Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seedling root dip of chlorpyrifos or isofenphos followed by ethoprophos granules decreased the incidence of rice gall midge to 5.1% silver shoots at Chiplima, India.

Taxon: paddy ricee1
Treatment: A seedling root dip of either chlorpyrifos or isofenphose1
Interactor: Orseolia oryzaeOrseolia oryzaee0pest
Outcome: incidencee1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 5.1%e1
Setting: Chiplima, Indiae2

Verbatim

e0
“the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–98

e1
“A seedling root dip of either chlorpyrifos or isofenphos at 0.02% a.i. for 12 h, followed by one application of ethoprophos granules at 1 kg a.i./ha 30 d.a.t. gave good control of the midge, with an average incidence of only 5.1% silver shoots, and a yield of 3935 and 3840 kg/ha of paddy rice in 1980 and 1981 respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–639

e2
“Field trials were carried out at Chiplima, India during the wet seasons of 1980 and 1981”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–314

Title

Effects of insecticides on the rice gall midge,Orseolia oryzaeand its parasite,Platygaster oryzae

A. P. Samalo; P. B. Parida; G. C. Mishra Tropical Pest Management 1983. doi:10.1080/09670878309370794

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late May sowing decreased parsnip yield by 23.0 t/ha versus control.

Taxon: parsnipPastinaca sativat0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 23.0 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“When sowing in the following periods, a significant decrease in yield was observed compared to the control, namely: for the 3rd decade of April – by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, for the 1st decade of May – by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%, for the 2nd decade of May – by 17.4 t/ha, or 38.6%, for the 3rd decade of May – by 23.0 t/ha, or 51.1%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2705

t0
“parsnip”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2376–2383

Title

Scientific journal «Plant and Soil Science» Font Size Make font size smaller Make font size default Make font size larger Language Select Language User You are logged in as... pikovska My Journals My Profile Log Out Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item Supplementary files Finding References Email this article Email the author About The Authors O. O. Komar orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine старший викладач кафедри овочівництва і закритого грунту I. O. Fedosiy orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine доцент, завідувач кафедри овочівництва і закритого ґрунту O. O. Siedova orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-1560 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine магістр 1 року Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Author Fees This journal charges the following author fees. Publication of one page: 60.00 (UAH). The DOI is paid separately - 200 (UAH) per article. The fee include those of the journal’s publishing, online hosting and archiving. The ability of authors to pay the fee does not influence the peer review process. No fee can be paid prior to the final positive decision of the reviewers and the editor in charge, regarding the article proposed to be evaluated in order to be published. Depending upon each particular case, the fee can be covered by the journal edition. Details Recipient: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Address: Heroyiv Oborony st., 15, Kyiv, Ukraine. IBAN: №UA038201720313211001202016289 Bank: State Treasury Service of Ukraine, Kyiv EDRPOU 00493706 ІPN 004937026501 Payment: full name, personal account Personal Account 18.02.06.06.01 Tel .: +38 044 527 87 20 Email: nti_dep@nubip.edu.ua Example of bibliographic description The list of journals included in scientometric databases: - Scopus (Uкraine, Belarus, Poland, Russia); - Іndex Copernicus; - Web of Sciense (humanities, natural sciences, social sciences); Search algorithm and calculation scientometric indicator: - Scopus; - Publish or Perish; - Google Scholar; - SNIP-іndex journal. Home About User Home Search Current Archives Statistics Reminder for authors Agreement Editorial Board Home > Vol 12, No 3 (2021) > Komar Influence abiotic factors on the growth and development of plants parsnip

O. O. Komar; I. O. Fedosiy; O. O. Siedova PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE 2021. doi:10.31548/agr2021.03.100

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wabe 300 EC foliar application at 0.5 L/ha was highly effective in controlling yellow rust and stem rust of wheat compared with control treatments.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Wabe 300 EC foliar application at the rate of 0.5 L/hae0
Interactor: Puccinia striiformis f.sp.triticiPuccinia striiformist0pathogen
Second interactor: Puccinia graminis f.sp.triticiPuccinia graminist0pathogen
Outcome: controlling yellow and stem ruste0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Comparator: control treatmentse1

Verbatim

t0
“Stem rust (Puccinia graminis f.sp.tritici) and Yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici) of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–164

e0
“Wabe 300 EC foliar application at the rate of 0.5 L/ha with 200 liter water per hectare was highly effective in controlling yellow and stem rust of wheat and increased grain yield of wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1685

e1
“fungicide treated plots were showed significant difference compared to the control treatments in all variables”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1495

Title

Effects of WABE 300 EC Fungicide against Stem rust (Puccinia graminis f.sp.tritici) and Yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici) of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Zerhun Tomas Lera Scientia. Technology, science and society. 2024. doi:10.59324/stss.2024.1(1).03

Other claims from this paper (4)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A preferable management mode for tomato is N 286.88 kg·hm-2 and K2O 286.88 kg hm-2 with irrigation at pF 2.0 (10 kPa) upper and pF 2.49 (30 kPa) lower soil water suction limits.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume4
Treatment: N 286.88 kg·hm-2,K2O 286.88 kg hm-2e6
Outcome: preferable irrigation and fertilization management modee6
Qualifier: pF 2.0(10 kPa) and pF 2.49(30 kPa)e6

Verbatim

e6
“the preferable irrigation and fertilization management mode of fertilization amount was N 286.88 kg·hm-2,K2O 286.88 kg hm-2,soil water suction of the irrigation upper limit and lower limit were respective pF 2.0(10 kPa) and pF 2.49(30 kPa)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1360

e4
“the quality of tomato fruit could improved by the proper increase of the irrigation upper limit and the decrease of the conventional fertilization amount significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1019

Title

Study on effect of irrigation and fertilization on yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato

Dan Yang Turang feiliao 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 14.05%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 10.50%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 5.09%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 5.01%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early June sowing decreased parsnip yield by 31.7 t/ha versus control.

Taxon: parsnipPastinaca sativat0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 31.7 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“When sowing in the following periods, a significant decrease in yield was observed compared to the control, namely: for the 3rd decade of April – by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, for the 1st decade of May – by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%, for the 2nd decade of May – by 17.4 t/ha, or 38.6%, for the 3rd decade of May – by 23.0 t/ha, or 51.1%, for the 1st decade of June – by 31.7 t/ha, 70.6% compared to the control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2780

t0
“parsnip”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2376–2383

Title

Scientific journal «Plant and Soil Science» Font Size Make font size smaller Make font size default Make font size larger Language Select Language User You are logged in as... pikovska My Journals My Profile Log Out Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item Supplementary files Finding References Email this article Email the author About The Authors O. O. Komar orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine старший викладач кафедри овочівництва і закритого грунту I. O. Fedosiy orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine доцент, завідувач кафедри овочівництва і закритого ґрунту O. O. Siedova orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-1560 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine магістр 1 року Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Author Fees This journal charges the following author fees. Publication of one page: 60.00 (UAH). The DOI is paid separately - 200 (UAH) per article. The fee include those of the journal’s publishing, online hosting and archiving. The ability of authors to pay the fee does not influence the peer review process. No fee can be paid prior to the final positive decision of the reviewers and the editor in charge, regarding the article proposed to be evaluated in order to be published. Depending upon each particular case, the fee can be covered by the journal edition. Details Recipient: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Address: Heroyiv Oborony st., 15, Kyiv, Ukraine. IBAN: №UA038201720313211001202016289 Bank: State Treasury Service of Ukraine, Kyiv EDRPOU 00493706 ІPN 004937026501 Payment: full name, personal account Personal Account 18.02.06.06.01 Tel .: +38 044 527 87 20 Email: nti_dep@nubip.edu.ua Example of bibliographic description The list of journals included in scientometric databases: - Scopus (Uкraine, Belarus, Poland, Russia); - Іndex Copernicus; - Web of Sciense (humanities, natural sciences, social sciences); Search algorithm and calculation scientometric indicator: - Scopus; - Publish or Perish; - Google Scholar; - SNIP-іndex journal. Home About User Home Search Current Archives Statistics Reminder for authors Agreement Editorial Board Home > Vol 12, No 3 (2021) > Komar Influence abiotic factors on the growth and development of plants parsnip

O. O. Komar; I. O. Fedosiy; O. O. Siedova PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE 2021. doi:10.31548/agr2021.03.100

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6Le0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weight per paniclee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 26.05%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6L increased significantly by 26.05%, 8.22%, 14.05%, 10.50%, 5.09%, and 5.01%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1715

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics