View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield can fall by up to 50% in some years.
Verbatim
e0 “in some years the yield can decrease up to 50%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–860 t0 “tomato crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Stem blight causes lodging and death of plants, resulting in yield decrease or no-harvest.
InteractorCylindrosporium eleocharidis e0 pathogen Outcomelodging and dead of plants e2 Verbatim
e0 “Stem blight of Chinese water chestnut is also called for Chinese water chestnut blast infected by Cylindrosporium eleocharidis Lentz of Cylindrosporium,Melanconiales of Imperfect fungi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–184 e2 “It causes lodging and dead of plants,resulting in yield decrease or no-harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–263 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
MYMV susceptible progenies had a 7.4 to 35.0 percent decrease in pod length.
Value7.4 to 35.0 percent e0 Verbatim
t0 “mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–45 t1 “mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–116 e0 “7.4 to 35.0 percent decrease in pod length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–383 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Increased water-soluble carbon reserves could increase or decrease disease tolerance.
Compoundwater-soluble carbon e1 Directionincrease or decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increased WSC accumulation can either increase or decrease tolerance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1699 e1 “water-soluble carbon (WSC) reserves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–846 t0 “Wheat to Foliar Diseases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–76 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield loss mainly resulted from smaller bulbs.
Qualifierdecrease in bulb size e0 Verbatim
e0 “Loss of yield was mainly the result of decrease in bulb size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813 t0 “Bulb Onions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection decrease d structural components and yield .
Outcomestructural components and yield e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Triticum aestivum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 e0 “caused a decrease in the structural components and yield of the product ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1243 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cs infestation reduced potato yield in most cases.
Verbatim
e0 “In most cases, potato infestation by Cs caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1561 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe disease on Bianca lowered yield by 48.6%.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Strong development on an interspecific hybrid (‘Bianca’ variety) led to the yield decrease by 48.6 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–523 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ungulate foraging did not significantly decrease winter wheat grain yield .
Treatmentbig game grazing e0 Interactorungulate e2 herbivore Directiondid not significantly decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “The effects of big game grazing of winter wheat on grain yield were studied during 12 trials in northern Utah between 1990-92 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 e1 “plots protected and variously grazed by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus ), pronghorn (Antilocapra americana ) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–345 e2 “Results indicated that ungulate foraging in these trials did not significantly decrease grain yield s despite high utilization percentages on wheat leaves in fall and early spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–830 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d yield per plants by 89.04–99.89%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomeyield per plants e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “89.04–99.89% decrease in yield per plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1193 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.