View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev spring wheat had a climate-induced yield decrease of 17–30%.
climate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mogilev spring barley had a climate-induced yield decrease of 22–33%.
climate-induced e1 Verbatim
e0 “In Mogilev region, this decrease was lower: spring wheat – 17–30 %, spring barley – 22–33 %, oats – 35–36 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–732 e1 “most of them were characterized by a climate-induced decrease in their yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–448 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated rainfed spring maize yield declined with decrease in solar radiation.
decrease in solar radiation e0 simulated rainfed spring maize yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was severely decrease d trend in simulated rainfed spring maize yield with the increment of maximum and minimum temperature, decrease in solar radiation and decrease carbondioxide concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1548 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit at S1 caused a relative yield decrease .
early vegetative (S1) e0 relative decrease of yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The water deficit at early vegetative (S1) and pod filling to early maturing (S4) was sensitive to the relative decrease of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1318 t0 “Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–126 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed the grain yield decrease to fewer productive tillers per square metre.
COMMON WINTER WHEAT t0 productive tillers e0 Verbatim
t0 “COMMON WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–86 e0 “The main reason for the decrease in grain yield is the decrease in the number of productive tillers / m 2 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield increase in Koshihikari could abundantly compensate for the yield decrease in Kanto 100 in mixed stands.
yield decrease in Kanto 100 e7 could abundantly compensate e7 Verbatim
t0 “Mixed Planting of Rice Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57 e7 “the yield increase in Koshihikari could abundantly compensate for the yield decrease in Kanto 100 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1206 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Variation in grain yield tended to decrease as seeding rate increased in annual canarygrass.
annual canarygrass e0 the seeding rate increased e5 Variation in grain yield e5 Verbatim
e0 “annual canarygrass growers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–380 e5 “Variation in grain yield tended to decrease as the seeding rate increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1340 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Living mulch did not decrease apple yield compared with herbicide fallow.
did not decrease e1 herbicide fallow e1 Verbatim
e0 “fruit of Malus domestica Borkh. cv. ‘Sampion’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–159 e1 “Compared to herbicide fallow, living mulch did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–372 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe drought, Sabalan and Zarrin had the largest grain yield decrease .
Sabalan’ and ‘Zarrin e0 Verbatim
e0 “the highest decrease in grain yield as well as concomitant increase in proline content were seen in bread wheat of ‘Sabalan’ and ‘Zarrin’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1184 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
basal 25% defoliation e0 TDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Zea mays
Glycine max
Oryza sativa
Malus domestica.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata