View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium dressing partly compensated the peach yield decrease associated with soil lime.
Treatmentpotassium dressing e0 Qualifierto some extent e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In peach, the lime content of soil decrease d the yield but it could be compensated by potassium dressing to some extent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–754 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease at Kanafar correlated with higher solar radiation from early spring to early summer (by 13.9-27.1 W per square metre).
TaxonCabernet Sauvignon t0 Treatmenthigher solar radiation from early-spring to early-summer e2 Outcomedecrease in yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “Cabernet Sauvignon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29 e1 “the decrease in yield at Kanafar correlated with ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1299 e2 “higher solar radiation from early-spring to early-summer (by 13.9–27.1 W m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1435 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Regulated deficit irrigation tended to decrease olive weight.
Directiontended to decrease e3 Comparatorfull irrigation e6 Verbatim
e3 “The RDI strategy did not decrease the fruit yield despite the fact that olive weight tended to decrease , and it increased the oil yield by ~14.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1078 e6 “full irrigation (FI, 100% of ETc) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–447 e0 “olive trees cv Arbosana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–585 Other claims from this paper (17) Mechanism hypothesis original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest increased yield per vine caused the decrease in skin catechin.
Qualifierincreased yield per vine e0 Verbatim
e0 “it is suggested that the decrease was caused by increased yield per vine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–673 e1 “An increase in node number linearly decrease d skin catechin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–595 t0 “Vitis vinifera L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–106 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root rot was associated with a decrease of over 30% in calcium fruit yield .
Organ / stagecalcium fruit e0 Outcomecalcium fruit yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “plant mortality, leading to a decrease of over 30% in calcium fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–727 e1 “Approximately 20 to 30% of C. humilis at the full culture stage exhibited symptoms of root rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–607 t0 “Fusarium tricinctum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–35 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative dry weight yield decrease with increasing salinity was about 10 to 15% per dS m-1, varying among clones.
Treatmentincreasing salinity e5 Outcomerelative decrease in dry weight yield e5 Valueabout 10 to 15% per dS m-1 e5 Verbatim
e1 “Clones of eight hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) crosses were tested for salt tolerance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–731 e5 “the relative decrease in dry weight yield with increasing salinity varied among clones and ranged from about 10 to 15% per dS m-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1512 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield decrease , berry quality parameters and quality index had significant linear relationships with seasonal evapotranspiration deficit.
Treatmentrelative seasonal ET deficit e0 Outcomerelative decrease in yield, berry quality parameters, Q c e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Significant linear functions were found between a relative decrease in yield , berry quality parameters, Q c and a relative seasonal ET deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–968 t0 “table grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–160 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
tree-height was the relative decrease .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree-height was the relative decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors advise gradually reducing water applications over several years to avoid a sudden yield decrease .
Outcomegradually reduce water applications over several years e0 Verbatim
e0 “to avoid a sudden decrease in yield , it would be necessary to gradually reduce water applications over several years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1635 t0 “Vitis labruscana Bailey ‘Concord’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–55 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Summer pruning tended to decrease yield .
Treatmentsummer pruning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a tendency for summer pruning to decrease yield (up to nearly 30 kg/tree lower yield s), average fruit dry matter (up to 0.5% lower average predicted dry matter), and abundance of high dry matter fruits (up to 11% fewer high predicted dry matter fruits) was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1509 t0 “d’Anjou pear ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 78–90 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.