View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
low combined densities e0 do not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
insect visits were reduced by 50% e0 little decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing mottle disease severity was associated with moderate yield decrease .
disease severity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Increasing disease severity affect moderately plant yield decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1247 t0 “Black Pepper Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed competition can decrease alfalfa yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Weeds compete with alfalfa for water, nutrients, light, and space. This competition can decrease yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.
Goosegrass t1 weed Seed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 t1 “Goosegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation review summary measured Claim · model-written summary
Diseases may decrease marketable root yield .
yield of marketable roots e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease the yield of marketable roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–313 t0 “table beet ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 107–117 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Liaoyan 16 yield components did not decrease markedly under weedy rice interference.
yield components e0 no decrease markerly e0 Verbatim
e0 “However,the yield components of Liaoyan 16 was no decrease markerly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–698 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Mycotoxins of phytopathogenic fungi lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain.
yield and quality of grain e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Mycotoxins lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1220 Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The primary reason for the yield decrease was increased wheat infestation by pathogens.
pathogens e3 pathogen Verbatim
e3 “The primary reason for yield decrease in a given growing season was increased wheat infestation by pathogens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–706 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield reductions under quackgrass were mainly attributed to a decrease of spike density (author interpretation).
yield reductions e1 a decrease of spike density e1 Verbatim
e1 “These yield reductions were mainly attributed to a decrease of spike density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–733 e2 “and barley (Hordeum vulgare L. 'Cadette') ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–278 Other claims from this paper (7) Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust defoliation can decrease the next season’s fruit yield .
southern highbush blueberries e1 the next season’s fruit yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Severe leaf rust causes defoliation in the fall or early winter, which can decrease floral bud differentiation, photosynthesis, and the next season’s fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–312 e1 “southern highbush blueberries ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–66 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding within 30 days after planting should be practiced to minimize yield decrease in sesame.
within 30 days after planting e1 Verbatim
e0 “weed competition in sesame ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–86 e1 “once more hand weeding should be practiced within 30 days after planting to minimize yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1423 Other claims from this paper (15) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The study recommended continued work on the squash hybrid that achieved a yield decrease of only 14.6%.
hybrid that achieved a decrease of 14.6% e1 Verbatim
t0 “Watermelon mosaic virus Affecting Squash Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–92 e1 “the study recommended attention to the hybrid that achieved a decrease of 14.6% by continuing to work on it ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1729 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude an arsenical herbicide generally increases sicklepod control but may delay cotton maturity and decrease yield .
sicklepod e0 weed addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac e0 potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Where sicklepod is present, the addition of an arsenical herbicide to pyrithiobac will generally increase control but has the potential to delay maturity and decrease cotton yield equal to the arsenical herbicide applied alone. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1340 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
The model simulated lower cereal yield due to nitrogen competition.
competition for nitrogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in cereal yield due to competition for nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2413–2471 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A seedling infection index permitted estimates of subsequent yield decrease .
1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Symptoms of seedling infection incorporated into an index of infection permit estimates to be made o eventual decrease s in yield by applying the formula DY = 1.4 × (SH+LA+LL)+18. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–859 t0 “varieties of wheat, oats and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field testing found a significant decrease in bird numbers in targeted areas.
number of birds in the targeted areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “the result of the prototype field-testing showed a significant effect in decreasing the number of birds in the targeted areas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1407 e1 “Filipino rice farmers, resulting in losses in annual harvest yield . Farmers suffer the challenge of crop damage by birds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–165 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napust0
Helianthus annuus
Solanum tuberosum
Medicago sativa
Gossypium hirsutum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Triticum aestivum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Sesamum indicum
Avena sativa
Oryza sativa