View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying against late blight did not significantly decrease yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not significantly decrease neither occurrence of late blight or the yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–528 t0 “BIOPOTATOES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Aster Yellows did not significantly decrease root yield or phytochemical content in Echinacea .
Aster Yellows e0 pathogen root yield phenolic or phytochemical content e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “While Aster Yellows were prevalent in Echinacea in Saskatchewan, this disease did not significantly decrease root yield phenolic or phytochemical content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1393 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decision support systems gave no significant yield decrease compared with the stage-oriented standard system
no significant decrease e0 stage-oriented standard system e0 Verbatim
t0 “Fungicides in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–84 e0 “Compared to a stage-oriented standard system, no significant decrease in yield was observed in both cultivars, despite up to a 50% reduction in fungicide use through the use of DSSs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1228 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lee 74 soybean had a nonsignificant numerical yield decrease with higher BPMV infection.
Verbatim
e0 “There was a numerical reduction in yield as BPMV infection levels increased with ‘Lee 74’ variety soybean, but the differences were not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–496 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe stress, bacteroid proline catabolism had no significant effect on the drought-related seed yield decrease .
drought imposed decrease in seed yield e0 no significant effect e0 when stress was severe e0 Verbatim
e0 “when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1451 e1 “When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1173 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing 0.5% CMV-infected seed did not significantly decrease lupin grain yield .
narrow‐leafed lupins e0 sowing 0.5% infected seed e3 did not significantly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “narrow‐leafed lupins ( Lupinus angustifolius ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–87 e1 “sowing seed with 5% and 0.5% cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–195 e3 “The spread of CMV infection resulting from sowing 0.5% infected seed did not significantly decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–881 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 50% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease .
reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% e0 yield of peppers e0 did not cause a statistically significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397 t0 “Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 75% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease .
reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% e0 yield of peppers e0 did not cause a statistically significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397 t0 “Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum tuberosumt0
Phytophthora infestans
Vitis
Echinacea
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
Capsicum annuum