Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

16,586 matchesgrouped into 9,146 categories

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 2,650 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 19 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: L550e0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 47.45 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“47.45 per cent in L550”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–480

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: BG261e0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 52.90 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“52.90 per cent in BG261”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–558

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: Radheye0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Value: 80.31 per cente0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“80.31 per cent in Radhey”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–637

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49

e1
“decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456

Title

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization

S.K. Misra Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2001

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent.
Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent.
Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent.
Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent.

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 24-132%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentratione0
Direction: Increasede0
Value: 3.7-37%e0
Comparator: P45e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: P90e0
Outcome: Grain-Cd concentratione0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 34%e0
Comparator: P0e0

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133

e0
“Grain-Cd concentration decreased at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966

Title

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield

Zia-ul-Hassan; S. Khokhar; I. Rajpar; et al. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2016. doi:10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.48

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%.
Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%.
Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30.
Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%.

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

Show all 20 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 23.19%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 7.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: average grain-filling rate (AGFR)e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 13.97%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimuline0
Outcome: number of weedse0
Direction: no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: PGR Zeastimuline4
Outcome: above-ground air-dry mass of weed plantse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“only a slight decrease in the above-ground air-dry mass of weed plants was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1848

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,0% at the second survey.

Taxon: CORNZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: Stellar herbicidee3
Outcome: weed numberse0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 97,0%e0
Qualifier: seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in weed numbers was 93,5% during the first survey, 97,0% during the second and 97,9% during the third.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1619

t0
“CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93

t1
“HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–93

e1
“the length of maize cobs increased from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm in the version of weed control by Laudis (0,5 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2257

e2
“which gave a grain yield increase of 2,9 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2611–2656

e3
“Stellar herbicide (1,1 l/ha) - for 3,1 t/ha.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2662–2706

e4
“where herbicides were applied together with PGR Zeastimulin, no decrease in the number of weeds was observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758

Title

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN

Svitlana Okrushko Agriculture and Forestry 2020. doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-2-9

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed numbers by 89,7% versus control after treatment.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed quantity by 94,7% at harvest.
Intervention effect Laudis reduced weed mass by 655 g/m2 at harvest.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 93,5% at the first survey.
Intervention effect Stellar reduced weed numbers by 97,9% at the third survey.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides did not decrease weed number.
Intervention effect Adding Zeastimulin to herbicides slightly decreased dry weed biomass.
Intervention effect Maize height was 17,3% higher on herbicidal variant 2 than control.
Intervention effect Maize height was 19,8% higher on herbicidal variant 4 than control.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin further increased maize height by 2 cm.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 17,9 cm to 18,6 cm with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased cob length from 18,3 cm to 19,4 cm with Stellar.
Intervention effect Weed reduction and Zeastimulin increased maize cob diameter.
Intervention effect Laudis increased maize grain yield by 2,9 t/ha.
Intervention effect Stellar increased maize grain yield by 3,1 t/ha.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,5% with Laudis.
Intervention effect Zeastimulin increased yield by 9,2% with Stellar.

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas 18

Show all 18 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: RF40e4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: increasede4
Value: 13.9%e4
Comparator: RF60e4

Verbatim

e4
“Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.

Taxon: Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: RF80e4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: increasede4
Value: 17.2%e4
Comparator: RF60e4

Verbatim

e4
“Among the three RF treatments, RF40 and RF80 significantly increased the yield by 13.9% and 17.2%, respectively, compared with RF60”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1315

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In a wet year, FP significantly increased winter wheat yield by 43.6% compared with RF.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment: FPe3
Outcome: winter wheat yielde3
Direction: increasede3
Value: 43.6%e3
Comparator: RFe3
Setting: wet year (2017–2018)e3

Verbatim

e3
“In a wet year (2017–2018), FP significantly increased the winter wheat yield (43.6%) compared with RF, while the opposite was the case in a normal year (2018–2019)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182

t0
“Increase Winter Wheat Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–97

Title

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas

Xiaoli Liu; Yandong Wang; Xiaolong Ren; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081815

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting raised furrow soil temperature compared with flat planting.
Intervention effect Ridge-furrow planting promoted soil moisture in the furrows during the vegetative period compared with flat planting.
Association Soil temperature of the furrows slightly increased with furrow width.
Association Soil moisture obviously decreased under the three RF practices.
Intervention effect In a normal year, RF gave higher winter wheat yield than FP, the opposite of the wet year.
Intervention effect RF40 significantly increased yield by 13.9% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect RF80 significantly increased yield by 17.2% compared with RF60.
Intervention effect All RF treatments increased the flux of N2O and CO2 emissions compared with FP.
Intervention effect All RF treatments reduced CH4 absorption compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 99.6% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 53.4% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GWP by 31.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:40 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 55.8% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:60 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 45.3% compared with FP.
Intervention effect RF with 40:80 cm ridge-furrow ratio increased GHGI by 0.7% compared with FP.
Recommendation Conventional flat planting in wet years is recommended to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.
Recommendation A ridge-furrow ratio of 40:71 cm is recommended in normal years to reduce GHG emissions while sustaining winter wheat productivity.

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 16

Show all 16 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.

Taxon: timothyPhleum pratensee0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.74e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.
Observation Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.

Taxon: tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.84e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.
Observation Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reed canarygrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.85% per day during June.

Taxon: reed canarygrasse0
Outcome: IVDMDe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.85e0
Qualifier: % per daye0

Verbatim

e0
“In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) values ranged from above 80% down to 45%, with an average rate of decrease during June of 0.74, 0.84, 0.85 and 0.45% per day in timothy, tall fescue, reed canarygrass and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–600

Title

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS

W. MASON; L. LACHANCE Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1983. doi:10.4141/cjps83-085

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Timothy IVDMD decreased on average by 0.74% per day during June.
Observation Tall fescue IVDMD decreased on average by 0.84% per day during June.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass IVDMD decreased on average by 0.45% per day during June.
Observation Timothy crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.47% per day.
Observation Tall fescue crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.40% per day.
Observation Reed canarygrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.39% per day.
Observation Kentucky bluegrass crude protein in first-cut forage decreased by 0.28% per day.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 63 to 59% IVDMD.
Observation Regrowth forage in midsummer and fall harvests averaged 16 to 20% CP.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut continued to increase total annual dry matter yield, except in reed canarygrass.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut significantly increased total IVDMD yield until flowering.
Intervention effect Delaying the initial cut decreased total CP yield from stem elongation onwards.
Observation Reed canarygrass reached its optimum CP yield at early heading.
Observation Reed canarygrass had significant increases in IVDMD yield until the flowering stage.
Intervention effect Harvesting all forages at the stem elongation stage substantially reduced yield of DM, IVDMD and CP.
Observation Most of the DM was obtained in the initial harvest.
Observation Almost half of the total CP was obtained in the final harvest.

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions. 16

Show all 16 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon: crope0
Treatment: strip-tillage (ST)e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 20%e0
Comparator: conventional tillage (CT)e0

Verbatim

e0
“Regarding crop yield, strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Observation SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon: crope0
Treatment: no-tillage (NT)e0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 15%e0
Comparator: conventional tillage (CT)e0

Verbatim

e0
“Regarding crop yield, strip-tillage (ST) and no-tillage (NT) got a decrease of 20% and 15% compared to conventional tillage (CT).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2441

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Observation SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

SALUS projected soil organic carbon stock loss across treatments.

Taxon: crope1
Outcome: soil organic carbon (SOC) stocke0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“SALUS simulation shown a general trend among the treatments characterized by a decrease in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3513–3636

e1
“historical crop-yield data”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1655

Title

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions.

Donato Cillis Padua@research (University of Padova) 2018

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource Four homogeneous management zones were defined.
Intervention effect Strip tillage reduced crop yield by 20% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage reduced crop yield by 15% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture increased total crop yield by over 10% in conservation tillage.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage with precision agriculture had 2% higher net energy than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced strip tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture enhanced no tillage net energy by almost 20% versus uniform application.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with minimum tillage increased energy efficiency 10% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with no tillage increased energy efficiency 2% over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture with strip tillage increased energy efficiency 15% versus fixed input rates.
Intervention effect Minimum tillage simulated 17% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage simulated 63% less soil organic carbon loss than conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage reduced farming operation carbon emissions.
Intervention effect Precision agriculture optimized fossil fuel and fertilizer use.
Intervention effect No tillage with precision agriculture reduced total CO2 by 56% versus conventional tillage.

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 1 662.0 kg/hae0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI before silkinge0
Direction: limitede0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI after silking.

Taxon: Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material: Zhendan958e1
Treatment: subsoiling at jointing stagee0
Outcome: LAI after silkinge0
Direction: slowe0
Comparator: non-subsoilinge0

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–99

e0
“compared with non-subsoiling,subsoiling at jointing stage achieved the following characters: plant height and ear height decreased by 17.3 cm and 9.0 cm,stem diameter decreased by 2.7 mm,and one leaf less;the increase of LAI before silking was limited,while decrease of LAI after silking was slow;stomatal conductance,intercellular CO2 concentration,transpiration rate,net photosynthetic rate of ear leaves decreased 38%…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–1013

e1
“Zhendan958 was applied in the field experiment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47

Title

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize

Dongxing Zhang Yumi kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained plant height by 17.3 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained ear height by 9.0 cm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stem diameter by 2.7 mm.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained leaf by one leaf.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained LAI before silking.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained stomatal conductance by 38%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained intercellular CO2 concentration by 25.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained transpiration rate by 42.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained net photosynthetic rate by 2.0%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 1 519.5 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained dry matter production by 168.8 kg/ha.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain number by 100.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained economic index by 7 percentage.
Intervention effect Subsoiling at jointing reduced or constrained grain yield by 1 662.0 kg/ha.
Intervention effect The two nitrogen regimes did not differ significantly for the studied outcomes.
Association No subsoiling by nitrogen regime interaction was observed.
Recommendation The authors conclude that jointing-stage subsoiling is unsuitable.

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: soil bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.63 %e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: phosphoruse0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 8.73%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration method increased potassium by 5.22% versus the control.

Taxon: cassavaManihot esculentat0
Treatment: integration methode0
Outcome: potassiume0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 5.22%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“cassava”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

e0
“Compared with the control,integration method brought about the increase of 11.14%,15.06%,12.44%,21.43%,32.39%,23.04% and 7697.90 yuan/ha on cassava stem diameter,tuberous root diameter,tuberous root length,tuberous root number per plant,tuberous root weight per plant,fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare and benefit,increase of 8.84%,8.73%,5.22%,7.56%,3.08%,15.51% and 9.86% on available nitrogen,phosphorus,potass…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–1258

Title

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil

HE Yong-qu Nanfang nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect The integration method increased cassava stem diameter by 11.14% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root diameter by 15.06% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root length by 12.44% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root number per plant by 21.43% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased tuberous root weight per plant by 32.39% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased fresh weight of tuberous root per hectare by 23.04% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased benefit by 7697.90 yuan/ha versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased available nitrogen by 8.84% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased phosphorus by 8.73% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased organic matter by 7.56% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased pH by 3.08% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased moisture content by 15.51% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method increased total porosity by 9.86% versus the control.
Intervention effect The integration method decreased soil bulk density by 5.63 % versus the control.
Recommendation The authors recommend the integrated fertilization and tillage method for cassava production.

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15

Show all 15 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: days of germinatione0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 7.00e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield plant-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 227.99 ge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield plant-1 (227.99 g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1147

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield bed-1, 15.04 kg, versus control.

Taxon: French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment: 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYMe0
Outcome: fresh pod yield bed-1e1
Direction: higheste2
Value: 15.04 kge1
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

t0
“French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

e0
“application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost + FYM significantly decrease the days of germination (7.00), growth, yield and quality increased significantly over control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–814

e1
“fresh pod yield bed-1 (15.04 kg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1181

e2
“highest plant height”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–839

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun

Chandan Kumar; J.K. Meena; C.S. Pandey; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.227

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Integrated nutrients significantly reduced days of germination to 7.00 versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 31.12 cm at flowering stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest plant height, 33.08 cm at maturity stage, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of primary branches plant-1, 6.33, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest days to 50% germination, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of plants bed-1, 66.00, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod length, 15.06 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest pod width, 0.90 cm, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest number of pods plant-1, 38.66, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest average pod weight, 5.79 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield plant-1, 227.99 g, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest fresh pod yield hectare-1, 37.60 t, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest dry matter content, 9.67%, versus control.
Intervention effect Integrated nutrients produced the highest protein content, 6.76%, versus control.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrated organic and inorganic nutrient sources to improve growth, yield and quality.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Salt Tolerance of Different Cultivars of Chickpea as Influenced by Zinc Fertilization 20

ACC-Deaminase, Phosphate-Solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens Increase Phosphorus and Decrease Cadmium Concentration to Enhance Wheat Yield 20

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 20

ESTIMATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF HERBICIDES AND PGR OF ZEASTIMULIN ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF CORN 18

Optimized Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Winter Wheat Yield in Dry Semi-Humid Areas 18

EFFECTS OF INITIAL HARVEST DATE ON DRY MATTER YIELD, IN VITRO DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILITY AND PROTEIN IN TIMOTHY, TALL FESCUE, REED CANARYGRASS AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 16

Introducing innovative precision farming techniques in agriculture to decrease carbon emissions. 16

Effects of Subsoiling at Jointing Stage on Dry Matter Production and Photosynthesis of Summer Maize 15

Effects of integrated fertilization and tillage technologies on cassava yield and physical and chemical properties of soil 15

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) c.v. Pant Anupama under Valley Conditions of Dehradun 15