View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
TBRV caused a significant yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 e1 “The major impact of TBRV was a significant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1701 t0 “Quantitative and qualitative impact of Tomato Black Ring Virus (TBRV) on Merlot and Cabernet franc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The seed yield decrease in pinto beans was comparable to reductions in leaf and stem biomass.
decrease in seed yield e0 reductions in biomass of leaves and stems e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in seed yield was comparable to reductions in biomass of leaves and stems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–665 t0 “pinto beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
Further decrease in the space between plants e4 abrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
reduction in seed rate e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield .
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in biological yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree canopy cover within fields tended to decrease crop yield .
inside the fields e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “tree canopy cover and tree density inside the fields tended to decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
pathogen inoculation e0 don’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Withholding nitrogen after flowering did not decrease green soybean yield .
withholding nitrogen after flowering e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no decrease in yield in treatments withholding nitrogen after flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–552 e1 “In green soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–217 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
did not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Prunus cerasus
Oryza sativa
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max