Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

16,586 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2,650 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 19 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying all N to V9 did not significantly decrease corn yield.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Delaying all the N to V9e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54

e0
“Delaying all the N to V9 did not significantly decrease yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1125

Title

Corn yield following a delayed application of nitrogen

Brian H. Yoder Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) 2018

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect In corn following soybean, delaying the second half of N to as late as R2 did not cause significant yield loss.
Intervention effect Corn with N applied at R3 yielded 92% of the yield of corn with the second application at V3.
Intervention effect Delaying all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15 did not decrease corn yield significantly.
Intervention effect Delaying all 224 kg N ha-1 through V15 reduced corn yield with application at VT, R2 and R3 (12, 19 and 37% less).
Intervention effect In corn following corn, delaying the second half of N to R3 gave 96% of the yield of the second application at V3.
Intervention effect In corn following corn, none of the delayed N timings significantly lowered yield.
Intervention effect Delaying all N to V12 reduced corn yield by 11% relative to earlier timings.
Intervention effect Delaying all N to R3 reduced corn yield by 42%.
Recommendation Without N at planting, N must be applied by mid-vegetative stages to prevent corn yield loss.
Intervention effect When half the N was applied at planting, delaying application until past pollination caused surprisingly little corn yield loss.
Observation Split-N corn treatments recovered healthy leaf color (SPAD) no matter how late N was applied.
Intervention effect With no N at planting, corn plants could not regain full leaf color or yield if N was applied later than mid-vegetative stages.
Recommendation If all N is delayed, application should be made before plants reach mid-vegetative growth stages.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 could increase or decrease yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: PP333e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: increase or decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“PP333 applied could lead to plant height reduction, leaf smaller, yield increase or decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1168

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56

Title

Effect of culture factors on growth and yield of soybean II. Effect of fertilizer application, watering, growth regulate measures on yield

Wang Wen-xiu Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Scieves 2003

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Seedling-stage fertilizer and watering promoted middle organ growth.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage fertilizer and watering increased upper organ growth.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers enhanced nutrient absorption in corresponding growth-centre organs.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean nitrogen content.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean phosphorus content.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased soybean potassium content.
Association Later fertilizer application tended to raise seed protein content.
Intervention effect Fertilization from initial flowering to 10 days later produced 15.6%～24.2% higher yield than the check.
Intervention effect PP333 reduced plant height.
Intervention effect PP333 made leaves smaller.
Intervention effect Huafu increased yield by 5.8%.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023 there was a decrease in yield compared with near-normal precipitation in 2021.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

e1
“there was a decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1322

t0
“corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39

Title

Cover crops did not change optimal corn nitrogen rate over three variable precipitation seasons in the Western Corn Belt

Tauana Ferreira de Almeida; Lucas Pecci Canisares; Emily Robinson; et al. Agronomy Journal 2025. doi:10.1002/agj2.70129

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cover crops did not decrease corn grain yield at the AONR.
Intervention effect Cover crops did not increase the AONR compared with the no-cover crop treatment.
Observation In 2021, with near-normal precipitation, corn yield at the AONR and the AONR were the highest of the three years.
Observation In 2022, with about half the 30-year average rainfall, yield at the AONR decreased across treatments.
Intervention effect In 2023, cover crop treatments had no significant effect on the AONR.
Mechanism Weather was the dominant factor driving the AONR.
Recommendation The results do not support the need for higher N rates after winter cover crops.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield tended to decrease above 32°C.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome: Maize yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: temperatures exceed 32°Ce0
Setting: Upper East regione0

Verbatim

e0
“Maize yield in the Upper East region tends to decrease when temperatures exceed 32°C”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–858

Title

Marginal Impact of climate variability on crop yields in Ghana

Samuel Asante Gyamerah; Victor Owusu; Stephen Oppong Kwakye Scientific African 2024. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02314

Other claims from this paper (3)

Association Maximum and minimum temperature were the strongest climate indicators for maize yield.
Association Maize yield tended to increase around 24°C.
Association Across studied districts, maize yield tended to be maximal around 24°C.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield.

Taxon: Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment: low combined densitiese0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: do not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“low combined densities do not decrease yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122

t0
“Brassica napus L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95

Title

Effect of Insect Herbivory on the Architecture and Seed Production of Canola, Brassica napus L.

H.A. Cárcamo Journal of Entomological Science 2012. doi:10.18474/0749-8004-47.1.44

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Intermediate combined insect density reduced canola grain yield under severe dryness.
Intervention effect High combined insect density reduced canola grain yield under severe dryness.
Intervention effect Intermediate combined insect density reduced raceme number and pods per raceme under severe dryness.
Intervention effect High combined insect density reduced raceme number and pods per raceme under severe dryness.
Intervention effect In more humid 2002 conditions, weevil damage at 20 adults per cage was more apparent than in 2000.
Intervention effect At low or moderate densities, late-season pests did not appear to stimulate canola overcompensation.
Observation The study found no indication of competition between the two insect pests.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: Higher seasonal totalse0
Outcome: lint yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391

t0
“Cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32

Title

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

Nathan B. O'Berry; Joel C. Faircloth; Michael A. Jones; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect FM 960 BR July height fell 25% with MPB in South Carolina in 2006.
Intervention effect DP 444 BG/RR July height fell 12% with MPB.
Intervention effect DP 555 BG/RR July height fell 13% with MPB.
Observation Actual height reductions did not differ among cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced harvest height by 8 to 34%.
Intervention effect MPB reduced height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%.
Intervention effect MPB enhanced maturity across cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5%.
Association Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment: insect visits were reduced by 50%e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: little decreasee0
Value: 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693

e1
“in sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220

Title

Supplementary material from "Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels"

Tamburini, Giovanni; Lami, Francesco; Marini, Lorenzo Figshare 2017. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3827959.v2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for yield could decrease meat and oil content.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome: meat and oil contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“but would decrease meat and oil content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1926

t0
“Peanut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113

Title

Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations for Yield and Quality Traits of Advanced Generations in a Cross of Peanut1

Hee Yang Chiow; J. C. Wynne Peanut Science 1983. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-10-1-5

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Progenies varied substantially for yield, seed weight, meat and protein content.
Observation Progenies varied less for fruit length, fruit weight, oil content and maturity index.
Observation Heritability was highest for yield, meat and protein content.
Observation Heritability was intermediate for fruit length, fruit weight and seed weight.
Observation Heritability was lowest for oil content and maturity index.
Observation Genotypic correlations were generally higher than phenotypic correlations.
Association Maturity index showed low phenotypic correlations with yield and yield components.
Association Fruit size was highly correlated with seed weight.
Association Fruit size and seed weight were significantly correlated with yield.
Association Protein content and yield correlations were low.
Association Oil content was negatively correlated with yield.
Recommendation Selecting yield components was less effective than selecting yield directly.
Recommendation Selection for yield could increase protein content and fruit and seed traits.
Observation Transgressive segregation occurred across all studied traits.
Observation Progeny trait means were closer to the Spanish than the Virginia parent.
Observation Some progeny combined early maturity, high yield and large fruit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) did not significantly decrease rice yield compared with conventional urea (FP).

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: HNe0
Outcome: rice yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: FPe0

Verbatim

e0
“As compared with FP, HN did not decrease rice yield significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–435

Title

[Effects of seeding-box total fertilization on rice yield and nitrogen loss].

Ru-Liang Liu; You-Hong Li; Ai-Ping Zhang; et al. PubMed 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Medium-rate controlled-release urea (MN) increased the two-year average nitrogen use efficiency of rice by 26.2% compared with FP.
Intervention effect High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) increased the two-year average nitrogen use efficiency of rice by 20.7% compared with FP.
Intervention effect Total N concentration in surface water peaked 7-9 days after urea application in MN and HN, versus 1-3 days in FP.
Intervention effect Total N concentration in surface water in MN and HN was significantly lower than in FP throughout the rice growth period.
Intervention effect Nitrogen leaching loss occurred mainly at tillering stage in FP but was delayed to the tillering-flowering stage in MN and HN.
Observation In all treatments NO3(-)-N loss accounted for 59.7%-64.2% of the total N loss.
Intervention effect HN decreased total N leaching loss by 51.8% compared with FP.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease grain yield.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment: delayed autumn ploughinge0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Because delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease the grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–967

e1
“grain yield of spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–656

Title

The effect of incorporation time of different crops on the residual effect on spring cereals

H. KÄNKÄNEN; A. KANGAS; T. MELA Agricultural and Food Science 1999. doi:10.23986/afsci.5629

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Barley grain yield after legumes was similar to yield after barley despite 40 kg ha-1 less N fertilization.
Intervention effect Autumn ploughing gave good barley yield more reliably than spring incorporation.
Recommendation The authors recommend delayed autumn ploughing for its potential to reduce nitrogen leaching.
Recommendation Spring ploughing could be used except on clay soils.
Intervention effect Reduced tillage spring incorporation of ryegrass often decreased barley yield.
Intervention effect Reduced tillage spring incorporation of red clover often decreased barley yield.
Intervention effect Incorporation timing had no consistent effect on oats grain yield in year three.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics