View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions.
Treatmentpresence of root hairs e1 Directiondid not decrease e1 Qualifierunder optimal conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “barley (Hordeum vulgare ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–992 e1 “the presence of root hairs did not decrease yield under optimal conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2267–2341 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Violations of plant-microorganism interrelations caused by cultivation technologies can decrease yield potential of sunflower.
Treatmentcultivation technologies e2 Verbatim
e1 “are able to decrease yield potential of agricultural crops including sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–819 e2 “such as cultivation technologies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–739 Mechanism author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Water yield could decrease due to greater evapotranspiration from the crops.
Qualifierhigher evapotranspiration (ET) rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “Water yield would potentially decrease because of higher evapotranspiration (ET) rate from switchgrass and Miscanthus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2394–2511 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Elevated temperature was projected to decrease future soybean yield .
Treatmentelevated temperature e0 QualifierFor the period from 2081 to 2100 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the period from 2081 to 2100, soybean yield was projected to decrease due to elevated temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–913 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346 e1 “oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil did not decrease mean yield of the three rice cultivars.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Bromoxynil did not decrease the average yield of any of the three cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931 t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha.
TreatmentPost-harvest residues e0 Verbatim
e0 “Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–157 t0 “SUGARCANE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderately conductive irrigation water caused no appreciable yield decrease .
Treatmentwater with moderate electrical conductivity e0 Directionwithout an appreciable decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The cucumbers are irrigated with water with moderate electrical conductivity without an appreciable decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ASN+DMPP alleviated the yield decrease from excessive nitrogen fertilizer.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “ASN+DMPP could also alleviate the yield decrease effect caused by excessive application of nitrogen fertilizers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1107 t0 “nitrate accumulation of pakchoi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Watermelon blight can decrease watermelon yield and quality.
Outcomewatermelon yields and quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “Watermelon blight,an important soil-borne and seeds-borne disease,could decrease the watermelon yield s and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.