View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
In other varieties, a one month yield increase was offset by a decrease in another month.
Verbatim
e0 “in others they occurred in 1 month and were offset by a yield decrease in another ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–796 e1 “54 varieties of ryegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–204 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
bacterial inoculation e0 bacterial e0 symbiont 50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Laurier had the highest disease severity but the smallest grain yield and grain weight decrease .
Disease severity e0 Verbatim
t0 “ORGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 e0 “Disease severity was highest on Laurier which suffered the least decrease in grain yield and grain weight compared to the checks. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–657 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield .
sicklepod e0 weed addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac e0 potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Increased water-soluble carbon reserves could increase or decrease disease tolerance.
water-soluble carbon e1 increase or decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increased WSC accumulation can either increase or decrease tolerance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1699 e1 “water-soluble carbon (WSC) reserves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–846 t0 “Wheat to Foliar Diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–76 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Extreme amounts of floral pigment do not further increase, and sometimes decrease , flower color contrast.
extreme amounts of pigment e2 flower’s color contrast e2 do not further increase e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Floral pigments are a core component of flower colors, but how much pigment a flower should have to yield a strong visual signal to pollinators is unknown ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–154 e2 “Low pigment amounts yield pale colors, intermediate amounts yield high contrast, and extreme amounts of pigment do not further increase, and sometimes even decrease , a flower’s color contrast ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–689 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result mixed significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field inoculant combinations could increase or decrease mycorrhizal colonization.
mycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculants in combination or alone e0 mycorrhizal e0 symbiont rhizobial e0 symbiont root mycorrhizal colonization e0 increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the effects of mycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculants in combination or alone were highly context-specific and may induce either a significant increase or decrease in root mycorrhizal colonization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1229 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result mixed significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field inoculants could increase or decrease nodule formation.
mycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculants in combination or alone e0 rhizobial e0 symbiont mycorrhizal e0 symbiont nodule formation e0 increase or decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the effects of mycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculants in combination or alone were highly context-specific and may induce either a significant increase or decrease in root mycorrhizal colonization and nodule formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1250 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Similarly treated plants had the same leaf-area reduction across two years but a much greater net-assimilation decrease in the second year.
reduction of leaf area e0 but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second e0 Verbatim
e0 “similarly treated plants showed the same reduction of leaf area in two successive years, but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1193 e1 “Infection with beet yellows virus depressed the dry‐matter yield of sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Beet yellows infection depressed sugar-beet dry-matter yield by decreasing leaf area and net assimilation rate, without reducing leaf number. Intervention effect End-of-June yellows infection yellowed 30‐50% of leaf area from mid-August; later infection caused less yellowing. Mechanism Yellowing nearly explained the decrease in net assimilation if yellowed leaf parts do not photosynthesize, although similar carbohydrate fluctuations suggest photosynthesis may be little slowed and respiration may instead increase. Intervention effect Late-sown infected plants had a greater leaf-area reduction but a smaller net-assimilation reduction than early-sown plants. Intervention effect Yellows dry-matter losses were mostly in roots, petiole dry weight also decreased, and leaf-lamina dry weight was little affected. Intervention effect Yellows greatly increased reducing sugars and caused smaller sucrose and starch increases in leaf laminae, beginning with etch symptoms; starch effects peaked then while sugar effects increased with yellowing. Intervention effect Yellows reduced leaf-lamina water content, nitrogen content and arealweight ratio. Mechanism The carbohydrate rise could explain the nitrogen-content change but not the other leaf-lamina changes. Intervention effect Yellows did not affect petiole and root water content but increased their nitrogen content. Mechanism Yellows reduced root sucrose content, while decreased root weight accounted for most sugar-yield loss. Intervention effect Beet mosaic infection decreased sugar-beet dry weight only with nitrogenous fertilizer, through reduced leaf area and net assimilation. Intervention effect Mosaic depressed dry weights of leaf lamina, petiole and root. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect leaf-lamina carbohydrate content, water content or arealweight ratio. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect petiole and root water content. Intervention effect Mosaic increased nitrogen content throughout plants receiving no nitrogenous fertilizer, but not in nitrogen-treated plants. Intervention effect Mosaic slightly increased root sucrose content. Intervention effect End-of-June mosaic infection caused a 20 yo sugar-yield loss in nitrogen-fertilized plants. Intervention effect Yellows infection of similar plants at the same date reduced sugar yield by 50%. Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial and fungal counts rose then fell, peaking at R5.
number of bacteria and fungus e0 increase and then decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “number of bacteria and fungus showed increase and then decrease trend,and maximized at R5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–440 t0 “Effect of Nitrogen Amount on Rhizosphere Soil Microorganisms and Yield of Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lolium
Zea mays
Gossypium hirsutum
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris