View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Yield can decrease down to 80-98% in some cases, depending on weather and crop phytosanitary condition.
Verbatim
e1 “Depending on weather conditions and the phytosanitary condition of crops, the prevalence of diseases can reach 70-80% of the total plant population, and the yield can decrease in some cases down to 80-98% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–398 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. napus showed an apparent appreciable yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–785 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Halilbey had a 29.6% yield decrease with artificial infection.
artificially i nfected treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the artificially i nfected treatment cv. Halilbey, Edirne, Gala and Tu nca exhibited 29.6%, 14%, 13.5% and 5.1% yield decrease , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1085 t0 “rice cultivars resulting from rice white tip nematode Aphelenchoides besseyi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Gala had a 13.5% yield decrease with artificial infection.
artificially i nfected treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the artificially i nfected treatment cv. Halilbey, Edirne, Gala and Tu nca exhibited 29.6%, 14%, 13.5% and 5.1% yield decrease , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1085 t0 “rice cultivars resulting from rice white tip nematode Aphelenchoides besseyi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The disease decrease s peach fruit yield , quality and storability.
yield, a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits e0 Verbatim
e0 “This leads to a decrease in yield , a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–517 t0 “PEACH LEAF CURL OF PEACH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
In numerical simulations, an increase in the number of vectors around the field is associated with a decrease in tomato yield .
an increase in the number of vectors around the field e1 Verbatim
e1 “the outcomes indicate an increase in the number of vectors around the field with a decrease in tomato yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1637 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
bacterial inoculation e0 bacterial e0 symbiont 50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each galled quarter of trunk circumference corresponded to a 12% decrease in cumulative nut yield .
trunk circumference e0 cumulative nut yield e0 over the first 4 years of production e0 Verbatim
e0 “For every quarter of trunk circumference that was galled, there was a 12% decrease in cumulative nut yield over the first 4 years of production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–895 t0 “walnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Infected tolerant sugar beet cultivars had a 54% average decrease in sugar yield .
infected treatments e0 rhizomania e1 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The average decrease in sugar yield in infected treatments, for commercial resistant, tolerant, and susceptible cultivars was 25, 54, and 90%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1143 t0 “Sugar Beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 e1 “Results showed that rhizomania reduced the sugar yield by imposing a negative effect on root yield and sugar content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–986 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Infected susceptible sugar beet cultivars had a 90% average decrease in sugar yield .
infected treatments e0 rhizomania e1 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The average decrease in sugar yield in infected treatments, for commercial resistant, tolerant, and susceptible cultivars was 25, 54, and 90%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1143 t0 “Sugar Beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 e1 “Results showed that rhizomania reduced the sugar yield by imposing a negative effect on root yield and sugar content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–986 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Oryza sativa
Prunus persica
Solanum lycopersicum
Zea mays
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris