Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafhopper numbers exceeding the threshold decrease grain yield and can cause plant loss.

Interactor
phytophagese0pest
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The number of phytophages which exceeds the ETH leads to decrease in grain yield and even to loss of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2008

Title

Seasonal dynamics of cereal leafhopper population density on winter wheat in Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

G. V. Mieliukhina Myronivka Bulletin 2017. doi:10.31073/mvis201704-11

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average yield decrease rate of Codonopsis lanceolata was 10%.

Taxon
Codonopsis lanceolataCodonopsis lanceolatae0
Outcome
average yield decrease ratee1
Value
10%e1

Verbatim

e0

“damages on Codonopsis lanceolata Trautv at 116 fields of 15 major cultivation areas in Korea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–163
e1

“The average yield decrease rate was 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–713

Title

Occurrence of plant parasitic nematodes in Codonopsis lanceojata field and its damage by Meloidogyne hapia

Ju-Rak Lim; Chang-Yeon Hwang; Jong‐Yeon Hwang; et al. Korean journal of applied entomology 2005

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both infections tended to decrease yield.

Treatment
Infection by S. turgidiscabiese0
Interactor
S. turgidiscabiesStreptomyces turgidiscabiese0pathogen
Second interactor
S. scabiesStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Infection by S. turgidiscabies and S. scabies delayed emergence, had the tendency to decrease the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–949
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19

Title

Responses of potato cultivars to the common scab pathogens, Streptomyces scabies and S. turgidiscabies

L H HILTUNEN; A WECKMAN; A YLHÄINEN; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040083.x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soybean frequency tended to decrease yield.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
increase in frequency of soybean in the rotatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Severity of BSR tended to increase, and yield and seed weight of soybean tended to decrease with an increase in frequency of soybean in the rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1381
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81

Title

Tillage, Rotation Sequence, and Cultivar Influences on Brown Stem Rot and Soybean Yield

E. A. Adee; E. S. Oplinger; C. R. Grau jpa 1994. doi:10.2134/jpa1994.0341

Other claims from this paper (19)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each one percent higher virus incidence corresponded to a 55 or 72 kg/ha yield decrease.

Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
yield decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
55 or 72 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“for each 1% increase in virus incidence, there was a yield decrease of 55 or 72 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1959
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84

Title

Role of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment

Deborah J. Thackray; Laura T. Ward; Monica L. Thomas-Carroll; et al. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 2005. doi:10.1071/ar05048

Other claims from this paper (18)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for nematode resistance did not decrease sugar beet root yield.

Treatment
Selection for resistance to nematodee0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Selection for resistance to nematode did not decrease root yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–249

Title

Breeding Sugar Beets for Resistance to Nematodes1

R. E. Finkner; J. F. Swink Agronomy Journal 1956. doi:10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800090001x

Other claims from this paper (1)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection beginning at tillering or grain filling caused no observed yield loss or yield-component decrease.

Organ / stage
tillering or grain fillinge0
Treatment
infectione0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
yield loss or decrease in yield componentse0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No yield loss or decrease in yield components was observed when infection started at tillering or grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1618
e1

“Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) of rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57

Title

Effect of Sheath Blight on Yield in Tropical, Intensive Rice Production System

R. M. Cu Plant Disease 1996. doi:10.1094/pd-80-1103

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive dry matter gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass caused by weed competition.

Taxon
DL napiergrasse3
Treatment
setariae3
Outcome
yield decreasee3
Direction
compensatee3
Qualifier
coulde3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“additive DM gain from setaria could compensate the yield decrease in DL napiergrass and reduce herbicide cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135

Title

Effect of weed control management on herbage yield and quality in the established dwarf napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach).

Renny Fatmyah Utamy; Yasuyuki Ishii; Sachiko Idota; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation in the reproductive stage caused a greater decrease in soybean yield components.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee5
Treatment
defoliatione5
Outcome
yield componentse5
Direction
greater decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yield depends on photosynthesis generated by leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59
e5

“defoliation has a negative effect on all cultivars yield components with greater decrease when it occurs in the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1239

Title

Continuous Defoliation Stress in Vegetative and Reproductive Stages of Soybean Genotypes

Amilton Ferreira da Silva; Tuneo Sediyama; Francisco Charles do Silva; et al. Journal of Agronomy 2015. doi:10.3923/ja.2015.279.285

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytoplasma infection was accompanied by a large final yield decrease.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Interactor
phytoplasmaCandidatus Phytoplasmae0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“The phytoplasma infection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498
t0

“grapevine (Vitis vinifera)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130

Title

Effects of Bois noir on carbon assimilation, transpiration, stomatal conductance of leaves and yield of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cv. Chardonnay

Solomon T. Endeshaw; Sergio Murolo; Gianfranco Romanazzi; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01576.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.