View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At a 5% tolerance for yield decrease , the total period of interference prevention for weeds in lettuce was up to 21 days after transplanting.
total period of interference prevention (TPIP) e1 21 days after transplanting e1 tolerance of 5% for crop production decrease e1 Verbatim
e1 “Assuming a tolerance of 5% for crop production decrease , it was verified that the total period of interference prevention (TPIP) occurred up to 21 days after transplanting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–847 t0 “weed interference prevention in lettuce cv. Solaris ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–67 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tanggamus/Pangrango-78 was tolerant to whiteflies in the field, with a slight yield decrease of 19.85%.
Tanggamus/Pangrango- 78 e1 decreasing in yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “soybean genotypes in response to whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–125 e0 “slightly decreasing in yield of these three genotypes (17.33, 19.31, and 19.85%, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1607 e1 “Gema, IAC-100/Kaba-14, and Tanggamus/Pangrango- 78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1455 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced lupin seed yield per plant resulted from fewer pods per plant.
seed yield per plant e0 decrease in pod number per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in lupin seed yield per plant was due to a decrease in pod number per plant, not to a change in the number of seeds per pod or single seed weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1757 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall seed weight decrease per pod was small.
weight of seed per pod e0 Verbatim
e0 “the overall decrease in weight of seed per pod was small ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 t0 “oil-seed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin did not decrease pod rot incidence.
pod rot incidence e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “azoxystrobin increased yield in fields with little pod rot, apparently by controlling stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii ), but did not decrease pod rot incidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–840 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T. semipenetrans J2 soil population density did not increase or decrease consistently during the trial period.
population density of T. semipenetrans J2 e0 did not increase or decrease consistently e0 Verbatim
t0 “citrus nematode (Tylenchulus semipenetrans ) densities in soil on yield of grapevines (Vitis vinifera 'Shiraz') ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–120 e0 “the population density of T. semipenetrans J2 in soil did not increase or decrease consistently during the trial period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–608 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition reduced yacon yield .
weed competition e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–207 e1 “The weed competition resulted in a decrease in the yacon development (height, number of leaves, number of stems, leaf area), photosynthetic rate ( decrease d chlorophyll content A, B and total) and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1215 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A simulated biotrophic epidemic decrease d crop yield .
biotrophic pathogen e0 biotrophic pathogen e0 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Epidemics caused by a biotrophic pathogen reduce the green leaf area and diverts plant assimilates to the pathogen tissues, resulting in a decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1496 t0 “crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Radish residue addition significantly decrease d berry yield .
residue addition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–51 e0 “early flowering occurred in response to residue addition, suggesting a plant stress-response and there was a significant decrease in berry yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–591 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The disease decrease s yield and ultimately causes tree death.
Verbatim
e0 “which leads to a significant decrease in yield , and after a while the energy of the plants is depleted, they gradually dry out and eventually die ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1140 t0 “cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lactuca sativa
Glycine max
Bemisia tabaci
Lupinus_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Arachis hypogaea
Vitis vinifera_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria