Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at the 3rd-4th leaf stage (DF1) caused the most significant decrease in maize dry matter yield, in spring sowing, relative to no defoliation.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: DF1e1
Outcome: dry matter (DM) yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Comparator: no defoliatione2
Setting: spring sowinge1

Verbatim

e0
“forage quality in maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–176

e1
“the most significant decrease in dry matter (DM) yield occurred in DF1 during spring sowing, while in summer sowing, the largest reduction was in DF3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–632

e2
“compared with no defoliation (control)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–463

Title

Effect of Defoliation on Growth, Yield and Forage Quality in Maize, as a Simulation of the Impact of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)

Kouki Tashiro; Midori Ishitani; Saaya Murai; et al. AgriEngineering 2024. doi:10.3390/agriengineering6020107

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.

Taxon: sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment: reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50%e0
Interactor: AMFe0symbiont
Outcome: yield of pepperse0
Direction: did not cause a statistically significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397

t0
“Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149

Title

The Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi and Various Mineral Fertilizer Levels on the Growth, Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Jolanta Franczuk; Michał Tartanus; Robert Rosa; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13040857

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect AMF root inoculation produced high yields of good quality.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application increased pepper yield.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application improved biometric traits.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application produced the thickest fruit pericarp.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application produced the largest fruit mass.
Intervention effect A 75% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Fertilizer dose reduction with AMF did not worsen plant and fruit biometrics.
Intervention effect Fertilizer dose reduction with AMF did not reduce fruit biological value.
Intervention effect With fertilizer reduced by 50%, AMF maintained similar fruit phosphorus amounts.
Intervention effect With fertilizer reduced by 75%, AMF maintained similar fruit phosphorus amounts.
Intervention effect A 50% dressing dose with mycorrhiza significantly increased potassium, calcium, and magnesium content.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal application at transplanting significantly increased fruit sodium.
Recommendation The authors recommend applying mycorrhizal fungi to pepper roots during seedling production.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For the same weed amount, yield decrease was 21% in the M vaginalis-E. glabrescens-Fimbristylis littoralis-S. maritimus community.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: same amount of weedse7
Interactor: M vaginalise7weed
Second interactor: E. glabrescensEchinochloa glabrescense7weed
Outcome: yield decreasee7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 21%e7
Qualifier: Fimbristylis littoralis Gaud.-S. maritimus community typee7

Verbatim

t0
“transplanted lowland rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52

e7
“The yield decrease for the same amount of weeds was 10% for the E. glabrescens community, 15% for the M vaginalis community and the M vaginalis-Scirpus supinus L. community and 21% for the M vaginalis-E. glabrescens-Fimbristylis littoralis Gaud.-S. maritimus community type”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1352

Title

Types of weed community in transplanted lowland rice and relationship between yield and weed weight in weed communities

Seung‐Chul Kim; K. Moody The Korean Journal of Crop Science 1980

Other claims from this paper (14)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative decrease in maximum root capacitance caused by pea or drought was proportional to shoot mass or grain yield change.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: pea or droughte0
Interactor: peaLathyrus oleraceuse0other
Outcome: maximum CRe0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The relative decrease caused by pea or drought in the maximum CR was proportional to the rate of change in SDM or GY.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1041

e1
“winter wheat cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–228

Title

Electrical Capacitance versus Minirhizotron Technique: A Study of Root Dynamics in Wheat–Pea Intercrops

Imre Cseresnyés; Bettina Kelemen; Tünde Takács; et al. Plants 2021. doi:10.3390/plants10101991

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Root capacitance, length, and surface area showed similar seasonal peaks around flowering.
Intervention effect Pea intercropping reduced maximum wheat root capacitance, length, and surface area.
Intervention effect Drought significantly decreased wheat root capacitance.
Intervention effect Drought increased minirhizotron root size.
Intervention effect Pea intercropping reduced wheat chlorophyll content, shoot dry mass, and grain yield.
Intervention effect Drought reduced wheat chlorophyll content, shoot dry mass, and grain yield.
Method / resource Root capacitance and root surface area had significant linear correlations, with R2 of 0.77–0.97.
Method / resource Drought treatments had significantly smaller specific root capacitance per unit root surface area.
Method / resource Capacitance measurements tended to predict root function and effects on shoot production and yield.
Method / resource Using both in situ methods improves evaluation of root dynamics and plant responses.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor: sicklepode0weed
Outcome: addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobace0
Qualifier: potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340

Title

Effect of Pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) Growth and Weed Control

C. Dale Monks; Michael G. Patterson; John W. Wilcut; et al. Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00044821

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Cotton tolerated postemergence pyrithiobac.
Intervention effect Adding MSMA to pyrithiobac injured cotton similarly to MSMA alone.
Intervention effect The herbicide treatments did not alter height to node ratio, node production or square retention.
Intervention effect Cotton maturity under MSMA ranged from no effect to delay.
Intervention effect Cotton maturity under DSMA ranged from no effect to delay.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased Florida beggarweed control in 1995 but not 1994.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased common cocklebur control in 1995 but not 1994.
Intervention effect Adding DSMA increased sicklepod control across three Alabama site years.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in grain yield was smaller in the nodulating line T 202.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxt0
Material: T 202e0
Outcome: 子実収量e0
Direction: 小さかったe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0
“soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–34

e0
“子実収量は乾物生産量の減少によって低下したが, その程度もT 202で小さかった”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–316

Title

Excess moisture injury of soybeans cultivated in an upland field converted from paddy. IV. The significance of nodulation under excess moisture condition.

Hideki SUGIMOTO; Tooru SATOU Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1990. doi:10.1626/jcs.59.727

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield declined linearly with increasing defoliation.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: defoliation levele0
Outcome: soybean yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“As soybean defoliation level increased, a linear decrease in soybean yield was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1093

Title

Soybean response to weed interference and defoliation

Charles F. Grymes; James L. Griffin; David J. Boethel; et al. Weed Science 1999. doi:10.1017/s0043174500090706

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Johnsongrass height and dry weight were unaffected by soybean defoliation level or stage.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur height and dry weight were unaffected by soybean defoliation level or stage.
Intervention effect Hemp sesbania height and dry weight were unaffected by soybean defoliation level or stage.
Intervention effect Soybean height three weeks after R5 defoliation was unaffected by weeds, defoliation level or stage in both years.
Intervention effect Johnsongrass reduced soybean yield 30% in 1994.
Intervention effect Common cocklebur reduced soybean yield 15% in 1994.
Intervention effect Hemp sesbania reduced soybean yield 14% in 1994.
Intervention effect Johnsongrass reduced soybean yield 35% in 1995.
Intervention effect 33% defoliation reduced soybean yield 6% in 1994.
Intervention effect 66% defoliation reduced soybean yield 20% in 1994.
Intervention effect 33% defoliation reduced soybean yield 12% in 1995.
Intervention effect 66% defoliation reduced soybean yield 33% in 1995.
Intervention effect R5 defoliation gave 10% lower yield than R2 defoliation in one year.
Observation Weeds and soybean defoliation caused additive yield reductions.

Associationobservedreview summarynegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds can decrease cotton productivity by more than 30%.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Interactor: Weedse0weed
Outcome: cotton productivitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: more than 30%e0

Verbatim

e0
“Weeds can cause more than 30% decrease in cotton productivity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–359

Title

Weed flora, yield losses and weed control in cotton crop

Jabran, Khawar Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut) 2016. doi:10.5073/jka.2016.452.023

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 75% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.

Taxon: sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment: reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75%e0
Interactor: AMFe0symbiont
Outcome: yield of pepperse0
Direction: did not cause a statistically significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397

t0
“Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149

Title

The Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi and Various Mineral Fertilizer Levels on the Growth, Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Jolanta Franczuk; Michał Tartanus; Robert Rosa; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13040857

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect AMF root inoculation produced high yields of good quality.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application increased pepper yield.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application improved biometric traits.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application produced the thickest fruit pericarp.
Intervention effect Seedling stage mycorrhizal application produced the largest fruit mass.
Intervention effect A 50% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.
Intervention effect Fertilizer dose reduction with AMF did not worsen plant and fruit biometrics.
Intervention effect Fertilizer dose reduction with AMF did not reduce fruit biological value.
Intervention effect With fertilizer reduced by 50%, AMF maintained similar fruit phosphorus amounts.
Intervention effect With fertilizer reduced by 75%, AMF maintained similar fruit phosphorus amounts.
Intervention effect A 50% dressing dose with mycorrhiza significantly increased potassium, calcium, and magnesium content.
Intervention effect Mycorrhizal application at transplanting significantly increased fruit sodium.
Recommendation The authors recommend applying mycorrhizal fungi to pepper roots during seedling production.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatments are a possible way to decrease anthracnose symptoms and achieve greater yield in common bean.

Taxon: common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment: folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatmentse0
Outcome: anthracnose symptomse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The results of the present study support the novel possibility of using folpan foliar spray and Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatments to decrease anthracnose symptoms in common bean and consequently, achieve greater yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1702

Title

Field Management of Anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) in Common Bean through Fungicides and Bioagents

Mohammed Amin Advances in Crop Science and Technology 2014. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000124

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Anthracnose incidence, severity and infected pods per plant were highest in control plots compared with fungicide-sprayed and bioagent-treated plots.
Intervention effect The area under the disease progress curve was highest in control plots compared with fungicide-sprayed and bioagent-treated plots.
Intervention effect Mancozeb-sprayed plots had a lower percentage of infected pods per plant (55.0) than control plots (78.9).
Intervention effect Folpan foliar spray gave the highest yield (3.3 t/ha) compared with control plots.
Intervention effect Plots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens yielded 1.8 t/ha, higher than control plots.
Intervention effect Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment lowered relative yield loss to 46.3 compared with control (69.7).
Intervention effect Mancolaxyl foliar spray lowered relative yield loss to 22.8% compared with control (69.7).
Association Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment gave the highest rate of return (8,740).
Association Folpan foliar spray gave the highest net benefit value (43,154).

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics