant seed to high rust hazard sites raises the gain on those sites, increasingly so as hazard rises.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 96.43–100%.

Taxon: Ziziphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: spinosade3
Interactor: Pseudohypatopa pulvereae3pest
Outcome: suppression in population of Pseudohypatopa pulvereae3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3
Value: 96.43–100e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of broodlac from kusmi winter crop raised on Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–212

e3
“Similarly, 89.29–96.30, 96.43–100 and 74.99–100% suppression in population of Pseudohypatopa pulverea was recorded with fipronil, spinosad and flubendiamide, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–783

Title

Impact of certain insecticides on pest suppression and productivity of Kusmi Lac from Ziziphus mauritiana

A. K. Jaiswal; J. P. Singh; A. K. Sinha Indian Journal of Entomology 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00294.8

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 61.24–92.59%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 87.08–92.59%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 70.93–96.30%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave 100% pest suppression even with a single spray.
Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 89.29–96.30%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 74.99–100%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave complete suppression of Pseudohypatopa pulverea.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb increased broodlac yield over control, by 59.5375.11%.
Intervention effect Fipronil increased broodlac yield over control, by 85.21–17.9.
Intervention effect Spinosad increased broodlac yield over control, by 63.81–120.07.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide increased broodlac yield over control, by 4.09–83.97%.
Intervention effect One spray of fipronil and spinosad significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Two sprays of indoxacarb significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Three sprays of flubendiamide significantly increased yield.
Recommendation One spray of spinosad, two sprays of indoxacarb and fipronil, and three sprays of flubendiamide is the best regime for pest incidence and yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 74.99–100%.

Taxon: Ziziphus mauritianaZiziphus mauritianae0
Treatment: flubendiamidee3
Interactor: Pseudohypatopa pulvereae3pest
Outcome: suppression in population of Pseudohypatopa pulvereae3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3
Value: 74.99–100e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“yield of broodlac from kusmi winter crop raised on Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–212

e3
“Similarly, 89.29–96.30, 96.43–100 and 74.99–100% suppression in population of Pseudohypatopa pulverea was recorded with fipronil, spinosad and flubendiamide, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–783

Title

Impact of certain insecticides on pest suppression and productivity of Kusmi Lac from Ziziphus mauritiana

A. K. Jaiswal; J. P. Singh; A. K. Sinha Indian Journal of Entomology 2018. doi:10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00294.8

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 61.24–92.59%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 87.08–92.59%.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide suppressed the Eublemma amabilis population by 70.93–96.30%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave 100% pest suppression even with a single spray.
Intervention effect Fipronil suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 89.29–96.30%.
Intervention effect Spinosad suppressed the Pseudohypatopa pulverea population by 96.43–100%.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb gave complete suppression of Pseudohypatopa pulverea.
Intervention effect Indoxacarb increased broodlac yield over control, by 59.5375.11%.
Intervention effect Fipronil increased broodlac yield over control, by 85.21–17.9.
Intervention effect Spinosad increased broodlac yield over control, by 63.81–120.07.
Intervention effect Flubendiamide increased broodlac yield over control, by 4.09–83.97%.
Intervention effect One spray of fipronil and spinosad significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Two sprays of indoxacarb significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Three sprays of flubendiamide significantly increased yield.
Recommendation One spray of spinosad, two sprays of indoxacarb and fipronil, and three sprays of flubendiamide is the best regime for pest incidence and yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Pearson correlation between disease index and comprehensive fruit quality score was significantly negative.

Taxon: kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae0
Interactor: Corynespora cassiicolaCorynespora cassiicolae0pathogen
Outcome: comprehensive score of fruit qualitye4
Direction: decreaseinferrede4
Value: −0.762e4
Comparator: disease indexe4

Verbatim

e0
“Kiwifruit brown spot, caused by the fungus Corynespora cassiicola, has recently emerged as a problematic foliar disease of kiwifruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–132

e4
“The Pearson correlation coefficient between disease index and comprehensive score of fruit quality was −0.762 (p < 0.01), indicating a significant relationship”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1153

Title

Different Disease Levels Reveal Kiwifruit Brown Spot Impacts on Fruit Yield and Quality

Yuhang Zhu; Jing Xu; Jun Wang; et al. Journal of Fungi 2025. doi:10.3390/jof11080593

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics