Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: tuberous root weight per plante0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 32.39%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing N by 28% produced no significant difference in sink and source characteristics of Tianyou 998.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Material: Tianyou 998e4
Treatment: Reduction of N by 28%e4
Outcome: sink and source characteristicse0
Direction: no significant differencee4
Comparator: conventional Ne1
Setting: field experimente0

Verbatim

e0
“on rice sink and source characteristics were studied using four varieties(Yuejingsimiao 2,Guixiangzhan,Huayou 8305 and Tianyou 998) in field experiment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–266

e1
“Compared by conventional N,reduction of N by 28% would maintain or promote the rice source and sink coordination,which resulted in no significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–430

e4
“Reduction of N by 28% improved sink capacity and ratio of spikelets No.and leaf area in Yuejingsimiao 2 and Guixiangzhan,improved available filled ratio of sink in Huayou 8305,while there was no significant difference in Tianyou 998”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–875

Title

Effects of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Source and Sink Characteristics of Early /Late Season Rice in South China and Their Mechanism

MO Zhao-we 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% relative to conventional N caused no significant decrease in rice yield.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% would maintain or promote rice source and sink coordination relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Yuejingsimiao 2 by 11.99% relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Guixiangzhan by 5.51% relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% increased grain yield of Huayou 8305 by 6.46% relative to conventional N.
Mechanism The yield increase under 28% N reduction is attributed to enhanced photosynthesis or sheath and stem transfer ability in rice.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% improved sink capacity, spikelet ratio and leaf area of Yuejingsimiao 2 relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% improved sink capacity, spikelet ratio and leaf area of Guixiangzhan relative to conventional N.
Intervention effect Reducing N by 28% improved the available filled ratio of sink in Huayou 8305 relative to conventional N.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early May sowing decreased parsnip yield by 8.8 t/ha versus control.

Taxon: parsnipPastinaca sativat0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8.8 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“When sowing in the following periods, a significant decrease in yield was observed compared to the control, namely: for the 3rd decade of April – by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, for the 1st decade of May – by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2601

t0
“parsnip”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2376–2383

Title

Scientific journal «Plant and Soil Science» Font Size Make font size smaller Make font size default Make font size larger Language Select Language User You are logged in as... pikovska My Journals My Profile Log Out Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item Supplementary files Finding References Email this article Email the author About The Authors O. O. Komar orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine старший викладач кафедри овочівництва і закритого грунту I. O. Fedosiy orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine доцент, завідувач кафедри овочівництва і закритого ґрунту O. O. Siedova orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-1560 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine магістр 1 року Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Author Fees This journal charges the following author fees. Publication of one page: 60.00 (UAH). The DOI is paid separately - 200 (UAH) per article. The fee include those of the journal’s publishing, online hosting and archiving. The ability of authors to pay the fee does not influence the peer review process. No fee can be paid prior to the final positive decision of the reviewers and the editor in charge, regarding the article proposed to be evaluated in order to be published. Depending upon each particular case, the fee can be covered by the journal edition. Details Recipient: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Address: Heroyiv Oborony st., 15, Kyiv, Ukraine. IBAN: №UA038201720313211001202016289 Bank: State Treasury Service of Ukraine, Kyiv EDRPOU 00493706 ІPN 004937026501 Payment: full name, personal account Personal Account 18.02.06.06.01 Tel .: +38 044 527 87 20 Email: nti_dep@nubip.edu.ua Example of bibliographic description The list of journals included in scientometric databases: - Scopus (Uкraine, Belarus, Poland, Russia); - Іndex Copernicus; - Web of Sciense (humanities, natural sciences, social sciences); Search algorithm and calculation scientometric indicator: - Scopus; - Publish or Perish; - Google Scholar; - SNIP-іndex journal. Home About User Home Search Current Archives Statistics Reminder for authors Agreement Editorial Board Home > Vol 12, No 3 (2021) > Komar Influence abiotic factors on the growth and development of plants parsnip

O. O. Komar; I. O. Fedosiy; O. O. Siedova PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE 2021. doi:10.31548/agr2021.03.100

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates by 3.00-15.69%.

Treatment: intercroppede4
Outcome: mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD)e5
Direction: increasee5
Value: 3.00-15.69%e5

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4
“the intercropped maize root length density (RLD) increased by 33.94-102.84% in the 0-40 cm soil layer, which contributed to an increase in the soil porosity (SP) of 5.58-10.10% in the 0-30 cm soil layer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1502

e5
“an increase in the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD) of 3.00-15.69%, an increase in the geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates (GMD) of 8.16-26.42%, a decrease in the soil bulk density (SBD) of 4.02-7.35%, and an increase in the soil organic matter content (SOM) of 0.60-4.35%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1796

Title

Rice Under Dry Cultivation–Maize Intercropping Improves Soil Environment and Increases Total Yield by Regulating Belowground Root Growth

Zhihai Wu; Bei Xue; Shiwen Wang; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13212957

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Rice under dry cultivation-maize intercropping increased total yield by 8.63% compared with monoculture.
Observation Competition indices A, K and ATER were positive or at least 1, indicating a yield advantage of rice-maize intercropping.
Observation The competition ratio (CR) of rice-maize intercropping was positive or at least 1, indicating a yield advantage.
Intervention effect Intercropped maize root length density increased by 33.94-102.84% in the 0-40 cm soil layer.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased soil porosity by 5.58-10.10% in the 0-30 cm soil layer.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased the geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates by 8.16-26.42%.
Intervention effect Intercropping decreased soil bulk density by 4.02-7.35%.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased soil organic matter content by 0.60-4.35%.
Intervention effect Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation in the plant was significantly higher in intercropping than in monoculture.
Recommendation Rice under dry cultivation-maize intercropping is feasible in Northeast China.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased the geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates by 8.16-26.42%.

Treatment: intercroppede4
Outcome: geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates (GMD)e5
Direction: increasee5
Value: 8.16-26.42%e5

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4
“the intercropped maize root length density (RLD) increased by 33.94-102.84% in the 0-40 cm soil layer, which contributed to an increase in the soil porosity (SP) of 5.58-10.10% in the 0-30 cm soil layer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1502

e5
“an increase in the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD) of 3.00-15.69%, an increase in the geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates (GMD) of 8.16-26.42%, a decrease in the soil bulk density (SBD) of 4.02-7.35%, and an increase in the soil organic matter content (SOM) of 0.60-4.35%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1796

Title

Rice Under Dry Cultivation–Maize Intercropping Improves Soil Environment and Increases Total Yield by Regulating Belowground Root Growth

Zhihai Wu; Bei Xue; Shiwen Wang; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13212957

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Rice under dry cultivation-maize intercropping increased total yield by 8.63% compared with monoculture.
Observation Competition indices A, K and ATER were positive or at least 1, indicating a yield advantage of rice-maize intercropping.
Observation The competition ratio (CR) of rice-maize intercropping was positive or at least 1, indicating a yield advantage.
Intervention effect Intercropped maize root length density increased by 33.94-102.84% in the 0-40 cm soil layer.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased soil porosity by 5.58-10.10% in the 0-30 cm soil layer.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates by 3.00-15.69%.
Intervention effect Intercropping decreased soil bulk density by 4.02-7.35%.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased soil organic matter content by 0.60-4.35%.
Intervention effect Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium accumulation in the plant was significantly higher in intercropping than in monoculture.
Recommendation Rice under dry cultivation-maize intercropping is feasible in Northeast China.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: fresh weight of tuberous root per hectaree0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 23.04%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1999-2000, stalk borer infestation index in sugarcane was significantly lower in plots with Trichogramma chilonis releases (1.02%) than in control plots (4.45%).

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishiie0
Interactor: sugarcane stalk borere0pest
Second interactor: Trichogramma chilonis IshiiTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: infestation index of stalk borere1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 1.02%e1
Qualifier: 1999-2000e1
Comparator: control plotse1

Verbatim

e0
“the effect of releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in minimising populations of the sugarcane stalk borer (Chilo auricilius) and thereby increasing the yield of sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–226

e1
“The infestation index of stalk borer was significantly higher in control plots than in treated plots in both years, 4.45% and 1.562% in control plots and 1.02% and 0.578% in treated plots during the years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–686

Title

ECO-FRIENDLY APPROACH FOR MINIMISING POPULATIONS OF SUGARCANE STALK BORER (CHILO AURICILIUS) IN THE TARAI BELT OF UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

Rajiv Singhal; Moni Gupta; Dev Narayan; et al. International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Proceedings of the XXIV Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 17-21 September 2001. Volume 2. 2001

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2000-2001, stalk borer infestation index in sugarcane was significantly lower in plots with Trichogramma chilonis releases (0.578%) than in control plots (1.562%).

Taxon: sugarcanee0
Treatment: releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishiie0
Interactor: sugarcane stalk borere0pest
Second interactor: Trichogramma chilonis IshiiTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: infestation index of stalk borere1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 0.578%e1
Qualifier: 2000-2001e1
Comparator: control plotse1

Verbatim

e0
“the effect of releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in minimising populations of the sugarcane stalk borer (Chilo auricilius) and thereby increasing the yield of sugarcane”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–226

e1
“The infestation index of stalk borer was significantly higher in control plots than in treated plots in both years, 4.45% and 1.562% in control plots and 1.02% and 0.578% in treated plots during the years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–686

Title

ECO-FRIENDLY APPROACH FOR MINIMISING POPULATIONS OF SUGARCANE STALK BORER (CHILO AURICILIUS) IN THE TARAI BELT OF UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

Rajiv Singhal; Moni Gupta; Dev Narayan; et al. International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Proceedings of the XXIV Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 17-21 September 2001. Volume 2. 2001

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-May sowing decreased parsnip yield by 17.4 t/ha versus control.

Taxon: parsnipPastinaca sativat0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 17.4 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“When sowing in the following periods, a significant decrease in yield was observed compared to the control, namely: for the 3rd decade of April – by 3.5 t/ha, or 7.7%, for the 1st decade of May – by 8.8 t/ha, or 19.6%, for the 2nd decade of May – by 17.4 t/ha, or 38.6%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2653

t0
“parsnip”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2376–2383

Title

Scientific journal «Plant and Soil Science» Font Size Make font size smaller Make font size default Make font size larger Language Select Language User You are logged in as... pikovska My Journals My Profile Log Out Article Tools Print this article Indexing metadata How to cite item Supplementary files Finding References Email this article Email the author About The Authors O. O. Komar orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine старший викладач кафедри овочівництва і закритого грунту I. O. Fedosiy orcid National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine доцент, завідувач кафедри овочівництва і закритого ґрунту O. O. Siedova orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-1560 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Ukraine магістр 1 року Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Author Fees This journal charges the following author fees. Publication of one page: 60.00 (UAH). The DOI is paid separately - 200 (UAH) per article. The fee include those of the journal’s publishing, online hosting and archiving. The ability of authors to pay the fee does not influence the peer review process. No fee can be paid prior to the final positive decision of the reviewers and the editor in charge, regarding the article proposed to be evaluated in order to be published. Depending upon each particular case, the fee can be covered by the journal edition. Details Recipient: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Address: Heroyiv Oborony st., 15, Kyiv, Ukraine. IBAN: №UA038201720313211001202016289 Bank: State Treasury Service of Ukraine, Kyiv EDRPOU 00493706 ІPN 004937026501 Payment: full name, personal account Personal Account 18.02.06.06.01 Tel .: +38 044 527 87 20 Email: nti_dep@nubip.edu.ua Example of bibliographic description The list of journals included in scientometric databases: - Scopus (Uкraine, Belarus, Poland, Russia); - Іndex Copernicus; - Web of Sciense (humanities, natural sciences, social sciences); Search algorithm and calculation scientometric indicator: - Scopus; - Publish or Perish; - Google Scholar; - SNIP-іndex journal. Home About User Home Search Current Archives Statistics Reminder for authors Agreement Editorial Board Home > Vol 12, No 3 (2021) > Komar Influence abiotic factors on the growth and development of plants parsnip

O. O. Komar; I. O. Fedosiy; O. O. Siedova PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE 2021. doi:10.31548/agr2021.03.100

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: TR6Se0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: AGFRe0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: increasede0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“under TR6S, they significantly increased by 20.78%, 9.91%, 16.19%, 9.28%, 5.01%, and 4.14%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1825

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics