View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Double inoculation with some bacteria species and a mycorrhizal fungus can decrease plant yield .
Double inoculation with the some species of bacteria and the mycorrhizal fungus e3 mycorrhizal fungus e3 symbiont some species of bacteria e3 other yielding the plants e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the roots of vascular plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 e3 “Double inoculation with the some species of bacteria and the mycorrhizal fungus can cause a decrease in the yield ing the plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1425 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa diseases reduce forage yield , quality and stand persistence.
forage yield, reduce forage quality, and decrease stand persistence e0 Verbatim
e0 “Alfalfa diseases can reduce forage yield , reduce forage quality, and decrease stand persistence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–168 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Velvet bean interference decrease d sugarcane yield by 50%.
Velvet bean interference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Velvet bean interference caused a 50% decrease in sugarcane yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1037 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen infection greatly reduced strawberry yield .
infection with pathogens e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “infection with pathogens led to highly decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–365 t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–54 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection of six soyabean cultivars with PStV caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar.
6 soyabean cultivars e5 peanut stripe potyvirus e0 pathogen plant height, seed or seed yield e5 no significant decrease e5 for any cultivar e5 field tests at Byron, Georgia, USA e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spread of peanut stripe potyvirus (PStV) from groundnut to soyabean and the yield effects on soyabean were determined in field tests at Byron, Georgia, USA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 e5 “Infection of 6 soyabean cultivars caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–730 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
On Clansthal series soils, the response to Temik appeared to decrease slightly as rainfall increased.
decrease slightly e5 Clansthal series soils e5 Verbatim
t0 “yield response of sugarcane to Temik ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–109 e5 “but in Clansthal series soils, the response appeared to decrease slightly as the rainfall increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–729 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield loss of oilseed rape was stated to decrease gradually as Conyza canadensis density increased.
Verbatim
e0 “with the interference of Conyza canadensis ,the pod number,seed number, yield and yield loss of oilseed rape decrease d gradually as the weed density increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–335 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed interference during the decrease of stored water and critical water deficit periods significantly affected physiological variables, yield and total solids of Persian lime fruits.
Weed interference during the decrease of stored water and critical water deficit periods e1 physiological variables, yield and total solids contents of the fruits e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the physiology, yield and quality of Persian lime fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–329 e1 “Weed interference during the decrease of stored water and critical water deficit periods affected significantly the physiological variables, yield and total solids contents of the fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–809 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in dicot intensity was associated with a decrease in rice grain yield of 1.64 q ha-1.
rice grain yield e6 Verbatim
t0 “aromatic rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Cv. Pusa Basmati 1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–114 e6 “The unit increase in intensity of monocots, dicots and weed dry weight causes decrease in rice grain yield by 2.18, 1.64 and 2.85 q ha-1 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1069 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each quarter of trunk circumference that was galled was associated with a 12% decrease in cumulative walnut nut yield over the first 4 years of production.
quarter of trunk circumference that was galled e6 cumulative nut yield e6 over the first 4 years of production e6 Verbatim
t0 “Crown gall can spread between walnut trees in nurseries and reduce future yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 e6 “For every quarter of trunk circumference that was galled, there was a 12% decrease in cumulative nut yield over the first 4 years of production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–894 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Medicago sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Erigeron canadensis.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Citrus