View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping P. maximum cv. Mombaça caused a greater decrease in maize grain yield .
TreatmentIntercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maize e0 Outcomemaize grain yield e0 Directionhigher decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping of P. maximum cv. Mombaça with maize showed higher decrease in maize grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1015 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13.
Treatmentrecurrent selection for grain yield e1 Outcomeadditive genetic variance e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Synthetic Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 e1 “Estimates of additive genetic variance did not decrease with recurrent selection for grain yield in BS13 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1857 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
Outcomesorghum grain yield e0 Qualifier2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Salicylic acid use sometimes causes growth retardation, sterility and yield decrease .
Outcomegrowth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the use of SA in some cases may lead to negative results – growth retardation, sterility, and yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2349 t0 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 t1 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield .
Treatmentshort-term implementation of conservation tillage e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
The smallest maize yield decrease occurred with late January to February sowings.
Treatmentlate sowings between January and February e0 Verbatim
e0 “the smallest in the late sowings between January and February ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–885 t0 “WATER DEFICIENCY ON THE MAIZE GRAIN YIELD DECREASE IN THE CATARINENSE FAR WEST ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated resistant lines had a small but significant yield decrease relative to susceptible lines.
Materialresistant lines e0 Comparatorsusceptible lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “A small but significant decrease in yield was observed for noninoculated resistant lines in contrast to susceptible lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 t0 “Spring Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Microgreen yield did not decrease under the intermittent lighting schedule.
TreatmentIntermittent LED lighting t0 Directiondoes not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the same time, the yield does not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–444 t0 “Intermittent LED lighting helps reduce energy costs when growing microgreens on vertical controlled environment farms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease with emergence date followed a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season.
Treatmentemergence date e7 Verbatim
e0 “seedling emergence uniformity in corn (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–63 e7 “Yield decrease as a function of emergence date followed either a quadratic or linear trend in each growing season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1887 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Each additional degree of future summer warming could decrease corn yield by 13 %.
Treatmentfuture warming during summer months e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “of future warming during summer months, corn and soybean yield s could potentially decrease by 13 % and 16%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–907 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.