View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing simazino rates tended to decrease wheat yield .
TreatmentIncreasing rates of simazino e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “it tended to decrease wheat yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–289 e1 “Increasing rates of simazino ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–208 t0 “Maize - Wheat Rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–47 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. campestris had a significant yield decrease .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–827 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organophosphate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentorganophosphate e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Carbamate treatments could decrease yield through toxicity when nematode populations were low.
Treatmentcarbamate nematicides e1 Qualifierthe toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “or in a yield decrease , because the toxicity of the materials was manifested when nematode populations were low. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–963 e1 “with organophosphate and carbamate nematicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–752 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Unprotected B. napus showed an apparent appreciable yield decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–785 t0 “RESPONSE OF FOUR BRASSICA SEED CROP SPECIES TO ATTACK BY THE CRUCIFER FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 e1 “Nevertheless the unprotected B. juncea treatment yield ed as much as the protected; B. napus , however, suffered an apparent appreciable decrease and B. campestris a significant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–827 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
EPTC and chloroamben caused the greatest yield decrease in 1973.
TreatmentEPTC at 3.4 kg/ha and chloroamben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid) at 3.4 kg/ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “EPTC at 3.4 kg/ha and chloroamben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid) at 3.4 kg/ha in 1973 caused the greatest root rot severity and greatest decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–453 t0 “Navy Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The other mixture component usually has lower yield than its monoculture.
Comparatortheir own monoculture e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants of the other component usually show a decrease , relative to their own monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–237 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying with 2,4-D for control of Rumex obtusifolius did not decrease grass yield .
Directiondid not decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “growth of Lolium perenne in the glasshouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 e2 “Spraying with 2,4‐D (0·84 kg acid equivalent/ha) for control of R. obtusifolius did not decrease grass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–640 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Initial populations of several named nematodes did not decrease cereal yield .
InteractorTylenchus Bastian e0 pest Outcomeyield of cereals e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 QualifierParatylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perry e0 Verbatim
e0 “initial populations of Tylenchus Bastian, Paratylenchus Micoletzky, Pratylenchus minyus Sher and Allen, P. crenatus Loof, P. penetrans Chitwood and Oteifa, Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus Golden and H. digonicus Perry did not decrease yield of cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–287 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no evidence that fungal diseases were involved in the herbage yield decrease at Rothamsted.
Outcomeno evidence that fungal diseases were involved e1 Verbatim
t0 “Grass Swards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 e1 “There was no evidence that fungal diseases were involved ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1182 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.