Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

1,314 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 273 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 3 earlier · 1910s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding N to areca specific fertilizer increased leaf N.

Taxon: arecaArecae0
Treatment: Adding some N fertilizer into areca specific fertilizere0
Outcome: content of N in the leavese0
Direction: improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Adding some N fertilizer into areca specific fertilizer could improve the content of N in the leaves,decrease the content of K”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–905

Title

The Influence of Different Fertilization to Fruit Setting Rate and Yield of Areca( Areca catechu L. )

Yang Fu-su Anhui nongye kexue 2015

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Fertilization significantly improved areca fruit setting rate.
Intervention effect Fertilization significantly improved areca yield per tree.
Observation The 150 gram areca fertilizer plus 300 gram urea treatment had the strongest effect.
Observation Fruit drop was greatest from fruit-bearing to fruit vegetal period.
Intervention effect Adding N to areca specific fertilizer decreased leaf K.
Intervention effect Adding K to areca specific fertilizer increased leaf K.
Association Leaf N content was negatively correlated with areca yield.
Association Leaf K content was negatively correlated with areca yield.
Association Fruit shoot number was the yield component most closely related to yield.
Recommendation Authors conclude adding N and K to areca fertilizer can significantly improve fruit setting.
Recommendation Authors conclude adding N and K to areca fertilizer can significantly improve yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp proportion to 74.56%.

Taxon: Mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicat0
Outcome: pulpe0
Direction: moree0
Value: 74.56%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1281

t0
“Mango cv. Amrapali”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130

Title

Effect of pre-harvest application of GA3, Naphthalene acetic acid and borax on fruit drop, yield and quality of Mango cv. Amrapali

PK Maurya; VK Tripathi; Shubham Gupta Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2020. doi:10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i6ae.13275

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect GA3 at 25 ppm significantly decreased fruit drop to 85.77%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruit retention to 14.23%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruits per panicle to 6.43.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm significantly increased fruit yield to 50.67 kg/tree.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased polar fruit diameter to 9.11 cm.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased equatorial diameter to 7.39 cm.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp to stone ratio to 7.12.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm decreased peel proportion to 14.94%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 50 ppm decreased stone proportion to 10.51%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit weight to 244.59 g.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased fruit volume to 255.43 cc.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased specific gravity to 1.09 g/cc.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased total soluble solids to 18.36 0Brix.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased total sugars to 17.75%.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm increased ascorbic acid to 37.60 mg/100g.
Intervention effect GA3 at 75 ppm reduced titratable acidity to 0.50%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning increased the number of small fruit in three of six years.

Taxon: AppleMalus domesticat0
Treatment: Root pruninge0
Outcome: small fruite0
Direction: increasee0
Qualifier: in 3 of the 6 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Root pruning resulted in a decrease in large fruit and an increase in small fruit in 3 of the 6 years.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–794

t0
“Apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110

Title

Time of Root Pruning Influences Vegetative Growth, Fruit Size, Biennial Bearing, and Yield of `Jonathan' Apple

David C. Ferree Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1992. doi:10.21273/jashs.117.2.198

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Root pruning reduced terminal shoot growth by about 30% during 1985–89 but not 1990.
Intervention effect Root pruning at bloom reduced cumulative apple yield by 14%.
Intervention effect Root pruning in mid-June reduced cumulative apple yield by 20%.
Intervention effect Root pruning reduced cumulative yield efficiency, with little difference among pruning times.
Intervention effect Root pruning reduced biennial bearing intensity regardless of pruning time.
Intervention effect Root pruning decreased the number of large fruit in three of six years.
Intervention effect Yield-adjusted analysis showed root pruning reduced average fruit size.
Intervention effect Root-pruned trees produced firmer fruit and higher soluble solids.
Intervention effect Root pruning increased fruit soluble solids concentration.
Intervention effect Root-pruned trees had less preharvest fruit drop than nonpruned trees.
Intervention effect Under severe drought, root pruning reduced net photosynthesis and transpiration.
Intervention effect Supplemental water increased apple transpiration and harvest fruit size.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cover treatment lowered olive foliar nitrogen and phosphorus content.

Taxon: oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment: H treatmente0
Outcome: olive foliar N and P contente0
Direction: lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“However, the H treatment led to a 37 % decrease in olive yield and lowered olive foliar N and P content as negative short-term effects.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1445

Title

Effects of herbaceous covers and mineral fertilizers on the nutrient stocks and fluxes in a Mediterranean olive grove

S. Marañón-Jiménez; P. Serrano-Ortíz; J. Peñuelas; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2022. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126597

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Maintained herbaceous cover retained higher aboveground nitrogen than no cover, about 2.9 times.
Intervention effect Maintained herbaceous cover retained higher aboveground phosphorus than no cover, about 3.9 times.
Intervention effect Maintained herbaceous cover retained higher aboveground potassium than no cover, about 7.4 times.
Intervention effect Herbaceous cover stimulated olive leaf litter decomposition by about 86%.
Intervention effect Herbaceous cover increased nutrient release from olive leaf litter.
Intervention effect The cover treatment decreased olive yield by 37%.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizer did not improve olive nutritional status or production.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizer decelerated olive litter decomposition by 21%.
Intervention effect Mineral fertilizer decelerated nutrient release.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black 70% shade gave the lowest internode distance in northland.

Taxon: high bush blueberryVaccinium corymbosumt0
Material: northlande0
Treatment: black 70 %e0
Outcome: internodes distancee0
Direction: loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“We observed that internodes distance decrease with an increase of shade black 50%pulan 9& black 70 % northland showed lowest record.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–646

t0
“high bush blueberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97

Title

Evaluation of effect of colored shade nets on plant growth and fruit yield of high bush blueberry in Yingyu County

Abdinur ali Osman; Yuusuf Ali Abddulle; Zhang Xiao ting; et al. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB) 2020. doi:10.12692/ijb/16.5.60-69

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Blueberry internode distance decreased as shade increased.
Intervention effect Black 50% shade gave the lowest internode distance in pulan 9.
Intervention effect Leaf width and length increased with shade level, although black 70% was reported lowest relative to control in both varieties.
Intervention effect Fruit yield decreased with increasing shade in both blueberry varieties.
Intervention effect Black 70% shade gave the lowest fruit weight in pulan 9, 1.1 kg versus 3.7 kg in the open treatment.
Intervention effect Black 70% shade gave the lowest fruit weight in northland, 1.8 kg versus 5.8 kg in the open treatment.
Intervention effect Green 50% shade delayed pulan 9 harvest by 3 days relative to control.
Intervention effect Green 70% shade delayed pulan 9 harvest by 7 days relative to control.
Intervention effect Green 50% shade delayed northland harvest by 4 days.
Intervention effect Green 70% shade delayed northland harvest by 8 days.
Intervention effect Black 30% shade delayed pulan 9 harvest by 5 days relative to control.
Intervention effect Black 50% shade delayed pulan 9 harvest by 11 days relative to control.
Intervention effect Black 70% shade delayed pulan 9 harvest by 14 days relative to control.
Intervention effect Black 30% shade delayed northland harvest by 6 days.
Intervention effect Black 50% shade delayed northland harvest by 12 days.
Intervention effect Black 70% shade delayed northland harvest by 15 days.
Intervention effect Increasing shade negatively affected blueberry growth, especially at 50% and 70%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation strongly reduced oil content per fruit dry weight by 40%.

Taxon: olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment: combination of both stresses (RW and RDI)e4
Outcome: oil content per fruit dry weighte5
Direction: strongly reducede5
Value: 40%e5
Comparator: control treese5

Verbatim

e5
“oil content per fruit dry weight was strongly reduced (40%) compared to control trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1318

e4
“The combination of both stresses (RW and RDI) neither did decrease the fruit yield; however, it significantly reduced oil yield (25% less in 2018)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1226

e0
“olive trees cv Arbosana”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585

Title

Ripening Indices, Olive Yield and Oil Quality in Response to Irrigation With Saline Reclaimed Water and Deficit Strategies

Cristina Romero-Trigueros; Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi; Emilio Nicolás Nicolás; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01243

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction increased olive fruit yield by 35% compared with control trees.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water without water restriction did not result in higher olive oil yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation increased olive oil yield by about 14.5%.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation did not decrease olive fruit yield.
Intervention effect Combined reclaimed water and deficit irrigation significantly reduced olive oil yield by 25% in 2018.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments lowered acidity levels in olive paste compared with full irrigation treatments.
Intervention effect Both RDI treatments reduced oil extractability and fatty yield.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure decreased olive oil quality.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure reduced oleic acid in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased the C18:2/C18:3 ratio in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water exposure increased peroxides in olive oil.
Intervention effect Reclaimed water improved total polyphenols in olive.
Intervention effect Regulated deficit irrigation improved total polyphenols in olive.
Observation In all cases the olive oil parameters met the legislation.
Recommendation Reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation have potential to manage olive oil production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased leaf gas exchanges only during the warmest part of the season in late January and February.

Taxon: blush peart0
Treatment: deficit (50% of standard)e0
Outcome: gas exchangese1
Direction: decreasee1
Qualifier: only during the warmest part of the season in late January and Februarye1
Comparator: standard (100%)e0

Verbatim

t0
“blush pear selection”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–75

e0
“subjected to three irrigation regimes: standard (100%), deficit (50% of standard) and excess (150% of standard)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–270

e1
“The gas exchanges of leaves were low during the entire season. There were no differences among treatments during most of the season, with deficit showing a decrease only during the warmest part of the season in late January and February”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–508

Title

Gas exchanges, fruit growth and yield of ‘ANP-0534’, a blush pear selection, under different irrigation levels

L. Corelli Grappadelli; P. Losciale; J. Lopresti; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2021. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2021.1303.46

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Leaf gas exchanges of the pear selection were low during the entire season.
Intervention effect No differences in leaf gas exchanges among irrigation regimes during most of the season.
Observation Fruit development followed an expolinear pattern in mass.
Observation Absolute growth rates were low at the end of cell division.
Observation AGR values improved after irrigation started, reaching about 2 g per day from late December to late January.
Intervention effect Excess water gave higher AGR values than the other treatments in February.
Intervention effect Fruits under excess water were larger, by about 15% by weight.
Intervention effect Excess water required 50% more water applied than the other treatments.
Intervention effect The number of fruit per tree was higher in the standard irrigation treatment than in the excess irrigation treatment.
Intervention effect Fruit were still larger on the excess irrigation treatment after adjusting fruit size for fruit number per tree.
Intervention effect Yield did not differ among irrigation regimes.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSD reduced fruit weight per tree by 36% and 67% in severity classes 1 and 2.

Taxon: Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome: total weight of fruit/treee0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 36 and 67%e0
Comparator: severity class 1 and 2e0

Verbatim

e0
“total weight of fruit/tree (36 and 67% for severity class 1 and 2, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–660

t0
“Sweet Orange”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66

Title

Effect of Citrus Sudden Death on Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange Cultivars in Brazil

R. B. Bassanezi; L. H. Montesino; A. L. Sanches; et al. Plant Disease 2007. doi:10.1094/pdis-91-11-1407

Other claims from this paper (14)

Association CSD reduced fruit number per tree by 27% and 55%.
Association CSD reduced fruit size by 13% and 25%.
Association CSD reduced fruit weight by 32% and 56%.
Association CSD reduced total soluble solids per fruit by 18% and 42%.
Association CSD increased Brix by 14% and 34%.
Association CSD increased acidity by 16% and 41%.
Association CSD increased TSS per box by 21% and 33%.
Observation Brix/acidity ratio and juice percentage did not change in affected fruit.
Observation Cultivars generally did not differ in proportional yield and quality changes.
Observation Pera showed increased Brix and acidity.
Association Among severely affected trees, youngest plants had greater fruit-number reduction.
Association Trees aged 6 to 10 years had greater acidity and TSS per box increases.
Observation Other proportional changes did not vary by age class.
Mechanism Authors associated damage with reduced water absorption capacity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 50% of leaves reduced new-flush leaf size in both cultivars.

Taxon: oranget0
Treatment: removal of 50% of the leavese0
Outcome: Leaf size of new flushe0
Direction: reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Leaf size of new flush was reduced by removal of 50% of the leaves in both cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–738

t0
“Orange Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin yield, fruit number or fruit size.
Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin soluble solids yield or juice measures.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves decreased fruit yield and soluble solids yield.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves did not affect Brix or Brix-to-acid ratio.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of leaves had little effect on canopy size.
Intervention effect Removing 25% of canopy leaves had no measured effects.
Association Fruit weight increased with leaf area per fruit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borax at 0.5% reduced titratable acidity.

Taxon: Aonlat0
Treatment: borax @ 0.5%e1
Outcome: titratable aciditye0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 1.36 and 1.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“titratable acidity (1.36 and 1.30%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1382

e1
“borax @ 0.5% results an increase in ascorbic acid content (640.03 and 630.05 mg/100g, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1275

t0
“Aonla”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–109

Title

Effect of foliar application of Boron, Zinc and NAA on fruit retention, yield and quality attributes of Aonla

V.K. Tripathi; Viveka Nand Progressive Horticulture 2022. doi:10.5958/2249-5258.2022.00009.4

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm reduced fruit drop in both years.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased fruit retention.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm gave maximum fruit yield.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased fruit length.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased fruit width.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased fruit weight.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased fruit volume.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased specific gravity.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm increased pulp weight.
Intervention effect NAA at 40ppm maximized pulp to stone ratio.
Intervention effect Borax at 0.5% increased ascorbic acid content.
Intervention effect Borax at 0.5% reduced stone weight.
Intervention effect Zinc sulphate at 0.6% increased total soluble solids.
Intervention effect Zinc sulphate at 0.6% increased total sugars.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics