View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
Treatmentshading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Selection for nematode resistance did not decrease sugar beet root yield .
TreatmentSelection for resistance to nematode e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Selection for resistance to nematode did not decrease root yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–249 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Slightly damaged wheat fields had no actual yield decrease .
Settingslightly damaged field e0 Verbatim
e0 “Actual decrease in yield was not found in the slightly damaged field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1862 t0 “wheat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease at flower organ differentiation was hardly recognized.
Organ / stageflower organ e1 Directionhardly recognized e0 Verbatim
e0 “But the yield decrease was hardly recognized, because of the few abnormality in ears and the good fertility in seeds. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–569 t0 “naked barley "Hashirihadaka" caused by the unusual low temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–105 e1 “Damages of plants at the differentiation stage of flower organ. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher insecticide rates may decrease soybean yield .
Treatmenthigher rates of application e0 Qualifiermay cause foliage injury e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 e0 “higher rates of application may cause foliage injury to the extent of decreasing yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–260 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield per plant declined with the decrease in fertile tiller numbers.
Organ / stagefertile tiller numbers e6 OutcomeSeed yield per plant e6 Verbatim
e0 “spaced plants of S.48 timothy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–68 e6 “Seed yield per plant declined with the decrease in fertile tiller numbers, but after the early cuts some compensation by production of slightly more seed per ear was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–942 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Night temperature 2°C below natural from the maximum stage did not promote Akiochi or decrease grain yield .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 e0 “but 2°C 1ower plots did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–350 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization tended to decrease alfalfa yield s.
TreatmentNitrogen fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Nitrogen fertilization tended to decrease yield s and stands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–298 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–99 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilization tended to decrease alfalfa stand persistence.
TreatmentNitrogen fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Nitrogen fertilization tended to decrease yield s and stands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–298 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–99 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Omitting potassium significantly decrease d potato yield in 1952.
Treatmentelimination of potassium e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In 1952 the elimination of potassium did cause a significant decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1007 t0 “Potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.