View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava root yield by up to 87%.
root and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mite damage was shown to decrease cassava stake yield by up to 82%.
root and stake yield e1 Verbatim
t0 “The cassava mites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 e1 “These arthropods cause three patterns of damage and have been shown to cause a decrease in root and stake yield of up to 87% and 82% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–333 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease Spanish peanut yield .
Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks e1 Horsenettle e1 weed did not decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease the yield of Spanish peanuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.
intercropping with cowpea e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 t0 “maize ( Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
applying mycorrhizal fungi e0 mycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease was more significant when weed was in rows of maize, in both seasons.
weed in rows of maize e3 in both seasons e3 Verbatim
e3 “Yield was significantly affected by the weed position in both seasons and the decrease was more significant in variants with weed in rows of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–977 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield decrease depended on weather, weed infestation and stem base rot.
winter wheat yield e0 weed infestation e0 weather conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in winter wheat yield depended on weather conditions, weed infestation and the occurrence of stem base rot (Fusarium spp.). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–799 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated yield decrease from pest defoliation was less than 1%.
Verbatim
e0 “The overall decrease in yield is estimated to be less than 1% by defoliation due to this pest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–652 e2 “Acherontia lachesis (F.)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–64 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Yangambi km5 showed no yield decrease with nematodes at either harvest.
presence of nematodes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Yangambi km5 showed no decrease in LAI and yield in the presence of nematodes at both harvests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1472 e1 “a banana (Musa spp.) field trial ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–143 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Manihot esculentat0
Vitis.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Arachis hypogaea var. vulgaris
Zea mays
Vigna unguiculata
Helianthus annuus
Triticum aestivum
Fusarium
Nicotiana tabacum
Acherontia lachesis
Musa